https://nypost.com/2017/01/11/john-mccain-i-gave-russia-blackmail-dossier-on-trump-to-fbi/ John McCain is a Democrat in sheep's clothing......but we knew that all ready. This guy is lower than low old warmonger.
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
OK...So what did you expect him to do with it?https://nypost.com/2017/01/11/john-mccain-i-gave-russia-blackmail-dossier-on-trump-to-fbi/ John McCain is a Democrat in sheep's clothing......but we knew that all ready. This guy is lower than low old warmonger.
Hardly. He did what was entirely appropriate. If you have information that alleges that a major Washington figure is being compromised by the Russians, it is your patriotic duty to give it to an investigative agency for review.John McCain is a Democrat in sheep's clothing......but we knew that all ready. This guy is lower than low old warmonger.
.
If McCain had received information like this about Obama and turned it over to the FBI, would you be pitching a fit about his actions? I doubt it.
There's a context for this. If he will claim that he would be opposed to John McCain turning over this material if it referred to President Obama, then I will gladly and publicly apologize.Why do you doubt it. Quite the accusation and personal insult there. Did he insult you? For what is reason to you treat him with such hostility? Are you sure this is the behavior you want to engage in?
There's a context for this. If he will claim that he would be opposed to John McCain turning over this material if it referred to President Obama, then I will gladly and publicly apologize.
Let's see what he does.
Is it true? That's the real question.Its not necessary and it is childish.He can be opposed to this without having to bring up the other.
Is it true? That's the real question.
And why in the world would anyone be opposed to anyone reporting a matter of national security to an investigative agency for further analysis?
Loyal citizens do that very thing. Disloyal citizens worry about whether or not it helps their political agenda.
Then please broaden my mind as to why a loyal citizen should opposed to turning over information regarding a major threat to national security to the appropriate investigative agency.You are assuming some things about the poster of the op that you cannot substantiate. You also appear, at least, to have a very narrow and myopic view of the possibilities of being against this. I suggest you broaden your mind and ask for more clarification before trying to paint someone as you have
Stop right there.McCain has a long history of liberalism.
Irrelevant.He has been vehemently against Trump not just for moral or ethical reasons.
Irrelevant.He is a RINO at best.
The "No True Scotsman" fallacy. Even so, it is still irrelevant.Conservatives everywhere do not think much of him.
By turning it over to the FBI? McCain is not an investigator. Neither are you. Materials like that should go to the FBI. Any speculation about motivations are irrelevant.I like the poster of the op am suspicious that McCain only wanted to discredit Trump with info unsubstantiated and from a questionable source.
The "whole thing" has not been debunked.This whole thing has been debunked not only by the false details of the story but by James Clapper himself that called Trump and apologized.
That's a big IF.If McCain knew what he had was already in the hands of the FBI I doubt he would have messed with it.
I would be highly motivated to turn over information like that no matter if I agreed with the politician or not. It's called patriotism.Just because the FBI already had it doesn't remove the motivation from McCain. Sorry it doesn't work that way
You are lecturing me on civil discourse?Either way your accusations of the poster of the op do not promote civil discourse.
I am much more upse that some o fthe Media went an dran wild wth this, even though NO confimation of ay of the allenged facts!There's a context for this. If he will claim that he would be opposed to John McCain turning over this material if it referred to President Obama, then I will gladly and publicly apologize.
Let's see what he does.
In my opinion, BuzzFeed should not have released the memo. CNN did nothing inappropriate as far as I can tell. President-elect Trump actually confirmed everything that CNN reported.I am much more upse that some o fthe Media went an dran wild wth this, even though NO confimation of ay of the allenged facts!
I don't think he agreed that Russi has things to blackmail his with though!In my opinion, BuzzFeed should not have released the memo. CNN did nothing inappropriate as far as I can tell, President-elect Trump actually confirmed everything that CNN reported.
It is behavior like this from the establishment that won Trump the election in spite of his immoral lifestyle.
I am much more upse that some o fthe Media went an dran wild wth this, even though NO confimation of ay of the allenged facts!
Trust me, same Media would have buried anything like tis on Pres Obahma!
I don't understand what you are trying to communicate. Who is "he" and who is "his with"?I don't think he agreed that Russi has things to blackmail his with though!
Donald Trump did not agree with report saying Russia had stuff to blackmal him with, and Russia saidthat was bogus also!I don't understand what you are trying to communicate. Who is "he" and who is "his with"?