1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Atonement sparks discussion at NOBTS forum

Discussion in 'Baptist Theology & Bible Study' started by Revmitchell, Nov 21, 2017.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Martin Marprelate

    Martin Marprelate Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2010
    Messages:
    8,909
    Likes Received:
    2,128
    Faith:
    Baptist
    It is beyond time that you stopped repeating this utter falsehood.
    I spent a huge amount of time giving the Scriptural evidence for Penal Substitution and you never engaged with any of it.
    Do you want me to copy and paste the thing again?
     
  2. HankD

    HankD Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    May 14, 2001
    Messages:
    26,977
    Likes Received:
    2,537
    Faith:
    Baptist
    We sometimes get in trouble using human reasoning and logic and then try to put God into a mold of our own making, trying to make sense of His doings.

    "If God has done X then He must do Y".
    "If God hasn't done A He cannot do B".

    And several other permutations of which I am guilty.

    Ecclesiastes 3:11 He has made everything beautiful in its time. Also He has put eternity in their hearts, except that no one can find out the work that God does from beginning to end.

    Ecclesiastes 8:17 then I saw all the work of God, that a man cannot find out the work that is done under the sun. For though a man labors to discover it, yet he will not find it; moreover, though a wise man attempts to know it, he will not be able to find it.

    I believe this is still true even today with the indwelling Holy Spirit to help us - though a wise man think to know it, yet shall he not be able to find it.

    HankD
     
    #182 HankD, Nov 25, 2017
    Last edited: Nov 25, 2017
    • Like Like x 1
  3. Martin Marprelate

    Martin Marprelate Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2010
    Messages:
    8,909
    Likes Received:
    2,128
    Faith:
    Baptist
    God was bound to uphold His own righteousness. '....By no means clearing the guilty' (Exodus 34:7). 'He who justifies the wicked, and he who condemns the just, both of them alike are an abomination to the LORD' (Proverbs 17:15). 'That He might be just and the justifier of the one who believes in Jesus' (Romans 3:26). God must punish the wicked, and so Christ was made sin (2 Corinthians 5:21)-- that is, He had all our sins laid upon Him (Isaiah 53:6) and He bore the punishment for them (Isaiah 53:5, 10; 1 Peter 2:24).

    I am sick to death of hearing about Calvin-- and Justin Martyr come to that. These are just a few of the texts that I have quoted time and time again, and I expect you to deal with each one individually if you want to establish your case and stop stonewalling by making blanket denials without a single text of Scripture.
     
  4. JonC

    JonC Moderator
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2001
    Messages:
    35,198
    Likes Received:
    3,791
    Faith:
    Baptist
    You never gave its basis. I understand how PSA interprets the passages you gave but you have not proved the reason it's context should be adopted.

    And to be honest I knew you couldn't. That is why the PSA is one among other theories. I was just hoping you would realize this by now.
     
  5. JonC

    JonC Moderator
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2001
    Messages:
    35,198
    Likes Received:
    3,791
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Same text tells us God will not convict the righteous. Are you implying God is unrighteous?
     
  6. JonC

    JonC Moderator
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2001
    Messages:
    35,198
    Likes Received:
    3,791
    Faith:
    Baptist
    We have to be careful not to confuse our understanding with Scripture itself. Thus far PSA has been argued as if it is Scripture rather than one of several theories of atonement. We all believe we are correct, otherwise we would change our view (which I did long ago). But we also need to be able to discern why we believe what we believe. We need to understand, as best we can, where Scripture ends and theory begins.

    The fact, as unpleasant as some may find it, is each theory makes assumptions. For PSA it is a contextual framework through which Christ's work is viewed. God does not, I believe, give special revelation beyond what is revealed in Scripture. We can be wrong in our assumptions, yet agree in other areas. I have learned from the works of Calvin, Lewis, Luther and Wesley. None of them looked at the Atonement the same way. But first one has to be willing not to lean on his understanding.
     
  7. HankD

    HankD Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    May 14, 2001
    Messages:
    26,977
    Likes Received:
    2,537
    Faith:
    Baptist
    So true!

    HankD
     
  8. agedman

    agedman Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2011
    Messages:
    11,023
    Likes Received:
    1,108
    Faith:
    Baptist
    You must think God had a limited supply that was efficient for only a very few, and miserly doled out to only the elect.

    Did Not Christ shed His blood for sinners, for the the ungodly?

    Not a single place does Scripture state the blood was ONLY for the elect.

    Yet it does state just the opposite.

    Do you consult Scriptures?

    The Scriptures do not support atonement limited by blood.

    The limit established by God is belief. That in which God has total authority to endow to whom He purposes to salvation

    Prove me wrong by Scripture.

    Or, do you merely desire to denigrate by inappropriate label that has no true application hoping that such might weaken the statement of Scriptures?
     
  9. thatbrian

    thatbrian Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2008
    Messages:
    2,686
    Likes Received:
    389
    Faith:
    Baptist
    The supply was actually limited. Christ was human; therefore He had about 1.5 gallons of blood, but the supply is not the point.

    Christ did not come to save all men. That is clear; therefore, His blood did not cover (atone for) the sin of every person. If it had there would be no condemnation for any. If we say that Christ died for a man, we understand that man is saved from condemnation.

    Not all men are saved; therefore, Christ did not die for all men. That's simple. The truth often is. Religion often complicates things.
     
    • Winner Winner x 1
  10. agedman

    agedman Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2011
    Messages:
    11,023
    Likes Received:
    1,108
    Faith:
    Baptist
    You have formed nothing but human desire for retribution and retaliation by a man centered THEORY which is not foundational to Scripture.

    Such a claim that I am forming heretical view is not tolerable.

    Prove by any verse, a passage, a book, the whole course of Scripture, the validity of your theory, or recant and embrace the truth.
     
  11. JonC

    JonC Moderator
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2001
    Messages:
    35,198
    Likes Received:
    3,791
    Faith:
    Baptist
    False logic
     
  12. agedman

    agedman Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2011
    Messages:
    11,023
    Likes Received:
    1,108
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Ok, professor.

    However, it is my view that the efficiency and sufficiency thinking is not completely sustainable by Scripture, and can be considered as a way to try to bridge between the unscriptural view of reformed limited atonement and the Scriptural view that the blood was shed for all sin, of all people of all time.
     
  13. thatbrian

    thatbrian Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2008
    Messages:
    2,686
    Likes Received:
    389
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Romans 6:23 - For the wages of sin [is] death; but the gift of God [is] eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord.

    Psalms 145:20 - The LORD preserveth all them that love him: but all the wicked will he destroy.

    Matthew 25:46 - And these shall go away into everlasting punishment: but the righteous into life eternal.

    Ezekiel 18:20 - The soul that sinneth, it shall die. The son shall not bear the iniquity of the father, neither shall the father bear the iniquity of the son: the righteousness of the righteous shall be upon him, and the wickedness of the wicked shall be upon him.

    Galatians 6:7 - Be not deceived; God is not mocked: for whatsoever a man soweth, that shall he also reap.

    James 1:15 - Then when lust hath conceived, it bringeth forth sin: and sin, when it is finished, bringeth forth death.

    Romans 5:12 - Wherefore, as by one man sin entered into the world, and death by sin; and so death passed upon all men, for that all have sinned:

    Ezekiel 18:4 - Behold, all souls are mine; as the soul of the father, so also the soul of the son is mine: the soul that sinneth, it shall die.

    2 Corinthians 5:10 - For we must all appear before the judgment seat of Christ; that every one may receive the things [done] in [his] body, according to that he hath done, whether [it be] good or bad.

    Acts 3:19 - Repent ye therefore, and be converted, that your sins may be blotted out, when the times of refreshing shall come from the presence of the Lord;

    1 John 3:4 - Whosoever committeth sin transgresseth also the law: for sin is the transgression of the law.

    Romans 2:6-10 - Who will render to every man according to his deeds: (Read More...)

    2 Corinthians 5:21 - For he hath made him [to be] sin for us, who knew no sin; that we might be made the righteousness of God in him.


    Read what I said again. I criticized the method of picking verses, rather than forming thoughts based on a broad reading of holy scripture.
     
  14. thatbrian

    thatbrian Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2008
    Messages:
    2,686
    Likes Received:
    389
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Helpful comment.
     
  15. JonC

    JonC Moderator
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2001
    Messages:
    35,198
    Likes Received:
    3,791
    Faith:
    Baptist
    You are welcome. Sometimes we just need it pointed out. (Your "if-then" statement is false logic).
     
  16. agedman

    agedman Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2011
    Messages:
    11,023
    Likes Received:
    1,108
    Faith:
    Baptist
    You are placing salvation as limited to blood.

    That is not the Scripture teaching.

    You are also attempting to limit the death to be for a few, again not supported by Scripture.

    “Christ came to seek and to save the lost.. “ are there any ever that were righteous on their own and not lost?

    Your statements do not have the support of Scripture.
     
  17. agedman

    agedman Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2011
    Messages:
    11,023
    Likes Received:
    1,108
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Yet that is exactly 2hatbyou attempted very poorly to present in this post.

    The “broad reading of Holy Scripture” does not support limiting the blood to the few.
     
  18. thatbrian

    thatbrian Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2008
    Messages:
    2,686
    Likes Received:
    389
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Actually, God made the rules regarding this subject.

    Indeed, under the law almost everything is purified with blood, and without the shedding of blood there is no forgiveness of sins. (Hebrews 9:22 ESV)
     
  19. Squire Robertsson

    Squire Robertsson Administrator
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2000
    Messages:
    15,371
    Likes Received:
    2,405
    Faith:
    Baptist
    This thread is closed.
     
    • Like Like x 1
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
Loading...