Yes, they do.
Some also, like me, waffle between "elect" and "the race of men"...
But long ago I determined that it could not mean " each and every man woman and child" because of what Psalms 5:5, Psalms 11:5, Proverbs 6:16-19, Romans 9:13 and many others clearly teach...
That God actually does hate the wicked and love the righteous.
That He will indeed cast the wicked into Hell and eternal torment, and it isn't because He loves them in the eternal sense.
So, when I read John 1:9-10, here is what I see:
"[That] was the true Light, which lighteth every man that cometh into the world.
10 He was in the world, and the world was made by him, and the world knew him not."
1) The first occurrence of "world" means "existence" in the material plane. This planet Earth, flesh and blood, born into "the world".
2) Same thing.
3) Earth.
4) Earth and all who dwell on it. The world of men.
Don't ask me why I understand it this way, I just do.
I disagree, and I imagine that you already knew I was going to.
The reasons are complex, but it has to do with God's love and how it is defined, and who it is shown to by His actions.
I admit that John 3:16 by itself can ( and almost without fail, does ) be used to show that God loves all mankind in the eternal sense...
But when other passages are brought to bear, I see that idea falling apart.
I have a question. Maybe more than one.
For God so loved the world.
On the day, Paul and ever how many were going down that road to Damascus, how many out of that group can we say for sure God was calling according to purpose?
What purpose?
Was the purpose, salvation? Salvation for just that, one, we know of for sure?
Why out of that group, why only one believed?
Why was it just Paul was able to see the light and reach down by his own accord and pull himself upright by his own faith and believe? Isn't that what we in reality believe that Paul was the only one able to muster up the faith to be saved and or save himself?