Featured Trump just got his first approval rating as president — and it's not good

“We know that other countries, in response to one mass shooting, have been able to craft laws that almost eliminate mass shootings — friends of ours, allies of ours — Great Britain, Australia, countries like ours,” Obama stated.

Great Britain and Australia, in their attempt to implement such gun laws, instituted mandatory gun confiscations, the Independant Journal reported.

Although it has been noted Australia’s was a “gun buyback program,” it was nonetheless mandatory, as were the confiscations in Britain.

 

Progressive liberals WILL eventually defeat the second amendment unless we are diligent in every generation!

"Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. We didn't pass it to our children in the bloodstream. It must be fought for, protected, and handed on for them to do the same." Ronald Reagan

Read more at: https://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/quotes/r/ronaldreag183965.html

HankD

 

Is gun control taking all of your guns?

 

I disagree because I don't consider regulation to be infringement.

 

How about when those "regulations" are being used as a tactic to "infringe" on those rights? Or do you deny that was the ongoing agenda and/or that it would have got a lot worse?

 

Yes!

HankD

 

I can't predict what would or would not have happened.

 

Stefan!

To tell me I can only have one size magazine for my defensive weapon is definitely an infringement (Not IMO, but what the constitution says implicitly as well as explicitly - No Infringements!).

HankD

 

I don't think it is.

 

You're entitled to your opinion on that matter. I disagree.

 

Yeah, OK.

HankD

 

I can...

You can call me psychic, but I don't think it takes much to put 2 and 2 together if one had listened to Hillary's sentiments and plans to know where it was heading despite her lies...

 

Banning gun ownership would be an example.

I don't support infringing either amendment. I just don't consider gun regulation to be infringement. Having the right to bear arms does not mean having the right to bear all kinds of arms or to have absolutely no restrictions in place. Most people would agree with that (such as not allowing private ownership of tactical nuclear weapons, to use an extreme example), but the question is just about the extent of the regulations.

 

That's a partly political and partly judicial question. Ultimately, the role will fall to the Supreme Court to interpret the law and the Constitution.