1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Featured What edition of the KJV/AV...?

Discussion in 'Bible Versions & Translations' started by PastoralMusings, Feb 26, 2019.

  1. PastoralMusings

    PastoralMusings Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2015
    Messages:
    117
    Likes Received:
    44
    I am doing some writing and the editors wish to keep everything uniform. For whatever reason, they prefer to use the Scofield 1917. I do not know what edition of the KJV/AV that is used in the 1917 Scofield.
    Does anyone have an answer?
    Thanks,
    Jason
     
  2. McCree79

    McCree79 Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2015
    Messages:
    2,232
    Likes Received:
    305
    Faith:
    Baptist
    I believe that it is the "pure cambridge" 1900 KJV edition. If you have the you version Bible app, that is the edition it uses.

    Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
     
  3. PastoralMusings

    PastoralMusings Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2015
    Messages:
    117
    Likes Received:
    44
    Thanks. I'll try it out to see if that works.
    I was wondering if it was 1769, but couldn't find it in Logos or OnlineBible to compare.
     
  4. McCree79

    McCree79 Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2015
    Messages:
    2,232
    Likes Received:
    305
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Logos also uses the 1900 KJV.

    Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
     
  5. PastoralMusings

    PastoralMusings Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2015
    Messages:
    117
    Likes Received:
    44
    Yes. I typically use Cambridge Paragraph Bible/1873. I can set my copy tool to use 1900. Thanks.
     
    • Friendly Friendly x 1
  6. Jerome

    Jerome Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2006
    Messages:
    9,838
    Likes Received:
    702
    Faith:
    Baptist
    • Like Like x 1
  7. McCree79

    McCree79 Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2015
    Messages:
    2,232
    Likes Received:
    305
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Nice find.

    It appears I was wrong. Looks like Scofield used the 1769 Oxford

    Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
     
  8. Logos1560

    Logos1560 Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2004
    Messages:
    6,602
    Likes Received:
    464
    Faith:
    Baptist
    In my opinion, the KJV edition in the original 1917 Scofield Reference Bible was an Oxford-based edition, not a Cambridge edition. Some newer editions of the Scofield Reference Bible with an additional 1996 copyright switched to a Cambridge edition.

    So far, I have not found another KJV edition that is 100% identical to the KJV text in the 1917 Scofield Reference Bible. It uses some hyphens like pre-1769 Oxford editions, but overall it is a post-1769 Oxford KJV edition. It has a few unique renderings that are not found in most KJV editions.
     
    • Winner Winner x 1
    • Prayers Prayers x 1
  9. McCree79

    McCree79 Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2015
    Messages:
    2,232
    Likes Received:
    305
    Faith:
    Baptist
    I believe you are correct. I posted recognizing my mistake. It does seem that the 1769 is correct.

    Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
     
  10. PastoralMusings

    PastoralMusings Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2015
    Messages:
    117
    Likes Received:
    44
    Ok. Thanks, y'all.
    I'll just use the 1769 and let the editors deal with anything that they feel the need to standardize.

    It is interesting, in reading about the editions of the KJV, to see that there has never actually been a standard, even though I suppose 1769 and 1873 both came close to being such.
     
  11. Deacon

    Deacon Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2002
    Messages:
    9,760
    Likes Received:
    1,337
    Faith:
    Baptist
    • Like Like x 1
    • Informative Informative x 1
  12. Logos1560

    Logos1560 Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2004
    Messages:
    6,602
    Likes Received:
    464
    Faith:
    Baptist
    The edition of the KJV in the old 1917 Scofield Reference Bible had some unique or different renderings that could be said to characterize it [“and all that” (Lev. 14:36), “unto the coast“ (Deut. 3:14), “And when thou dost” (Deut. 24:10), “hastened” (1 Sam. 17:48), “people of the men” (2 Sam. 16:15), “the Lord“ (1 Kings 8:56, Jer. 32:26), “anything” (Rom. 8:33), “lusteth” (Rev. 18:14), “burnt-offerings” (Gen. 8:20)].

    The last example is to point out that the KJV edition in the Scofield Reference Bible had a number of hyphens to combine some words that are not found in most present KJV editions. Some KJV editions in the 1700's or 1800's did have many more hyphens than present KJV editions have.

    In my partial examination of over 500 editions of the KJV, I have not found any earlier KJV editions that had all of the renderings that characterize the edition in the 1917 Scofield.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  13. Logos1560

    Logos1560 Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2004
    Messages:
    6,602
    Likes Received:
    464
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Some editions of the KJV online that are identified as being the 1769 are not actually 100% identical to the 1769 Oxford edition of the KJV. There would be as many as 400 differences between the text in the actual 1769 Oxford edition of the KJV and that in a post-1900 Oxford KJV edition.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  14. Deacon

    Deacon Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2002
    Messages:
    9,760
    Likes Received:
    1,337
    Faith:
    Baptist
  15. PastoralMusings

    PastoralMusings Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2015
    Messages:
    117
    Likes Received:
    44
  16. Logos1560

    Logos1560 Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2004
    Messages:
    6,602
    Likes Received:
    464
    Faith:
    Baptist
    I have a KJV edition printed in 1769 at Cambridge that I obtained through EBay several years ago.

    The one that I have has a unique KJV text. It has some of the new renderings introduced in the 1769 Oxford edition, suggesting that someone at Cambridge may have learned of some of the changes that would be introduced in the 1769 Oxford. It also has several of the renderings that characterize the 1743/1762 Cambridge KJV editions. It has a few unique renderings of its own, perhaps unintentionally introduced by the printer.
     
    • Like Like x 2
  17. Deacon

    Deacon Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2002
    Messages:
    9,760
    Likes Received:
    1,337
    Faith:
    Baptist
    That little Bible sold for ~$114 (if you include shipping to the US) - no bargain for the winner.

    Rob
     
    • Like Like x 1
  18. PastoralMusings

    PastoralMusings Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2015
    Messages:
    117
    Likes Received:
    44
    It wasn’t this feller. It was out of my reach.
     
  19. Logos1560

    Logos1560 Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2004
    Messages:
    6,602
    Likes Received:
    464
    Faith:
    Baptist
    In one sense, it may have been a bargain, at least compared to what it would cost to obtain an actual KJV edition printed in Oxford in 1769.

    An actual 1769 Oxford can cost thousands if one can be even found that is available. I once examined a 1762 Cambridge KJV edition for which the seller wanted over $1000. The 1762 Cambridge was considered a new standard KJV edition, but it was later discovered that many of the new renderings that characterize the 1762 were actually introduced in the 1743 Cambridge. The 1769 Cambridge also has the new renderings that characterize the 1743/1762 Cambridge.

    Typically in the 1700's and 1800's many more copies of Oxford editions of the KJV were printed, making them less rare than copies of Cambridge editions of which fewer copies were printed. In the case of the 1769 Oxford, a warehouse fire is said to have destroyed a lot of the printed copies, making it rarer than most Oxford editions. The 1769 Oxford is also considered a standard KJV edition, making it an edition wanted by Bible collectors.
     
    #19 Logos1560, Mar 9, 2019
    Last edited: Mar 9, 2019
    • Like Like x 1
  20. Logos1560

    Logos1560 Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2004
    Messages:
    6,602
    Likes Received:
    464
    Faith:
    Baptist
    The 1743 Cambridge edition already has a majority of the renderings and spellings that could be or are considered to be characteristic of the later 1762 Cambridge edition [“men” (Gen. 47:6), “consecration” (Exod. 29:16), “hath sinned” (Lev. 5:10), “shall they be” (Num. 3:13), “one silver bowl” (Num. 7:61), “and ye shall have” (Deut. 4:25), “all lost things“ (Deut. 22:3), “and the Gadites” (Josh. 12:6), “nor of Halbah” (Jud. 1:31), “that” before “after the year” omitted (2 Sam. 11:1), “eightieth” (1 Kings 6:1), “Asa‘s heart” (1 Kings 15:14), “thou thyself hast” (1 Kings 20:40), “until now” (2 Kings 8:6), “all the business” (1 Chron. 26:30), “whom God alone” (1 Chron. 29:1), “rulers of“ (1 Chron. 29:6), “Charchemish“ (2 Chron. 35:20), “and the gold” (Ezra 7:18), “Mordecai‘s matters” (Esther 3:4), “and he seeth“ (Job 8:17), “and he saveth” (Ps. 107:19), “these things” (Ps. 107:43) “children shall also sit” (Ps. 132:12), “merchant ships” (Prov. 30:31), “farther” (Eccl. 8:17), “gone to” (Isa. 15:2), “feedeth on ashes” (Isa. 44:20), “is” (Jer. 1:13), “The word that” (Jer. 40:1), “the whirlwind” (Hos. 13:3), “and he kept” (Amos 1:11), “Hamath“ (Amos 6:14), “hidden things“ (Obadiah 1:6), “fleeth away“ (Nahum 3:16), “casteth out devils” (Matt. 9:34), “in the judgement” (Matt. 12:41), “had no root“ (Matt. 13:6), “the Christ” (Matt. 16:16), “eternal life“ (Matt. 19:29), “farther“ (Matt. 26:39), “word” (Matt. 26:75), “bodies of the saints“ (Matt. 27:52), “farther“ (Mark 1:19), “afterwards“ (Luke 4:2), “and he cried out” (Luke 4:33), “lifted” (Luke 16:23), “a third” (Luke 20:12), “his lord” (John 15:20), “but the time” (John 16:25), “doctor of the law” (Acts 5:34), “killedst” (Acts 7:28), “And they wrote” (Acts 15:23), “from things strangled” (Acts 21:25), “and in the prophets” (Acts 24:14), “sitting on” (Acts 25:6), “and have gained” (Acts 27:21), “have not charity” (1 Cor. 13:2), “in utterance” (2 Cor. 8:7), “in knowledge” (2 Cor. 8:7), “those who” (Gal. 2:6), “access“ (Eph. 2:18), “and I beseech” (Phil. 4:2), “our‘s“ (Titus 3:14), “be ye warmed and be ye filled” (James 2:16), “labourers who“ (James 5:4), “inhabitants“ (Rev. 17:2), “on either side” (Rev. 22:2)]. Some of the new changes in 1743 became standard in later KJV editions while others did not.

    There are some variations or changes found in the 1743 Cambridge edition that are not in the 1762 Cambridge [“unleavened bread” (Lev. 7:13), “among the people” (Num. 5:21), “their tents” (Num. 9:18), “or of vines” (Num. 20:5), “did sacrifice and burn” (2 Kings 14:4), “mercy’s sake” (Ps. 6:4), “Canaan” (Acts 13:19)].
     
Loading...