Was $15 million adequate to research such a massive attack on the USA? Especially when trillions are being wasted on endless wars resulting from acknowledged FALSE conclusions.
-
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
9/11 Revisited
- Thread starter asterisktom
- Start date
- Status
Was $15 million adequate to research such a massive attack on the USA? Especially when trillions are being wasted on endless wars resulting from acknowledged FALSE conclusions.
Someone not qualified to fly a little Cessna was able to do what the most experienced and skilled pilots have said is impossible?!
I don't think so.
Your faith in the incredible is foolhardy.
Don't be a hypocrite.
You have posted nonsense posts on this thread as well as on mine. Talk about off-topic --you specialize in that department.
"If you need to make it look as if buildings were destroyed by planes that struck them on high floors, you have to start the controlled demolition up there, instead of the bottom as you typically would. Since the detonators on cutter charges can be wireless and computer-controlled, there's no problem with doing this --you can create pretty much any scenario of destruction you want." p.42 of 9/11 :The Simple Facts by Arthur Naiman
Off topic.
Yeah, some relative somewhere is getting rich off of yall.
People who made truthful statements like that were immediately threatened to retract those statements to hide the truth. Some died by mysterious causes and some were murdered. That was done to maintain the government conspiracy theory.
Do you think someone could build a building today in Manhattan using 1929 building standards. Try selling a Model-T car.
Back to this topic. I have an overhead crane at my plant that was built in 1946. It is rated at 12.5 tons. It is built heavier than a modern 25 ton crane I also have. Many years ago, the inspection engineer said, "I bet this crane will pass a 30 ton load test." I said "whatever." I did not know he was going to do one. Later that day he said "that old crane passed the 30 ton load test with less flex than a modern 30 ton crane. He asked of I wanted him to do the paperwork to make it a 25 ton crane. I said "no, I have a 25 ton crane."
The really important point is finding not only thermite but thermate, which is a form of thermite laced with sulfur, underneath ground zero. This greatly increases the explosive power of the thermite. This explosive is what is used for controlled demolitions.
Last edited:
This demonstrates how superficial the investigation of 9/11 was compared to the witch hunt after the Clintons. New York residents voted for a thorough investigation but were refused by a federal judge.
So you're claiming that structural engineering hasn't progressed since 1929?
Ignoring what really happened at ground zero.
Truth is ON TOPIC.
I understand that there was an immediate assumption by the POTUS that bin Laden/al Qaeda were guilty of the attack. Therefore only a cursory inquiry was necessary & POTUS could get on with the objective of destroying Afghanistan & Iraq.
A proper adequately funded inquiry would have sought answers to the many questions raised in this thread - including:
why was the debris exported rather than retain for analysis?
why did ATC fail completely;
why did the security systems allow armed Arabs to fly?
etc
Some Islamic organisations may have expressed approval of the 9/11 attacks but this does not amount to an admission of responsibility - ISIS claim involvement in every terrorist attack, & who can refute the claim? It's no justification for destroying every country where ISIS operates.
Sez who? None of the people involved have said any such thing.
These are structural engineering professors and experts. Show me similar experts saying there was no molten steel underneath ground zero.
CIA Asset Susan Lindauer Whistleblower Jailed/Disappeared Via Patriot Act As Terrorist; Reveals Coverup Around 9/11, Iraq War, Etc.
US ATTORNEY GENERAL WANTED TO DETAIN SUSAN FOR TEN YEARS WITH NO HEARING, NO TRIAL, AND FORCIBLY DRUG HER INTO A CHEMICAL LOBOTOMY
She was held under indictment for five years. The people going after her wanted to forcibly drug her with 3 very powerful drugs to incapacitate her and make her unable to talk or think clearly enough to say anything to anyone.
A Green Road Journal: CIA Asset Susan Lindauer Whistleblower Jailed/Disappeared Via Patriot Act As Terrorist; Reveals Coverup Around 9/11, Iraq War, Etc.
The CIA tried to kill her but she finally was able to get released from prison where she was incarcerated because of her knowledge about 9/11 and the cause of the Iraq War.
US ATTORNEY GENERAL WANTED TO DETAIN SUSAN FOR TEN YEARS WITH NO HEARING, NO TRIAL, AND FORCIBLY DRUG HER INTO A CHEMICAL LOBOTOMY
She was held under indictment for five years. The people going after her wanted to forcibly drug her with 3 very powerful drugs to incapacitate her and make her unable to talk or think clearly enough to say anything to anyone.
A Green Road Journal: CIA Asset Susan Lindauer Whistleblower Jailed/Disappeared Via Patriot Act As Terrorist; Reveals Coverup Around 9/11, Iraq War, Etc.
The CIA tried to kill her but she finally was able to get released from prison where she was incarcerated because of her knowledge about 9/11 and the cause of the Iraq War.
- Status