1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Featured Trail of Blood

Discussion in 'General Baptist Discussions' started by sag38, Oct 14, 2020.

  1. canadyjd

    canadyjd Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2005
    Messages:
    13,411
    Likes Received:
    1,761
    Faith:
    Baptist
    One good consideration as to whether John baptized the disciples of Jesus is one of authority.

    When Jesus came for baptism John at first refused. The one with greater authority baptized, and John recognized that. Jesus insisted, saying it fulfilled righteousness. The Holy Spirit descending like a dove upon Jesus demonstrated that Jesus had the greater authority, though John fulfilled his role as the forerunner.

    At that point, for the disciples of Jesus to submit to the baptism of John might be interpreted as John having greater authority than Jesus.

    John, himself, stated that he (his ministry) must decrease and Jesus (His ministry) must increase.

    That is an admission of the greater authority of Jesus that might be obscured if His disciples submitted to John’s baptism.

    peace to you
     
  2. 37818

    37818 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2018
    Messages:
    17,826
    Likes Received:
    1,363
    Faith:
    Baptist
    The only ones said to baptize before Pentecost was John the Baptist and Jesus, by way of His disciples.(John 4:1-2). There is no reason to suppose any of Jesus' followers prior to the cross were not baptised or one or the other baptisms were not "Christian" in following Jesus.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  3. Salty

    Salty 20,000 Posts Club
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2003
    Messages:
    38,981
    Likes Received:
    2,616
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Thanks for the catch- (at least I thought I was awake!)
    I did edit my comments


    I'm confident that all apostles were baptized
    but I am of the school that it is not important who does the baptizing., rather it is important that we are properly baptized - ie immersion, reason for being baptized, ect.

    Sure if you are joining First Bapt of Atlanta - it would be great to be baptized by Dr Stanely - but in the 20th century - what % of new members has he personally baptized?
     
  4. RighteousnessTemperance&

    RighteousnessTemperance& Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2017
    Messages:
    7,359
    Likes Received:
    1,465
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Someone may want to build a further case based on John’s baptism, but it is unreasonable to think the apostles were not baptized by John the Baptist. The only Jews we know of who were not were religious leaders, extreme opposites to the apostles.

    The apostles were expectantly looking for the Messiah, and were open-minded enough to listen to Jesus. John was the chosen one who prepared the way, people went out to him, and he baptized them, even those who many may have disliked, for example, publicans.

    John’s ministry was far too important, had far too much impact to think that Jews expectantly awaiting the Messiah would not respond to his message. The character of the apostles argues against the idea that they would not have also responded and been baptized.
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Agree Agree x 1
  5. Salty

    Salty 20,000 Posts Club
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2003
    Messages:
    38,981
    Likes Received:
    2,616
    Faith:
    Baptist
    I will repeat myself - if it was that important - Scripture would have so mention.

    Who knows, maybe Peter thought he had to get into the act!
     
  6. Mikey

    Mikey Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2018
    Messages:
    765
    Likes Received:
    112
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Hey,

    I'm not aware of any specific works that refute Trail of Blood. Trail of Blood isn't really that widely held (if at all) where im from. Best I can do is to recommend really church history books, Nick Needham's (a baptist minister) 2000 years of Christs power.
     
  7. Salty

    Salty 20,000 Posts Club
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2003
    Messages:
    38,981
    Likes Received:
    2,616
    Faith:
    Baptist
    You can check some of the links on this Wiki about the Trail of Blood.

    Now, If I am not mistiaken - many -if not most - Landmarkds are KJO.
    IF so, one of those tennents - is that the KJV does NOT have a copyright.
    (Not sure how they explain that the Royal Family of England does have a copyright)
    Yet the Landmarks DO have a copyright on The ToB!

    I think I have a ToB somewhere - but what I would like to see are the references/footnotes.
     
  8. rlvaughn

    rlvaughn Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2001
    Messages:
    10,544
    Likes Received:
    1,558
    Faith:
    Baptist
    I think I understand where you are coming from, but at the same time cannot find that John was a God-sent heaven-authorized man who baptized all who heard his message and was the only such baptizer until Jesus's disciples also started baptizing.

    On that latter subject, I would be curious to know, from those to whom it applies, whether the baptisms performed by the disciples of Jesus (John 3:22; John 4:1-2) before Pentecost were or were not "Christian baptism."

    In this I believe you are mistaken. For example, the two largest bodies that hold Landmark ecclesiology -- the American Baptist Association and the Baptist Missionary Association of America -- are not KJVO. (However, this does not mean they may have member churches who are.) These represent probably 3000 to 4000 churches. In general they believe in the plenary verbal inspiration and inerrancy of the Bible as originally written. My take is that the leading schools and leading preachers are not pro-KJV, but due to the generally conservative nature of the people, their doctrine, and their practice, the rank-and-file often have a specific preference for the King James Bible. This is probably changing as the older generation passes.

    I think you will tend to find that the more vocal KJVO Landmark Baptists are usually independent. It is hard to know just how many churches this might be.
     
  9. rlvaughn

    rlvaughn Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2001
    Messages:
    10,544
    Likes Received:
    1,558
    Faith:
    Baptist
    This almost seems to be a case of trying to build an extra wall of defense against possible wrong implications of John's baptism.
     
  10. rlvaughn

    rlvaughn Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2001
    Messages:
    10,544
    Likes Received:
    1,558
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Mikey, these appear to be what you are referring to, right?
    2000 Years of Christ's Power, 4 Vols. (Needham)
     
  11. Mikey

    Mikey Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2018
    Messages:
    765
    Likes Received:
    112
    Faith:
    Baptist
    #51 Mikey, Oct 20, 2020
    Last edited: Oct 20, 2020
  12. Salty

    Salty 20,000 Posts Club
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2003
    Messages:
    38,981
    Likes Received:
    2,616
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Thus the reason for being extremly careful as to how I phrased the question.
    However, possibly - 30-50 years ago most may have been KJO - but in the last decade or 2 -
    the younger generation of pastors may have reconsidered that position.

    But the whole point was that KJO believes in no copyright - but they have no problem with ToB having a copyright.

    Every Baptist church is independent - even us Southern Baptist!
     
  13. Jerome

    Jerome Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2006
    Messages:
    9,838
    Likes Received:
    702
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Independent? independent of what?

    The term independent Baptist has an established meaning: = not being affiliated with the Convention (Northern or Southern).
     
  14. Jerome

    Jerome Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2006
    Messages:
    9,838
    Likes Received:
    702
    Faith:
    Baptist
    The longtime publisher of the Trail of Blood: Ashland Ave. Baptist, was commended by Albert Mohler for its strong historical emphasis:

    2016 Centennial of Ashland Avenue Baptist Church

    "'God has made us chronological creatures. We think necessarily in terms of past, present and future. That's why history is so important to us. That is why I am so honored to celebrate with Ashland Avenue Baptist Church, your 100th anniversary, past, present and future,' Mohler said."

    "'Few churches not only have the history of your church, but few actually have the intentionality in that history as well,' he continued. 'There is a very clear identity to Ashland Avenue Baptist Church, committed from the very beginning to the faith once for all delivered to the saints.'"



    FYI & FWIW:

    Pastor David Prince, Ashland Avenue Baptist Church

    Pastor David E. Prince "came to Ashland in November 2003....He received is M.Div from Southwestern Theological Seminary and his Ph.D from the Southern Baptist Theological Seminary. In addition to his role at Ashland, he is also an Associate Professor for Christian Preaching and Pastoral Ministry at the Southern Baptist Theological Seminary in Louisville, KY."

    [Prince's predecessor at Ashland Ave. was Hershael York, who's now the Dean of SBTS's School of Theology!]

    Prince is also chairman of the board of trustees of the SBC's Ethics and Religious Liberty Commission! He's been one of Russell Moore's strongest defenders:

    Feb 21, 2020 • ERLC Upset It's Being Investigated

    "In an open letter...ERLC trustee officers called the task force...'unwarranted, divisive, and disrespectful'. Signed by ERLC Board of Trustees chairman David Prince and the board’s other officers, the letter...included a statement of support for ERLC president Russell Moore."
     
  15. Salty

    Salty 20,000 Posts Club
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2003
    Messages:
    38,981
    Likes Received:
    2,616
    Faith:
    Baptist
    NO! NO! NO! - Independent means that no outside organization has any authority over a local church.

    So what you are saying if you support a missionary - that is affiliation.
    If you fellowship with another local independent church - that is affiliation
    If you work with an organization - say - Sword of the Lord - that is affiliation
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  16. Salty

    Salty 20,000 Posts Club
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2003
    Messages:
    38,981
    Likes Received:
    2,616
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Independent means that no outside organization has any authority over a local church.

    So if the mission board requires the missionary to provide - say - 10% of his support for mission board expenses --- that is control

    If the church you visit - for fellowship - lets say they have a policy of no eating in the church auditorium - that is control

    If the Sword will not allow you to advertise the fact - say - you use Chick Publications - that is control [/QUOTE]
     
    • Useful Useful x 1
  17. rlvaughn

    rlvaughn Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2001
    Messages:
    10,544
    Likes Received:
    1,558
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Not really, if talking about the ABA and BMAA. The former has a seminary here in our county seat town, and the latter has a seminary in a neighboring county. 30-50 years ago they were not KJVO, and the former was pretty virulently anti-KJVO (though they kept their talking points in check outside the seminary).
    I don't think there is much correlation here, even for those who make a point about the KJV not being copyrighted. In one case they are talking about the word of God, and in the other the words of men.
    Yes, I understand any Baptist church is supposed to be independent. In context, I was contrasting churches in two associations I mentioned (ABA, BMAA) with churches that are not in any association. By the way, there are even Southern Baptists who are Landmarkers, and the author of The Trail of Blood was a Southern Baptist.

    James Milton Carroll (January 8, 1852 – January 10, 1931) was the son of Benajah and Mary Eliza Carroll. His father was a Baptist minister, as well as his better known older brother, Benajah Harvey (B.H.) Carroll.
    J. M. Carroll was a Baptist pastor, author, and educator. He was an amateur ornithologist, and reputedly owned one of the largest collections of bird eggs in the state Texas. Carroll founded the Education Commission of the Baptist General Convention of Texas. He was a founder and the first president of San Marcos Baptist Academy, and was president of both Oklahoma Baptist University and Howard Payne University. I think he worked in some way at some time for both the Texas Baptist & Herald (periodical) and Baylor University.

    In addition to his well-known book The Trail of Blood, he wrote several other books, including Texas Baptist Statistics (1896), A History of Texas Baptists, B. H. Carroll, The Colossus of Baptist History, and Just Such a Time: Recollections of Childhood on the Texas Frontier, 1858-1867.
     
  18. Salty

    Salty 20,000 Posts Club
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2003
    Messages:
    38,981
    Likes Received:
    2,616
    Faith:
    Baptist
    If a church is affiliated with the BMAA or ABA - then they are associated. So, do you mean that church is not in a local association - only the National association/convention/Fellowship/Alliance. Whether it is local, State or national - it makes no difference. Makes me think in Germany - the current International Baptist Convention (English Speaking) orginaly the Association of Baptists in Continental Europe (ABCE) in 1964, and the name was changed to the European Baptist Convention (EBC). -- Anyways - it originate with only 2 SBC churches!

    Going back to my "carefully worded statement" the Majority (if not all) of Landmarkers that I knew - were all King James only.

    About the only "power" that a association/convention/Fellowship/Alliance has over a local independent church is to withdraw fellowship.


    As far as the ToB being copyrighted - esp since it is over 100 years old - why should they worry about a copyright - My thinking is that if they believe that strongly - they would want wide distribution of that booklet.
     
  19. rlvaughn

    rlvaughn Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2001
    Messages:
    10,544
    Likes Received:
    1,558
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Most churches in the ABA and BMAA associate with their local, state, and national bodies. However, some do not always participate in all three.
    Ultimately you would have to ask whoever holds the copyright. A couple of things. A general rule of thumb is that most things copyrighted before 1927 are now in the public domain. ToB was written in 1931.On the other hand, I notice two different recent printings of the book on Amazon, which makes me wonder who holds the copyright.

    CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform (February 11, 2015)
    Bible Nation Society, The (July 19, 2017)
     
  20. Squire Robertsson

    Squire Robertsson Administrator
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2000
    Messages:
    15,371
    Likes Received:
    2,405
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Many make ToB into something it isn't and has never been. ToB is a compilation of notes and the charts from Carroll's lectures he gave in various churches. It is not a comprehensive work.
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Informative Informative x 1
Loading...