• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Satan as a "type of Christ"

Status
Not open for further replies.

JonC

Moderator
Moderator
Defined by what, similarities? NO. Defined by dissimilarities.
I disagree that the type is defined by dissimilarities (I'm actually not even sure that makes sense). It's like saying we are the same type because we are different.
 

JonC

Moderator
Moderator
It makes as much sense as "But not as the trespass, so also is the free gift."
I am not following you (sorry).

Romans 5:15
But not as the offence, so also is the free gift.

It means the free gift is not like the offense.

Are you suggesting "the offense" here is a type of "the free gift"?
 

kyredneck

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
I am not following you (sorry).

Maybe this will help. You don't understand it when I say that Adam as a FIGURE of Christ is defined by dissimilarities to Christ. I've highlighted SEVEN dissimilarities, from scripture, in my first post. Seven dissimilarities.

Now, from scripture, list the similarities that define Adam as a type of Christ. FYI, before you give your list, first Adam and last Adam are dissimilarities (which brings the count to EIGHT dissimilarities).

List all the similarities.
 
Last edited:

JonC

Moderator
Moderator
Maybe this will help. You don't understand it when I say that Adam as a FIGURE of Christ is defined by dissimilarities to Christ. I've highlighted SEVEN dissimilarities, from scripture, in my first post. Seven dissimilarities.

Now, from scripture, list the similarities that define Adam as a type of Christ. FYI, before you give your list, first Adam and last Adam are dissimilarities (which brings the count to EIGHT dissimilarities).

List all the similarities.
I understand how the types are different. I do not understand how you can believe what makes them "types" are in their differences.

Do to say Satan is a type of Christ is to say they are of the same kind with Satan pointing to Christ (even if through contrast).

My objection is saying Satan is a type of Christ. I believe it is wrong.
 

kyredneck

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
I understand how the types are different. I do not understand how you can believe what makes them "types" are in their differences.

Because scripture is defining by differences in Ro 5.

Do to say Satan is a type of Christ is to say they are of the same kind with Satan pointing to Christ (even if through contrast).

My objection is saying Satan is a type of Christ. I believe it is wrong.

I think it's wrong too. In my first post I stated there's no pointer in scripture that would lead to it.
 

agedman

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
I can well understand how one's traditions might prevent one from accepting this remarkable typology, but facts are facts. What was nailed to the pole and hoisted up in place was not a lamb, as one might expect, but a fiery serpent. Where have we seen a fiery serpent before? In Revelation 13. It's there. Everyone who looked at the serpent was healed from the penalty for their rebellion against God (Numbers 21:9). How can looking at a representation of Satan heal people in that way? But the Lord Jesus says, "And this is the will of Him who sent Me that everyone who sees the Son and believes in Him may have everlasting life" (John 6:40; c.f. also Isaiah 45:22).

It is a cardinal point about types that they cannot be pressed too far. If we say that Isaac or Joseph or David is a type of Christ, we do not mean that these people correspond exactly with our Lord in every way. Of course they don't. But we are able to see in the lives of these people a clear resemblance in certain respects to the Lord Jesus that is invaluable in preaching from the O.T.

So I would just encourage people to lay aside their traditions and preconceptions and look at the Scriptures to see that the brazen serpent is a representation of Satan and a clear type of Christ made sin for us that we might become the righteousness of God in Him.
Martin,

You are correct that a lamb was not lifted up, but you are not correct in assuming it was the type of Satan, but the authority stripped from Satan.

The typology is the accomplished work of the crucifixion, it was not that of a sin offering but that of life and healing aspects.

The folks looking upon the wilderness serpent of the wilderness served as a typology to the nullification of the power of Satan over death and the grave.

8And the LORD said to Moses, “Make a fiery serpent and set it on a pole, and everyone who is bitten, when he sees it, shall live.9So Moses made a bronze serpent and set it on a pole. And if a serpent bit anyone, he would look at the bronze serpent and live.

Therefore, the your thinking is correct in that the wilderness brazen serpent was not a sin offering, but mistaken in thinking it was not a typology of the Christ.
 

JonC

Moderator
Moderator
Because scripture is defining by differences in Ro 5.



I think it's wrong too. In my first post I stated there's no pointer in scripture that would lead to it.
I agree the point between Adam and Christ (in that passage) is their differences.

I am sorry - I misunderstood ypu to be saying you also believed Satan was a type of Christ. I find that idea more objectionable than many that I would disagree with on the BB so I can't apologize enough for my error.
 

kyredneck

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
I agree the point between Adam and Christ (in that passage) is their differences.

I am sorry - I misunderstood ypu to be saying you also believed Satan was a type of Christ. I find that idea more objectionable than many that I would disagree with on the BB so I can't apologize enough for my error.

No big deal. I guess I wasn't clear. I meant that if someone wanted to Satan could be presented as a type through contrast as Adam is, but there's nothing in scripture that even suggests such a thing.
 

kyredneck

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
In the thread Christ made Sin? @Martin Marprelate (with the approval of @percho and winning approval of @SovereignGrace ) compared Christ as being lifted up to Satan in Revelation 12:3 and suggested that Scripture presenting Satan as "a type of Christ" is proof that Christ was literally made sin.

That's assinine. It shows desperation on their part to force their dogma. Christ is none other than the Man Child in Rev 12.

[add]

...and I should've noted this in my first post. It's just that the Adam narrative is fresh on my mind because of recent topics.
 
Last edited:

Martin Marprelate

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
My view is that Satan is not "a type of Christ".
I think that if you are going to suggest that you are quoting me by using inverted commas, you should at least quote me accurately. What I said was:
the brazen serpent is a representation of Satan and a clear type of Christ made sin for us that we might become the righteousness of God in Him.
The brazen serpent is a type of Christ made sin for us.
 

Martin Marprelate

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Martin,

You are correct that a lamb was not lifted up, but you are not correct in assuming it was the type of Satan, but the authority stripped from Satan.
You are correct insofar as Christ on the cross strips the power from Satan
The typology is the accomplished work of the crucifixion, it was not that of a sin offering but that of life and healing aspects.
All mankind in a sense have been bitten by the serpent, since we are all lost in sin and dying as result of Satan's activity. It is when we see Christ with the eye of faith, suffering, bleeding, dying on the cross that we are healed (Isaiah 53:5; John 6:40).
The folks looking upon the wilderness serpent of the wilderness served as a typology to the nullification of the power of Satan over death and the grave.

8And the LORD said to Moses, “Make a fiery serpent and set it on a pole, and everyone who is bitten, when he sees it, shall live.9So Moses made a bronze serpent and set it on a pole. And if a serpent bit anyone, he would look at the bronze serpent and live.

Therefore, the your thinking is correct in that the wilderness brazen serpent was not a sin offering, but mistaken in thinking it was not a typology of the Christ.
It is quite clearly a type of Christ made sin for us. He counteracts and destroys the activity of Satan (1 John 3:8; c.f. Luke 10:18-19) by becoming sin for us that we may become the righteousness of God in Him..
 

JonC

Moderator
Moderator
I think that if you are going to suggest that you are quoting me by using inverted commas, you should at least quote me accurately. What I said was:

The brazen serpent is a type of Christ made sin for us.
I was using them to set off the phrase "a type of Christ" (another use of the punctuation). The Baptist Board is equipped with a quote feature. That is what I use to quote members comments.
 

kyredneck

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
All mankind in a sense have been bitten by the serpent

In the type, not all had the need to look upon the brazen serpent.

14 And as Moses lifted up the serpent in the wilderness, even so must the Son of man be lifted up;
15 that whosoever believeth may in him have eternal life. Jn 3

8 And Jehovah said unto Moses, Make thee a fiery serpent, and set it upon a standard: and it shall come to pass, that every one that is bitten, when he seeth it, shall live. Nu 21

Note that the brazen serpent was lifted up for those that were bitten. Those NOT bitten had no need to go to the brazen serpent.

.........They that are whole have no need of a physician, but they that are sick: I came not to call the righteous, but sinners. Mk 2:17

6 Blessed are they that hunger and thirst after righteousness: for they shall be filled. Mt 5

It is the Spirit working within His children that causes them to feel their need for the Savior.
 
Last edited:

kyredneck

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Note the distinction between the two types:

14 And as Moses lifted up the serpent in the wilderness, even so must the Son of man be lifted up; Jn 3

14 Nevertheless death reigned from Adam until Moses, even over them that had not sinned after the likeness of Adam`s transgression, who is a figure of him that was to come.
15 But not as the trespass, so also is the free gift. For if by the trespass of the one the many died, much more did the grace of God, and the gift by the grace of the one man, Jesus Christ, abound unto the many.
16 And not as through one that sinned, so is the gift: for the judgment came of one unto condemnation, but the free gift came of many trespasses unto justification. Ro 5
 

The Biblicist

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
On another thread a member came to a rather interesting conclusion, one that I personally had not considered previously. It is a conclusion that I believe can be rather quickly dismissed, but since a couple of members agreed with the posting I thought it worth exploring a little.

In the thread Christ made Sin? @Martin Marprelate (with the approval of @percho and winning approval of @SovereignGrace ) compared Christ as being lifted up to Satan in Revelation 12:3 and suggested that Scripture presenting Satan as "a type of Christ" is proof that Christ was literally made sin.Let's consider: How does Scripture present Satan?

He is the father of lies (John 8:44).

He is the thief that comes only to steal and kill and destroy; contrasted with Christ who came that men may have life and have it in abundance (John 10:10).

He is the enemy of mankind (1 Peter 5:8).

He is the author of the “powers of this dark world” and the “spiritual forces of evil in the heavenly realms” (Ephesians 6:11).

He is the accuser of men (Job 1:6-12).

He is the tormentor of men (2 Corinthians 12:1-10).

He is opposed to the Church (Revelation 2:8-10).

There are, of course, at least two sides of the argument: Those who affirm Satan as a type of Christ (at least @Martin Marprelate , @percho , and @SovereignGrace ) and those who reject the idea as unbiblical.

What is interesting is how Satan is viewed as well. When we look at Scripture Satan is not viewed as "God's accuser" but as the "accuser of man". So is Satan God's adversary or the adversary of man?

How one answers that question is important. I do not believe that God has legitimate adversary because no one can actually strive against God except as God has permitted. So I view Satan as the adversary of man. Therefore I view the claim Satan is "a type of Christ" as heretical foolishness.

But I can see at least two other ways of viewing the issue. One is that Satan is God's accuser or adversary. The other is considering that Jesus literally became sin (literally became an unholy, evil, act of rebellion against God) and trying to develop a fuller theory to narrate the error.

Open to discussion:

Is Satan a "type of Christ"?
I can well understand how one's traditions might prevent one from accepting this remarkable typology, but facts are facts. What was nailed to the pole and hoisted up in place was not a lamb, as one might expect, but a fiery serpent. Where have we seen a fiery serpent before? In Revelation 13. It's there. Everyone who looked at the serpent was healed from the penalty for their rebellion against God (Numbers 21:9). How can looking at a representation of Satan heal people in that way? But the Lord Jesus says, "And this is the will of Him who sent Me that everyone who sees the Son and believes in Him may have everlasting life" (John 6:40; c.f. also Isaiah 45:22).

It is a cardinal point about types that they cannot be pressed too far. If we say that Isaac or Joseph or David is a type of Christ, we do not mean that these people correspond exactly with our Lord in every way. Of course they don't. But we are able to see in the lives of these people a clear resemblance in certain respects to the Lord Jesus that is invaluable in preaching from the O.T.

So I would just encourage people to lay aside their traditions and preconceptions and look at the Scriptures to see that the brazen serpent is a representation of Satan and a clear type of Christ made sin for us that we might become the righteousness of God in Him.

Let's look at the history behind that brazen serpent. The Israelites committed sin against God and God sent serpents among them that bit them which resulted in death. Moses was instructed to make a brazen serpent and place it upon a pole. So the serpents are directly related to death. Satan came into this world in the form of a serpent in Genesis 3. Eve was deceived by him and partook of the tree that would result in death. Adam willingly partook with Eve and so death cam into the world in direct relationship with Satan in the form of a serpent. So, the serpent is a true type of Satan in relationship to death.

Moses was instructed to tell the people that if they simply looked upon the brazen serpent they would not die but live. Jesus takes this brazen serpent and applies it directly to himself in John 3:14-15. Hence, the brazen serpent is also a type of Christ in relationship to removal of death as it is a type of Satan in relationship with the cause of death. The connection between Satan and Christ with regard to the symbol of the serpent is sin and death. The former is the cause while the latter is the solution.

Now, follow closely. On the cross when Christ was "made to be sin for us" it was the destruction of Satan, sin and death. So, the common symbol for both Satan and Christ on the cross is comprehensive of Satan as the cause of sin and death and Christ as the solution of sin and death.
 

church mouse guy

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
I don't think Satan has anything to do with things. Jesus defeated sin, death, and hell. Satan a fallen angel will be locked up in hell forever when time stops.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top