Featured Beth Moore

While that Tweet is nearly a year old she hasn't got better. As a church we have prohibited any Beth Moore materials for church use and recommend agaisnt anyone using it for personal use.

She will not be happy until the SBC is split or the SBC caves to egalitarianism, and intersectionality.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

 

Just follow Dr mac on what to do with her!

 

amazing how just following the scriptures helps out!

 

She will say Paul is authoritative...but Jesus is more authoritative and he trumps Paul.



Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

 

That tweet followed this one.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

 

Of course one was saying Paul is Jesus equal. They were saying all Scripture is equally authoritative and inerrant....which lead to these tweets.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

 

She would never admit that, but she is the queen of saying things and then following it up with things like, "I am just conveying the opinions of others that should be considered".

As she does when called out by Al Mohler.
She was called out on a direct promotion of egalitarianism....and her is her delfection.



Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

 

Here is her post that drew the attention of Mohler

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

 

Said like the enemy.

 

It's because she is the SBC's equivalent of the Pentecostal/Charismatic movement's Joyce Meyers.

In other words, when the SBC sees women seeking a female Bible teacher, they will steer members away from Joyce Meyers, and in the direction of Beth Moore.

That's my opinion, of course, but it's based on my personal experiences with members of the SBC.

 

This reminds me of many conversations I've had with practicing homosexuals who endeavor to reckon their chosen lifestyle with the claim that Christianity does not prohibit said behavior.

(I live and work in the San Francisco Bay Area, by the way).

When evangelizing, I have often been approached by these individuals, and presented with a tract consisting of multiple, folded pages.

On the front cover of the tract is the following question: "What did Jesus say about homosexuality?"

And then, when one takes the time to unfold the tract one has just been presented, one discovers that all the other pages in the tract are completely blank.

And when said individual is given the opportunity to elaborate on the contents of the tract, that person will go on about how the Apostle Paul (in his letters to the early Christian churches) supposedly "corrupted" the gospel as originally presented by Jesus.

In other words, that he "added" to the Good News with his own personal opinions, in order to influence the Churches to adopt his "false" teachings regarding the Gospel.

 

Actually, Jesus did address the homosexual lifestyle by stating that the physical union is between a husband and wife.

 

I can't think of Beth Moore without being reminded that she spoke of a silent, saintly, Christian high school boy, who was being harassed simultaneously by two racial supremacist groups, as being "utterly antichrist and reeks of the vomit of Hell."

"We put limitations on women that exceeded what Christ demonstrated." This is a red-letter con, where the whole Bible is ignored except for what Jesus said/did himself. As already observed, homosexuals use it to defend proud homosexuals. But, as already observed, Jesus defined marriage as a man and a woman. And, Jesus demonstrated male-only leadership because 100% of his chosen Apostles were men.

The red-letter con seeks to replace the context of Jesus' words, the whole bible, with the context of lies promoting whatever doctrine a reprobate is pushing. But, Jesus treated all scripture as authoritative. Beth Moore wants us to look at the red letters in the context, bias, of modern feminism, rather than the context of the Bible. Beth Moore is utterly antichrist and reeks of the vomit of Hell.

 

Same Jesus though stated marriage between one man and one woman!