1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Featured God Does Not Will Any To Be Lost, Some Men Do!

Discussion in 'Calvinism & Arminianism Debate' started by AndyAnsell, May 5, 2017.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. TCassidy

    TCassidy Late-Administator Emeritus
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2005
    Messages:
    20,080
    Likes Received:
    3,491
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Me too. He was a committed CT man. :D

    Same concern. :D

    Georg, Germans spell things differently. Even their names. His Grammatik des Neutestamentlichen Sprachidioms was pretty good. But I think the title of Moulton's translation left something to be desired. I think it should have been "A Grammar of New Testament Idioms."

    Of course. But claiming victory by saying, "Well the Holy Spirit revealed this to me so that proves that I am right and you are wrong" is probably not a real good argument to make. It is too easy for your opponent to say, "Well the Holy Spirit revealed this to me so that proves that I am right and you are wrong!" So, in such discussions we are forced to rely on scholarship. :)

    Please. That is the 4th time you have implied that I am dishonest in my reasons for believing in Byzantine Priority. It has to stop. And it has to stop NOW!
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
  2. TCassidy

    TCassidy Late-Administator Emeritus
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2005
    Messages:
    20,080
    Likes Received:
    3,491
    Faith:
    Baptist
    You are making this personal. It is time to either dial it back a couple notches or take a break from the BB.

    Slandering your brothers and sisters in Christ is probably not the best way to gain credibility on this forum. :)
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
  3. McCree79

    McCree79 Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2015
    Messages:
    2,232
    Likes Received:
    305
    Faith:
    Baptist
    "Us", "you". Does it really matter? Peter wrote to the churches. "Us" and/or "you" would equal the church anyway. It is not like Peter issued a PSA to the pagans of Asia Minor.

    Sent from my SM-G935P using Tapatalk
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
    • Like Like x 1
  4. SovereignGrace

    SovereignGrace Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    May 31, 2015
    Messages:
    5,536
    Likes Received:
    1,026
    Faith:
    Baptist
    But repentance itself is a gift of God.

    God's wrath has been appeased for all who Christ died for. That is why they who die lost go to eternal torment. God's wrath has not been appeased towards them, as they have not had their sin debt paid by Christ.
     
  5. TCassidy

    TCassidy Late-Administator Emeritus
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2005
    Messages:
    20,080
    Likes Received:
    3,491
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Yes, but 2 Peter is part of what is called the "Catholic" or "General" Epistles. To the churches, certainly. All the churches, unlike Paul who named the churches he was writing to.

    But some will take that to mean Peter's intended readers went beyond the churches and were now addressing all of mankind. Peter makes it very clear his intended readers are "those who have obtained a like precious faith with us in the righteousness of our God and Savior, Jesus Christ."

    Hard to say, in context, that Peter is addressing the unconverted, but some, desperate to advance their flawed soteriological theories, will still insist on just that.
     
    • Winner Winner x 1
  6. SovereignGrace

    SovereignGrace Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    May 31, 2015
    Messages:
    5,536
    Likes Received:
    1,026
    Faith:
    Baptist
    We are not sour pusses, but tired of ppl trying to force the Christ to marry that which He did not die for, nor ever intended to marry. The church is His bride, and He died for His bride. This is per Ephesians 5:25.

    We are tired of ppl trying to make the Christ a goat herder when He is the Shepherd of His sheep, and not goats. But when we confront such erroneous doctrine, we're sourpusses? Hardly. Just tired of the error that gets pushed on here.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  7. SovereignGrace

    SovereignGrace Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    May 31, 2015
    Messages:
    5,536
    Likes Received:
    1,026
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Let me sum this post up in a more concise manner folks...

    [​IMG]
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Agree Agree x 1
  8. SovereignGrace

    SovereignGrace Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    May 31, 2015
    Messages:
    5,536
    Likes Received:
    1,026
    Faith:
    Baptist
    He isn't seeing his inconsistencies. He is saying God's wrath has been appeased. Great, then no one goes to hell. He then used John 3:36. So, which is it? God's wrath appeased or its not. God's wrath hovering over the disobedient does not mean His wrath has been appeased.

    Ah, but it has for those whom the Christ died for.

    Their exegesis and hermeneutics leave LOTS of holes in their theology and LOTS to be desired. :(
     
  9. Rippon

    Rippon Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2005
    Messages:
    19,715
    Likes Received:
    585
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Maurice Robinson, who you quote later in your post does not believe what "every textual critic on the face of the earth" believes. The majority of New Testament textual critics don't agree with your assertion either. Those that go with the Byzantine theory are in the minority.
     
  10. Rippon

    Rippon Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2005
    Messages:
    19,715
    Likes Received:
    585
    Faith:
    Baptist
    You are inconsistent. The CT based tranlations are notorious for their erroneous varients you say.
    The NKJV lists a fair number of variants and a number of translations list a number of them. Why not? Is that a
    notorious practice? No, it's the honest thing to do.

    How can the CT based translations be considered "notorious" on one hand yet 99.5% correct?

    You offer a new meaning for notorious.Anyone would want to be considered notorious if they are also considered to correct 99.5% of the time.
     
  11. TCassidy

    TCassidy Late-Administator Emeritus
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2005
    Messages:
    20,080
    Likes Received:
    3,491
    Faith:
    Baptist
    You seem to have missed the point. I said, "notorious for their . . . variants."

    Notorious = well known.

    I know very few people who are even moderately knowledgeable about bible texts, translations etc., who are unaware there are variants.
     
  12. TCassidy

    TCassidy Late-Administator Emeritus
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2005
    Messages:
    20,080
    Likes Received:
    3,491
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Once again you have failed to understand. Every text critic knows that number, being a factor in textual transmission, matters.

    Some place more emphasis on number than others but all consider number to be important. Including my friend, Dr. Robinson. But number is not the end all of manuscript evidence. It is one of the nine I listed.
     
  13. MennoSota

    MennoSota Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2017
    Messages:
    2,727
    Likes Received:
    443
    Faith:
    Non Baptist Christian
    Nothing in the verse says free will. For you to try extrapolate free will from this verse is for you to force your presupposition on the verse.
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
  14. AndyAnsell

    AndyAnsell Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2017
    Messages:
    83
    Likes Received:
    2
    Faith:
    Baptist
    It always is very personal. This is what I have seen first-hand from the Calvinists that I have known, to argue their point, even when they are clearly wrong. I see here that you cannot admit that the correct reading in 2 Peter 3:9 is "you", even though the greater majority of the textual evidence, of Greek manuscripts (older), Greek and English versions, do say that this is the original one. But, because this will indeed cause problems with your "theology", you will not accept it, and hang on to the CT as though it is so very right! These are facts, and in this debate it does get tough, and I have no intention of taking any break from BB.
     
  15. AndyAnsell

    AndyAnsell Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2017
    Messages:
    83
    Likes Received:
    2
    Faith:
    Baptist
    The EVIDENCE is stacked against you!
     
  16. AndyAnsell

    AndyAnsell Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2017
    Messages:
    83
    Likes Received:
    2
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Well said Rippon, I repeat again, that it is because of THEOLOGY and not what the text actually says, that people make their decisions on. They will look around for some support that agrees with them, and hang on to it for dear life. They will not accept that the MAJORITY of the textual evidence is clearly against them, because by doing so, their THEOLOGY is challenged!
     
  17. AndyAnsell

    AndyAnsell Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2017
    Messages:
    83
    Likes Received:
    2
    Faith:
    Baptist
    LOL!!! You guys talk about inconsistent? The EVIDENCE for 2 Peter 3.9, as YOU is in the GREATER versions of the Bible, which is deemed to be wrong because it would shoot holes in your THEOLOGY!
     
  18. AndyAnsell

    AndyAnsell Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2017
    Messages:
    83
    Likes Received:
    2
    Faith:
    Baptist
    It does matter, as one reading is correct and the other is not. For THEOLOGICAL purposes alone, the reading US is accepted by the few, as it helps their THEOLOGY, and will disregard what has the BEST evidence in textual studies, because if they did accept is, would challenge their THEOLOGY!
     
  19. AndyAnsell

    AndyAnsell Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2017
    Messages:
    83
    Likes Received:
    2
    Faith:
    Baptist
    "WE mus be honest". Unless you cannot understand the English language, WE includes ME!
     
  20. TCassidy

    TCassidy Late-Administator Emeritus
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2005
    Messages:
    20,080
    Likes Received:
    3,491
    Faith:
    Baptist
    And what evidence is that? So far I am the only one who has posted any evidence regarding the Greek manuscripts.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
Loading...