Featured Non-Calvinist Theologians (resurrected thread)

Enns claims to be a Calvinist but he is also a theological Progressive. He purports the Genesis myth theory.

 

He holds the same viewpoint as CS lewis did then?

 

Depends on who you ask lol

 

Norman Geisler holds to a more balanced view.
Dr. Grant C. Richison (http://versebyversecommentary.com/) is another one.

 

Non-traditional would be putting it mildly. Research the Genesis myth controversy and you will know why I am not an Enns fan.

 

One big difference between the two is that Lewis never passed himself off as a theologian proper.

 

You are mistaken. He was indeed an ardent Calvinist. Whitefield, William Jay and Spurgeon all regarded his commentary very highly as a fellow Calvinist.

Look at his treatment of John 10:26 and Isaiah 53 for starters.

 

Rippon, Matthew Henry's view has been documented in recent scholarship:

The Extent of the Atonement (Broadman & Holman, 2016)

The Gospel According to Matthew Henry, Matthew Henry Conference (2014)

 

I'm afraid I'm not impressed with either of those sources. The first link seems to think that anyone who is not John Gill must believe in General Redemption.
The second is by Alan Clifford who is an Amyraldian and slightly nutty. He spends his time trying to prove that he is orthodox and that everyone in the world agrees with him. They don't.

Henry was a Calvinist.

 

A list of non-Cals does not demonstrate they were any less shoddy in their study than a list of Cals.
How many of the non-Cal names taught Christ died for all mankind, those to be saved and those never to be saved?
Ditto for the other four points of the TULIP.
Then we might have a thread for edification.

 

What sources?

Without a doubt.

 

Post #23.

 

Non-Calvinist Theologians (resurrected thread)

I am confused (which does not take much).

 

Oops! Sorry! Post #33 by Jerome. He gave two links.