It seems as if your idea of heaven for 'Biblicist' is bossing around Presbyterians for all eternity. If I were a Presbyterian, if think I might prefer hell. here in Revelation the nations are saved.
Your wretched ecclesiology perverts the gospel of Jesus Christ and defends those who purposely and intentionally pervert the gospel of Jesus Christ.
Presbyterianism and all paedobaptists pervert the gospel of Christ by their mode and subject of baptism. The purpose of a symbol is to provide an explicit and exact VISIBLE FORM that conveys an intended truth. If one perverts the explicit and exact visible form they pervert the intended truth.
Charging me with breaking fellowship with the brethren over an external ordinance is as senseless as charging God with breaking fellowship with those he put to death in the Corinthian assembly for failing to discern the SYMBOLISM of the Lord's Supper as that was their very crime. And Paul rightly concluding what they were observing was not what they claimed (1 Cor. 11:20).
Charging me with dividing the brethren by refusing to recognize a COUNTERFEIT institution that calls itself the "church of Christ" is like charging the church at Thessalonica for excluding a "brother" for characteristic disobedience of Apostolic faith and order (that which is handed down to the churches by the apostles from Christ). And please don't give us that lame response that we are disfellowshipping any INDIVIDUAL brother by refusing to recognize their ordinances or their institution as New Testament as you cannot have "church" fellowship unless it is a "church" by NEW TESTAMENT DEFINITION not by Martin's definition or their definition.
Paedobaptism preaches "another gospel" by its perversion of both the mode and subject of baptism. And please don't respond with the garbage that all who preach another gospel must be lost as the churches of Galatia expose that false idea.
The very existence of a paedbaptist congregation as a professed church of Christ perverts the gospel of Jesus Christ by its very constitutency as it is PURPOSELY designed to include unregenerates as its primary membership thus reducing the metaphoric "body of Christ" to a body of unregnerates.
Moreover, you cannot find such a congregational body of unbaptized believers in scripture called a church by God's Word.
Moreover, you cannot find such a congregational body of comprised primarily by unregenerate infant membeship in scripture called a church by God's Word.
Moreover, both the precepts and examples in God's word forbid such a thing to be called "the church of Christ" or "the church of God" or a NT church.
Finally, true Christians found within the harlot (Rev. 18:4) are not found within either the metaphor of a "chaste virgin" (2 Cor. 11;2) now or in the metaphorical bride to come (Rev. 19:6-8) but will be found OUTSIDE the city upon the NEW earth is such great numbers they are called "NATIONS" of the "saved" as opposed to the fewer who comprise a "city" who in fact do rule over the nations just as a capital city now rules over a nation singular much less "nations" plural. The Christians that dwell outside on the New earth are vastly more in number ("nations") compared to those who will dwell inside the city. The idiotic interpretation you have presented that the "nations" and the "kings" are one in the same is easily debunked by the very language of the text as the text distinguishes between the two by calling some "kings" and others "nations" by the nations not bringing their own gloryin "into" the city but it being brought in by "their" kings. You must mishandle, pervert and spiritualize away the word of God when there is no contextual foundation for doing that.
BTW Jesus adopted this "bossing around" others in the world to come in the parable of the pounds (5 cities, 10 cities etc.). Jesus adopted this in the promise to the overcomers to "rule over the nations" in the age to come. What this consists of we don't exactly know, but we do know it is a form of rule over others in the new world.