I'm curious what your thoughts might be on this article, and the position laid out there in - namely, if you are not being accused of teaching antinomianism and licentiousness, you simply aren't preaching the same gospel that Paul preached....
Lloyd-Jones on The Gospel and the Charge of Antinomianism - Feeding on Christ
I ask because rarely have I heard a presentation of the gospel and come away thinking "wow, he's teaching that people can get saved and live however they want"
I have been accused of that by virtually every brand and stripe of Christian, however. And most unbelievers have misunderstood along those lines as well
Now, I'm not asking for someone to answer that charge.
I'm asking what are your thoughts on your presentation of the Gospel. Has it been your experience to be charged with antinomianism when you share Christ with people?
And what do you think of the idea that if you aren't charged with antinomianism, you aren't sharing the real gospel?
Lloyd-Jones on The Gospel and the Charge of Antinomianism - Feeding on Christ
I ask because rarely have I heard a presentation of the gospel and come away thinking "wow, he's teaching that people can get saved and live however they want"
I have been accused of that by virtually every brand and stripe of Christian, however. And most unbelievers have misunderstood along those lines as well
Now, I'm not asking for someone to answer that charge.
I'm asking what are your thoughts on your presentation of the Gospel. Has it been your experience to be charged with antinomianism when you share Christ with people?
And what do you think of the idea that if you aren't charged with antinomianism, you aren't sharing the real gospel?
