If you challenge Darwinism, you challenge everything about Progressivism

[Revmitchell]

Greetings from the world of science! (that will be promptly ignored or attacked by progressives due to lacking in sufficient woke magic):

Click here to get news you can trust sent right to your inbox. It's free!" style="color: rgb(255, 0, 45); text-decoration-line: underline; font-family: acumin-pro-semi-condensed, " arial", " sans-serif;"; word-break: break-word; padding-right: 2px; padding-left: 2px; transition: all 200ms ease 0s; font-weight: 700; border-bottom: 0px !important; font-size: 17px !important;">Ditch the fake news ==> Click here to get news you can trust sent right to your inbox. It's free!
A professor from no less than Yale University has stuck a fork in one of the leftist intellectual establishment's primary cornerstones. Basically, David Gelernter says Darwinism is for suckers.

Then he added that not only is Darwinism insufficient and outdated science, but it has also reached the point of unstable religiosity among his peers.

And as if the computer science wizard didn't have enough of a death wish, he went even further and said that Intelligent Design — one of academia's favorite whipping boys over the course of the last decade-plus — is an argument that must be taken seriously and is not simply the product of religious imagination.

If you challenge Darwinism, you challenge everything about Progressivism

 

[Alan Gross]

Greetings from the world of science! (that will be promptly ignored or attacked by progressives due to lacking in sufficient woke magic):

Click here to get news you can trust sent right to your inbox. It's free!" style="color: rgb(255, 0, 45); text-decoration-line: underline; font-family: acumin-pro-semi-condensed, " arial", " sans-serif;"; word-break: break-word; padding-right: 2px; padding-left: 2px; transition: all 200ms ease 0s; font-weight: 700; border-bottom: 0px !important; font-size: 17px !important;">Ditch the fake news ==> Click here to get news you can trust sent right to your inbox. It's free!
A professor from no less than Yale University has stuck a fork in one of the leftist intellectual establishment's primary cornerstones. Basically, David Gelernter says Darwinism is for suckers.

Then he added that not only is Darwinism insufficient and outdated science, but it has also reached the point of unstable religiosity among his peers.

And as if the computer science wizard didn't have enough of a death wish, he went even further and said that Intelligent Design — one of academia's favorite whipping boys over the course of the last decade-plus — is an argument that must be taken seriously and is not simply the product of religious imagination.

If you challenge Darwinism, you challenge everything about Progressivism

The perfect annihilation of 'Evolution', or 'Darwinism', is to not assume it.

It is gone.

Just like that.

If it is not 'assumed', there is nothing to recommend it, even as a Theory, or even as a very rediculous, anti-scientific, theory, for 'suckers', as the man said, at every point.

Two developments can not exist and every piece of dust or adam Testifies to God's Creation.

There is no 'evolution', and there is no evidence for it, for one very good reason.

There CAN NOT be.

And THERE IS NOT.

 

[church mouse guy]

Greetings from the world of science! (that will be promptly ignored or attacked by progressives due to lacking in sufficient woke magic):

Click here to get news you can trust sent right to your inbox. It's free!" style="color: rgb(255, 0, 45); text-decoration-line: underline; font-family: acumin-pro-semi-condensed, " arial", " sans-serif;"; word-break: break-word; padding-right: 2px; padding-left: 2px; transition: all 200ms ease 0s; font-weight: 700; border-bottom: 0px !important; font-size: 17px !important;">Ditch the fake news ==> Click here to get news you can trust sent right to your inbox. It's free!
A professor from no less than Yale University has stuck a fork in one of the leftist intellectual establishment's primary cornerstones. Basically, David Gelernter says Darwinism is for suckers.

Then he added that not only is Darwinism insufficient and outdated science, but it has also reached the point of unstable religiosity among his peers.

And as if the computer science wizard didn't have enough of a death wish, he went even further and said that Intelligent Design — one of academia's favorite whipping boys over the course of the last decade-plus — is an argument that must be taken seriously and is not simply the product of religious imagination.

If you challenge Darwinism, you challenge everything about Progressivism

Gelernter doesn't say it is for suckers. He says that it is mathematically and scientifically impossible. As one of the leading computer science experts in the world he does not stoop to name-calling.

This is your second thread on this topic. Gelernter's article was released in May.

 

[church mouse guy]

To find David Gelernter's white paper, search "Giving Up Darwin" and it was published in the spring on May 1, 2019, in the Claremont Review of Books.

Gelernter cites Stephen Meyer's book "Darwin's Doubt" (2013) as well as David Berlinski's book "The Deniable Darwin and Other Essays" (2009) and an anthology edited by David Klinghoffer entitled "Debating Darwin's Doubt" (2015). So Berlinaki was saying the same thing publically ten years ago but it was public knowledge that DNA and RNA and molecular biology made evolution impossible but these scientist issued the mathematical proof that evolution is impossible. The math could be done by a high school student.

 

[church mouse guy]

Here is the essential math, which as you can see, is within the reach of a high school student:

The total count of possible 150-link chains, where each link is chosen separately from 20 amino acids, is 20 to the 150th power. In other words, many. 20 to the 150th power roughly equals 10 to the 195th power, and there are only 10 to the 80th power atoms in the universe.

Giving Up Darwin

 

[MB]

It's really funny when grown men , educated men, believe there own lies. Like the Bible says the wise became fools.
MB

 

[Van]

Darwin's theory has been scientifically dead for years. But atheists have continued to ride it because "godless creation" is its central tenet. Now we have "Neo-Darwinism" which is like a broken down old car. They towed it to a garage, jacked up the radiator cap, parked a new vehicle under the cap, then screwed the cap on the totally different car. Every tenet of Darwinism has been shown to be as bogus as recapitulation, but the name (radiator cap) remains.