Featured The ONE FACT that stops KJVO in its tracks...

At least in part because you keep creating such threads ad nauseam!! It would be interesting to check your church and see which practices you all have that also fit the TOTAL LACK OF SCRIPTURAL SUPPORT category. Perhaps you haven't started any threads on those subjects, since this one appears to be your hobby horse.

 

Quite obviously, since I chose to comment -- pointing out the obvious, that the one complaining about ad nauseam is part of the reason for the ad nauseam.

As far as false myths with TOTAL LACK OF SCRIPTURAL SUPPORT that aren't about the KJVO ad nauseam, you might start a thread about your belief that God created someone else for Cain to marry, if I remember correctly what you advocated elsewhere.

 

You're making up a false equivalence here. KJVO believe that their translation was divinely inspired and overrules all other translations which are demonic in comparison. Many KJVO believe that this divine inspiration means that the KJB (as they like to call it) is even free of transcriptional errors.

Among the many problems with this belief are cockatrices and unicorns. Sorry, but the translators knew what a rhinoceros was and weren't thinking unicorn = rhinoceros. They wrote in these mythical creatures in the Bible knowing that they were mythical creatures.

But even the most definitive evidence won't convince a lunatic. They will commonly present a red-herring to distract. Facts will cease to exist, history will be rewritten, and nothing will change their mind. This is the reason why there are still flat-earthers.

I don't believe robycop3 said that he discovered in a dream or was divinely inspired to know that Cain's wife was made by God. I'm not going to look it up but he was likely just giving his opinion about what happened in the gaps of the Biblical narrative. He didn't think Cain married his sister or niece, so he decided that God must have made him a wife.

Doing this does not claim authoritative divine inspiration as KJVO claims. He is simply giving an opinion as to what happened. If I said I think Cain took a dump sometime in his life, I'm not claiming divine inspiration even though it's not in the Bible. And yes, you could say that Cain taking a dump has a TOTAL LACK OF SCRIPTURAL SUPPORT!!, but it's not the same.

KJVO's claim of authoritative divine inspiration above all other translations which are demonic in comparison is not the same as giving an opinion that fills in the gap of a narrative.

 

Actually, no, because I am not saying they are equivalent, just trying to make a point to roby about his making a big deal in capital letters about TOTAL LACK OF SCRIPTURAL SUPPORT when he is talking about others but never turns it back in introspection (as far as I have noticed).

Which contradicts what the Bible says, unlike the "false equivalence" of saying "Cain took a dump sometime in his life" -- which is not mentioned in scripture but wouldn't contradict anything in it.

 

Yes, this is called red herring. You are trying to distract from the content of the OP.

You didn't understand why this is a false equivalence. It's not simply that what robycop3 believes and KJVO believes lacks scriptural support. They both completely lack scriptural support.

The difference is when KJVO demands that KJB is divinely inspired and authoritative and that other writings are demonic in comparison. If robycop3 also said he was granted his knowledge with a vision from God and that we could not oppose or disagree with it, then we would have a true equivalence.

Allow me to clarify - I do not mind KJVP. I only oppose KJVO.

 

Well, the topic certainly doesn't get enough play here, does it.

 

I intended to move on with life, but got to thinking about this while mowing the yard. I'll finish what I have to say and then leave the thread to you and roby and whoever else wants to discuss it.

I actually addressed something that was in the OP, unlike your quote below which adds facts roby did not put in evidence. He complained about ad nauseam. So did I. If you check his posts you will find KJVO is a constant theme he addresses. If he doesn't want to beat the dead horse, he could lay down the stick. Here is a sampling of some KJVO threads he started:

• The "Psalm 12:6-7 thingie"
• IFB & the KJVO myth...
• Man-made Doctrines of faith/worship 2
• The ONE QUESTION KJVOs can't correctly answer...
• What's the AUTHORITY for "King-James-Version-Only"?
• Your KJVO myth is false.

These are just the threads he started whose titles are pretty obviously on the subject, not counting others that may descend into it, or his posts on threads someone else started.

Ultimately, he is free to start threads on the topic, while at the same time complaining about some aspect of it going on ad nauseam. I am free to complain about his complaining, and you are free to complain about my complaining about his complaining -- at least as long as the Board allows us that freedom.

I certainly woulldn't say roby doesn't agree with what you say here, but he didn't mention it in the OP, neither have I noticed him mentioning it elsewhere. He is pretty steady and consistent with his stick with which he beats the horse. KJVO is a myth. It isn't found in Scripture, and on and on ad nauseam! Here are a few examples that will be recognized.

In the man-made doctrines thread he wrote (emp. mine), "A man-made doctrine of faith/worship is any doctrine or point that's not derived from Scripture. And that includes those made by mens' twisting of Scripture to try to make it fit their invention...Personally, I don't believe ANY such doctrine, and won't hesitate to call it false and rag on it." So, yes, if he is going to dish it out, he also needs to take it. Roby needs to own the fact that he claims he doesn't believe any doctrine not derived from Scripture. IMO, all this is relevant to his "version's guitar" which only has one string and no frets.

I'll leave you all with the final word, words and posts. That's all I'm going to say on the subject at this time.

 

I’m not KJVO, but in the interest of fairness need to state that not all KJVO hold to secondary inspiration, as though the translators were inspired.

 

Please don't minimize Robycop's troubling concocted theory of non-Adamic humans like that.
He was saying it'd happened post-Flood as well, had something to do with his race views:

 

But that was not my point. I simply spoke of fairness, which certainly deserves a showing among God’s people.