Why Trump shoud be Impeached

[Revmitchell]

Read my statement. "He should be impeached because he colluded with Russia to change the result of our presidential election. He then has acted to cover-up that crime." The rest is my view of how terrible a President he's been.

No the dems did that.

 

[Reynolds]

Read my statement. "He should be impeached because he colluded with Russia to change the result of our presidential election. He then has acted to cover-up that crime." The rest is my view of how terrible a President he's been.

There is still no credible evidence of Trump and Russian collusion. Rules of evidence might interest you. At this moment on time, there is more evidence of John McCain colluding with Russia than anyone else.

 

[ChrisTheSaved]

Read my statement. "He should be impeached because he colluded with Russia to change the result of our presidential election. He then has acted to cover-up that crime." The rest is my view of how terrible a President he's been.

Say that's true (its not) how did the change the result of the election?

 

[FollowTheWay]

There is still no credible evidence of Trump and Russian collusion. Rules of evidence might interest you. At this moment on time, there is more evidence of John McCain colluding with Russia than anyone else.

Proof?

 

[FollowTheWay]

Say that's true (its not) how did the change the result of the election?

You'll find out when the investigation is completed.

 

[Squire Robertsson]

Until then, let's not talk about facts not in evidence.

You'll find out when the investigation is completed.

 

[FollowTheWay]

Until then, let's not talk about facts not in evidence.

The reality is we have a president who is being investigated by a special counsel for consorting with a foreign enemy to change the result of our election and then trying to do a cover-up. That is a fact.

 

[Earth Wind and Fire]

There is still no credible evidence of Trump and Russian collusion. Rules of evidence might interest you. At this moment on time, there is more evidence of John McCain colluding with Russia than anyone else.

Not yet anyway

 

[just-want-peace]

Seems a bit ridiculous to start an investigation before there’s substantial evidence of a crime that needs investigating. Seems a bit absurd (except in liberalise) to start investigating a crime that has yet to be committed.
But then after 8 years of faux utopia, nothing should be surprising; maybe something you did not know, but not surprising!!

 

[Yeshua1]

Read my statement. "He should be impeached because he colluded with Russia to change the result of our presidential election. He then has acted to cover-up that crime." The rest is my view of how terrible a President he's been.

NO evidence to support anything that you have been claiming....

 

[Yeshua1]

Sir, she is the smartest woman in the world.

Just among Democratic women!

 

[Reynolds]

Proof?

You, the one advocating impeachment, has the burden of proof.

 

[Reynolds]

Not yet anyway

And until there is, why is the leftyacking about it?

 

[ChrisTheSaved]

Not yet anyway

So if this turns out to all be a scam and the democrats are pulling the wool are you going to shun them? Or are you going to keep the ruse up?

 

[FollowTheWay]

You, the one advocating impeachment, has the burden of proof.

No. The investigating commission will provide the proof. But you're blind if you don't see some potential for prosecution.

 

[Reynolds]

No. The investigating commission will provide the proof. But you're blind if you don't see some potential for prosecution.

Why did you tell me to provide proof? Do I see potential? Sure, but very low probability. Why? 1. I don't think he broke the law. 2. If he did, Jay Sekulow will outmaneuver any of the incompetents investigating it.

 

[Earth Wind and Fire]

And until there is, why is the leftyacking about it?

I dun know nor care

 

[Earth Wind and Fire]

Why did you tell me to provide proof? Do I see potential? Sure, but very low probability. Why? 1. I don't think he broke the law. 2. If he did, Jay Sekulow will outmaneuver any of the incompetents investigating it.

can ahhhh Stormy, Haaaa Haaaa Haaaaa!

T minus 5 & counting. This guys entertainment value is incredible.

 

[FollowTheWay]

Why did you tell me to provide proof? Do I see potential? Sure, but very low probability. Why? 1. I don't think he broke the law. 2. If he did, Jay Sekulow will outmaneuver any of the incompetents investigating it.

Fine. Let's just let the investigation determine the answer. OK?

 

[InTheLight]

Fine. Let's just let the investigation determine the answer. OK?

How long should it continue? Two years? Three? Can we put a deadline on the investigation?

Sent from my Pixel 2 XL