• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

God Does Not Will Any To Be Lost, Some Men Do!

Status
Not open for further replies.

TCassidy

Late-Administator Emeritus
Administrator
It is not the deciding factor.
I never said it was.

All things considered it is of modest import.
Some give it more weight than others but all consider it one of the indicators. Of the nine items I posted I would put it last.

I can try and find the quote by him in which he downplays the importance of the sheer number of manuscripts.
Why? We agree.
 

Yeshua1

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
ALL Calvinists who hold that Jesus only died for the "elect", and are therefore at odds with the plain teachings of the Holy Bible, which teaches a UNIVERSAL ATONEMENT (not salvation), are guilty of "willing that the non-elect perish". Whether this is liked or not, is not the issue, but the fact that this doctrine teaches something that actually challenges the Lord and His Word, by promoting something that is 100% against His Holy Word!
God is determining the destiny of the elect, its that predestination thing, but he is allowing the lost to "have their will be done"
 

Yeshua1

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
No, well-known for something bad.

You have not clarified anything.

You need to elaborate. You stated that the CT text forms are notorious for erroneous variants.


Trying to make sense of your sentence. In other words few people you know of have a modest amount of understanding about Bible texts and translations and they are aware of variants? Is that what you meant to say? If so, what's the point you are trying to make with that statement?

And coming back to your mysterious earlier statement. Shouldn't variants be mentioned or referenced in translations? You seem to inclined to believe that that is not proper or something.
We do not have a CT only or a Mt Only or a TR only greek text right? As we can accept and decide that one of them would be the closest and best of the originals, but none are the only text to be used?
 

AndyAnsell

Member
Site Supporter
Bible versions do not constitute manuscript evidence. You do know what a manuscript is, don't you?

Greek manuscript evidence for;

ἡμᾶς - codices, K, L, both of the 9th century. That's it! The number of secondary minuscule mss don't really matter much, as their parent could be from these two, which is no evidence in reality!

ὑμᾶς - Papyri Ms, P-72, 3rd century or earlier, codices, א, B, both 4th century, A, 5th cent. the principle minuscule mss, 33, 9th. Add to this the Old versions that were made from Greek manuscripts, the Old Latin, 2nd cent, Latin Vulgate 4th cent; Syriac-ph, 6th; Syriac-h, 7th; Coptic-sa, bo, from 3rd cent; Speculum, 4th cent.

You tell me now honestly, which evidence is the far stronger and older?
 
Last edited:

AndyAnsell

Member
Site Supporter
The scriptures though do teach the the Election of God is based solely upon His will in salvation and not those of lost sinners!

This does not deal with the FACT, that Peter is addressing the "mockers and scoffers" in chapter 3 of his Second Epistle, where he tells them, that "God is not willing that they perish". This needs to be responded to, and pages later no one Calvinist can refute what I have said!
 

AndyAnsell

Member
Site Supporter
.



I dont see theology or the variant making a difference here. Peter is speak to the beloved. Who is the beloved? Beloved is always used to refer to believers by Peter every time, even in 1 Peter So "you" or "us" is reffering to believers. This group Peter describes as,
" those who have obtained a faith of equal standing with ours by the righteousness of our God and Savior Jesus Christ". The variants makes no difference. Context controls the meaning .

Sent from my SM-G935P using Tapatalk

I suggest that you re-read this entire passage, and you will see, that Peter by using "YOU", in the text, is addressing those who are "mockers and scoffers", and told THEM that God does not will that they are lost!
 

AndyAnsell

Member
Site Supporter
God's not willing any should perish, yet billions will end up doing so.
God loves everyone w/o exception, but His wrath abides on the disobedient.
Man has a free will, yet its enslaved in sin.

Now, whose theology CONTRADICTS God's word?

As long as you Calvinists cannot accept the FACT, that there is FREE WILL which is a God-given gift to all mankind, which allows a sinner to either accept or reject the Gospel of Jesus Christ, you will never understand!
 

AndyAnsell

Member
Site Supporter
Brother Andy,

You keep saying man has a free will when Matthew 6:24, Romans 6:6 and Romans 6:16 easily refute it. Also, in John 8:36, Jesus said whoever the Son sets free is free indeed. This also includes their will. Jesus is the only One who can set ppl's will free.

NONE of these verses says anything about the WILL of man! Look at the words of Jesus to the unbelievers:

"But you do not have His word abiding in you, because whom He sent, Him you do not believe. You search the Scriptures, for in them you think you have eternal life; and these are they which testify of Me. But you are not willing to come to Me that you may have life." (John 5:38-40). NOTE, Jesus does NOT say, "you cannot will", but that "you do not will" of your own accord!
 

TCassidy

Late-Administator Emeritus
Administrator
ἡμᾶς - codices, K, L, both of the 9th century. That's it!
It is unfortunate, but I am not surprised you would falsify the manuscript evidence. :(

ἡμᾶς K L 049 104 330 451 629 2492 Byz (c300+ manuscripts) Lect (all of them) slav Ps-Oecumenius Theophylact ς ND Dio.
 

McCree79

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
I suggest that you re-read this entire passage, and you will see, that Peter by using "YOU", in the text, is addressing those who are "mockers and scoffers", and told THEM that God does not will that they are lost!
Wow.....no. It obvious from verse 8 that verse 9 is applied to the beloved. Theology is controlling your interpretation here.

Sent from my SM-G935P using Tapatalk
 

AndyAnsell

Member
Site Supporter
It is unfortunate, but I am not surprised you would falsify the manuscript evidence. :(

ἡμᾶς K L 049 104 330 451 629 2492 Byz (c300+ manuscripts) Lect (all of them) slav Ps-Oecumenius Theophylact ς ND Dio.

You say I accuse you of not being honest! You WRONGLY accuse me of giving false evidence! WHY don't you people READ before making silly statements? I said the evidence for "ἡμᾶς" is not stronger or older, and all the evidence that you have given amounts to nothing as what I have already shown for ὑμᾶς, is MUCH BETTER, but you cannot accept this, as your "theology" will be challenged in a way you cannot accept!
 

AndyAnsell

Member
Site Supporter
Wow.....no. It obvious from verse 8 that verse 9 is applied to the beloved. Theology is controlling your interpretation here.

Sent from my SM-G935P using Tapatalk

Ok, when you can understand what it says, come back... Why don't you read what I have said at the start of this thread, and then you may see better!
 

Van

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
The scriptures though do teach the the Election of God is based solely upon His will in salvation and not those of lost sinners!
I have supported that view, God alone chooses individuals for salvation through faith in the truth for about 5 years. But I am glad you now agree fully with scripture. That is progress!
 

Yeshua1

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
This does not deal with the FACT, that Peter is addressing the "mockers and scoffers" in chapter 3 of his Second Epistle, where he tells them, that "God is not willing that they perish". This needs to be responded to, and pages later no one Calvinist can refute what I have said!
God is not willing to have none whom will be saved to be lost, so that is why he is waiting now! The scoffers and mickers are as the false teachers...
 

Yeshua1

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
I have supported that view, God alone chooses individuals for salvation through faith in the truth for about 5 years. But I am glad you now agree fully with scripture. That is progress!
The saved were elected out before they even received jesus thru faith...
 

Van

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
2 Thessalonians 2:13 says the elect were chosen through faith in the truth. The Bible is not a smorgasbord where you pick and choose which verses to believe, it is all truth.
 

AndyAnsell

Member
Site Supporter
2 Thessalonians 2:13 says the elect were chosen through faith in the truth. The Bible is not a smorgasbord where you pick and choose which verses to believe, it is all truth.

This is another verse where the textual evidence is quite divided, and therefore cannot be used for doctrinal purposes. Instead of "ἀπ' ἀρχῆς", "from the beginning", there is another reading, "ἀπαρχὴν", "as first-fruit", as Paul does in Romans 16:5, for the "first converts" in Achaia. Both reading have about the same Greek manuscript and ancient version support.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top