• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Receiving a gift is not also part of the giving

Status
Not open for further replies.

Katarina Von Bora

Active Member
It is one thing to say salvation is completely of God and He does not need our help, which is true, and to say our faith that God credits of righteousness was supernaturally instilled before salvation (or after salvation if you agree with Agedman.)

1) We are saved through faith, thus our faith precedes our salvation, our faith provides access to the grace in which we stand, Romans 5:2.

2) Next we are chosen for salvation through faith (2 Thess. 2:13). So our election was conditional on the basis of faith in Christ.

3) Paul teaches (Romans 4:2-5) that salvation on the basis of faith is not a works based salvation.

Where does 'faith' come from?
 

agedman

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Reading through the last few pages of my posts, it occurs to me that at times my thoughts are working faster thN my one finger on the iPad.

I still have trouble with the iPad auto spelling and with the new scheme of the onscreen keyboard.

I trust that, if there is a post that doesn’t make sense or bring confusion when read, you will contact me so I can restate it more clearly.
 

Katarina Von Bora

Active Member
Agedman continues to post one falsehood after another, devoid of any on topic content. I said faith comes before salvation, which is to say salvation is through faith. No need to recant biblical truth. Agedman needs to recant his false theology.

Yes, you did say faith comes first. But you didn't say where faith comes from. It matters.
 

agedman

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
From where does faith come?

Romans 10:17 shares that faith comes by hearing.

Now it is self evident that not all who hear the gospel message receive or even comprehend that message.

The importance, however, is that there is a message.

It presupposes that the message has one who delivers that message in some form, be it written, verbal, or signed in some manor, the message is delivered.

Isaiah asks, "Who believed our report...?" If there had been no report there would be nothing in which to believe.

So two questions are asked.

First, is there faith in a report, message, without that report, message delivered?

The second is like the first, does faith then exist where there is no basis or necessary for faith?

To answer the questions one must come to terms that if nothing is available, there is no faith to extend.

However, "faith (is by, comes by, exists by, occurs by, materializes by) hearing, and hearing by the Word of God". Astute scholars know there is no Greek for what is translated "comes by" but is formed by the intent of the passage. It is not here time or space to argue how or why.

Therefore it is the message of the Scripture that is heard, the report (Isaiah 53) that is given.

It then follows that some believe and some do not.

That leads to the next question.

Who believes?

The answer is as Scriptures state, "He that has ears to hear."

The Romans 10 is establishing that no person is excusable when it comes to God manefesting Himself, be it Jew or Gentile.

The balance of Romans establishes that it is God that purposefully prevents hearing to some and opens stopped ears in others. It is in that light (the last chapter of Romans) that those with opened ears not only respond to the gospel, but conduct themselves in humility with the understanding God specifically allowed that one to be His for purpose and His glory.

No scripture passage establishes that Mark, Paul, Peter and John, ever wrote from the viewpoint that God was not directly involved not just at the moment of salvation but throughout his adopted child's whole pre life, life, and post life. The adopted child does not have ability to adopt the self, or even ask for the self in the matter of adoption.

Salvation was never a decision of human ability, nor offered to human kind with that understanding.

God is not reactive.

God is proactive in every child of His from before the conception, through the new birth, and prepares that dwelling in eternity specifically for that adopted child.

Therefore, he who hears is the one God has given the hearing ability. (Romans)

He who believes is the one whom God has given the ability. (John)

He who grows, matures to bear, is the one in whom God plants in the prepared soil. (Mark)

Isaiah rightly ask, "To whom is the arm of the Lord revealed?"

The answer can only be - to His own redeemed ones who He had given ears to hear.
 

FollowTheWay

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
I think a good example to examine is the story of the rich young ruler. He came to Jesus seeking eternal salvation. Jesus told him he must keep all the commandments to be saved. This wasn't a real option. Jesus knew this was impossible. When the young man lied and self-righteously replied that he had done this, Jesus got at the real heart of the matter. Yes, we are saved by grace through faith. I believe that the Holy Spirit directed the young man to seek out the only person who could offer salvation. Jesus looked at his heart and found that this man was controlled by his great wealth so He told him that he must sell all his goods and give them to the poor. The young man was unwilling to completely commit to Christ and went away.

This touches an aspect of salvation which has not been discussed here. Salvation is offered freely but it comes at a cost. Jesus said to Nicodemus, Ye must be born again. That is what He's saying here to the young man. I think the Holy Spirit had to reach out to the young man but he had to decide not only who could be his Savior but who must be the Master of his life. He accepted Jesus as his Savior but not as his Lord and was unregenerate.

Matthew 10:22
You will be hated by everyone on account of My name, but the one who perseveres to the end will be saved.

This requirement was in the SB Faith and Message of 1925 but was removed in the 1963 and 2000 updates. It was originally taken from the 1833 New Hampshire Confession.

11. Of the Perseverance of Saints
We believe that such only are real believers as endure unto the end John 8:31; 1 John 2:27-28; 3:9; 5:18; that their persevering attachment to Christ is the grand mark which distinguishes them from superficial professors 1 John 2:19; John 13:18; Matt. 13:20-21; John 6:66-69; Job 17:9; that a special Providence watches over their welfare Rom. 8:28; Matt. 6:30-33; Jer. 32:40; Psa. 121:3; 91:11-12; and they are kept by the power of God through faith unto salvation Phil. 1:6; 2:12-13; Jude 24-25; Heb. 1:14; 2 Kings 6:16; Heb. 13:5; 1 John 4:4.

In my view this was a critical step in the wrong direction by the SBC.
 

Revmitchell

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
[QUOTE="agedman, post: 2355519, member: 11131"

The balance of Romans establishes that it is God that purposefully prevents hearing to some and opens stopped ears in others. [/quote]

Romans does not establish that.

Salvation was never a decision of human ability, nor offered to human kind with that understanding.

God is not reactive.

Salvation is not but receiving it is. The reason for this is because God set it up that way. Not because man wanted it that way, not because man told God how to do it. Simply because God chose to offer salvation to His special created image bearer and then allow him to opportunity to receive it or reject it.

Therefore, he who hears is the one God has given the hearing ability. (Romans)

Everyone presented with the gospel hears the gospel and then is free to receive it or reject it.

He who believes is the one whom God has given the ability. (John)

Those who have the ability have been given the ability by having the gospel preached to them. Romans 1:16



Isaiah rightly ask, "To whom is the arm of the Lord revealed?"

The answer can only be - to His own redeemed ones who He had given ears to hear.

The answer is both to those who receive Him and those who do not. Romans 1:21
 

Revmitchell

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
The balance of Romans establishes that it is God that purposefully prevents hearing to some and opens stopped ears in others.

Romans does not establish that.



Salvation is not but receiving it is. The reason for this is because God set it up that way. Not because man wanted it that way, not because man told God how to do it. Simply because God chose to offer salvation to His special created image bearer and then allow him to opportunity to receive it or reject it.



Everyone presented with the gospel hears the gospel and then is free to receive it or reject it.



Those who have the ability have been given the ability by having the gospel preached to them. Romans 1:16





The answer is both to those who receive Him and those who do not. Romans 1:21[/QUOTE]
 

agedman

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Romans does not establish that.
]

How unfortunate that you make such a blanket statement without foundation.

Just because YOU state your opinion, does not make it factual.

PROVE by starting in Romans 10 and by Scripture show my post was in error.
 

Revmitchell

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
How unfortunate that you make such a blanket statement without foundation.

Just because YOU state your opinion, does not make it factual.

PROVE by starting in Romans 10 and by Scripture show my post was in error.

You are asking me to do what you yourself did not do. I responded to your post "in kind' meaning it was equal to the level of support your original post contained. Here it is:

"The balance of Romans establishes that it is God that purposefully prevents hearing to some and opens stopped ears in others."

All you did was state your opinion. I gave mine. You did not prove it by scripture nor did that statement make an attempt to use scripture to show my post or position was in error. Sorry for your hypocrisy. Further I would add you do not get to dictate from what portion of scripture I use to support my view. How arrogant.
 

agedman

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
You are asking me to do what you yourself did not do. I responded to your post "in kind' meaning it was equal to the level of support your original post contained. Here it is:

"The balance of Romans establishes that it is God that purposefully prevents hearing to some and opens stopped ears in others."

All you did was state your opinion. I gave mine. You did not prove it by scripture nor did that statement make an attempt to use scripture to show my post or position was in error. Sorry for your hypocrisy. Further I would add you do not get to dictate from what portion of scripture I use to support my view. How arrogant.
Your the one who stated, “Romans does not establish that,” so it is your responsibility to refute by showing Scripture proof from Romans 10 to the end of Romans.

I showed in broad outline that Romans did, now you are obliged, within the same parameters, to prove your statement of Romans not teaching what I set forth.

It is highly unlikely you will do so, but one could actually see just how established you can be with the Scriptures if you do so.
 

Revmitchell

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Your the one who stated, “Romans does not establish that,” so it is your responsibility to refute by showing Scripture proof from Romans 10 to the end of Romans.

No all you said and all I responded to was: "The balance of Romans establishes that it is God that purposefully prevents hearing to some and opens stopped ears in others." So no you did not show support for that statement.

[/QUOTE]
 

agedman

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
No all you said and all I responded to was: "The balance of Romans establishes that it is God that purposefully prevents hearing to some and opens stopped ears in others." So no you did not show support for that statement.

Then you failed again to read what I posted with comprehension, for I didn’t have to report on every verse of the last of Romans but merely give a summery.

You disagree, so prove it by Scriptures.

Take the two paragraphs of the post beginning with “the balance....” and prove that Romans does not show what is posted.

I did that with Van’s quote.

Are you as skilled?
 

agedman

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
I did not quote an paragraphs. So no
Truly sad that you seem to have no desire to really share the Scriptures to prove your thinking.

Evidence seems to be that you are content making attempts of unfounded discredit with no proof.

There is a word for that personality type.
 

Revmitchell

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Truly sad that you seem to have no desire to really share the Scriptures to prove your thinking.

Evidence seems to be that you are content making attempts of unfounded discredit with no proof.

There is a word for that personality type.

when you do I will.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top