There has been much conversation on the BB about how people who do not hold to Penal Substitution Theory can still view Christ’s death as necessary.
The question is wrong. It is foolish to believe that of all Christians who have lived only a minority who hold to Penal Substitution Theory view the Cross as a necessity insofar as the redemption of mankind.
A better question is - How is it that Christ’s death is “for our sins”?
Some view the Cross as representing the payment for a debt owed to God because of Adam’s transgression.
Others believe the Cross represents a blood sacrifice to appease the wrath of God and satisfy a “sin debt”.
Others view Christ’s death as the destruction of sin and death by healing the corruption of sin.
Some view Christ’s death as a necessary component of becoming man (as a necessary aspect of the Incarnation).
Some view Christ’s death as being necessary at the hands of men through the will of God (embodying the principalities of sin and evil) rather than at the hand of the Father and the Resurrection as indicative of victory.
Of course there are views in between and further out. These are just examples.
All of them require the Cross. But each views how Christ’s death was for our sins differently.
The question is wrong. It is foolish to believe that of all Christians who have lived only a minority who hold to Penal Substitution Theory view the Cross as a necessity insofar as the redemption of mankind.
A better question is - How is it that Christ’s death is “for our sins”?
Some view the Cross as representing the payment for a debt owed to God because of Adam’s transgression.
Others believe the Cross represents a blood sacrifice to appease the wrath of God and satisfy a “sin debt”.
Others view Christ’s death as the destruction of sin and death by healing the corruption of sin.
Some view Christ’s death as a necessary component of becoming man (as a necessary aspect of the Incarnation).
Some view Christ’s death as being necessary at the hands of men through the will of God (embodying the principalities of sin and evil) rather than at the hand of the Father and the Resurrection as indicative of victory.
Of course there are views in between and further out. These are just examples.
All of them require the Cross. But each views how Christ’s death was for our sins differently.