There are those within every appendage of Evangelical Christendom who claim to be "in Christ." Pity they have such weak reading skills and spiritual integrity.
1.) A tenet of hermeneutics specifies no single Scriptural site is to be used to form a valid Doctrine or Theology. 2 Cor. 5:17 is the only place giving the phrase of a human being placed "in Christ."
2.) Those who are proud to dance with grammar and with busy verbation try to equate the influence of the Holy Spirit with being "in Christ." That is not a consistent ideology in Scripture outside of nonapostle Paul's imagination. The Holy Spirit spoke through Balaam's ass, and through sinful Samson, neither of which were "in Christ."
3.) No self ascribed Believer can even reliably describe what are the means and effects of being "in Christ." They merely ramble with speculations.
4.) Predestination for being elected by God includes those who are without the Holy Spirit and not "in Christ," even possibly for their entire lives.
5.) "In Christ" states one is living without any sins of either commission or omission, because Christ was sinless. Jesus stated one can be His friend only if they obey His Commands. No such person exists. Jesus said nothing about "trying" to obey His Commands. His Commands either are or are not obeyed.
"In Christ" is a bandied phrase, favored by those who rest upon churchy sounding aphorisms. Stand two people up together, with one claiming to be "in Christ" and the other not claiming so, and they are indistinguishable. There is no Scripture specifying those with obedience both to Jesus' Commands and to the Will of The Father are a priori "in Christ."
1.) A tenet of hermeneutics specifies no single Scriptural site is to be used to form a valid Doctrine or Theology. 2 Cor. 5:17 is the only place giving the phrase of a human being placed "in Christ."
2.) Those who are proud to dance with grammar and with busy verbation try to equate the influence of the Holy Spirit with being "in Christ." That is not a consistent ideology in Scripture outside of nonapostle Paul's imagination. The Holy Spirit spoke through Balaam's ass, and through sinful Samson, neither of which were "in Christ."
3.) No self ascribed Believer can even reliably describe what are the means and effects of being "in Christ." They merely ramble with speculations.
4.) Predestination for being elected by God includes those who are without the Holy Spirit and not "in Christ," even possibly for their entire lives.
5.) "In Christ" states one is living without any sins of either commission or omission, because Christ was sinless. Jesus stated one can be His friend only if they obey His Commands. No such person exists. Jesus said nothing about "trying" to obey His Commands. His Commands either are or are not obeyed.
"In Christ" is a bandied phrase, favored by those who rest upon churchy sounding aphorisms. Stand two people up together, with one claiming to be "in Christ" and the other not claiming so, and they are indistinguishable. There is no Scripture specifying those with obedience both to Jesus' Commands and to the Will of The Father are a priori "in Christ."