The SCOTUS rejects bid to overturn Biden’s win in Pennsylvania

[KenH]

“The Supreme Court has rejected a bid by a Republican member of Congress and other GOP activists to overturn President-elect Joe Biden’s win in Pennsylvania.”

Supreme Court rejects bid to overturn Biden’s win in Pennsylvania

 

[RighteousnessTemperance&]

Seems this article is very misleading. Whodathunk?

 

[SGO]

American Liquidity Party wins again.

 

[KenH]

Seems this article is very misleading.

No, it's not. Just because you don't like the truth doesn't mean you can legitimately call it misleading or a lie. It is disappointing to see people selling their integrity for a bowl of Trump's filthy stew.

 

[RighteousnessTemperance&]

No, it's not. Just because you don't like the truth doesn't mean you can legitimately call it misleading or a lie. It is disappointing to see people selling their integrity for a bowl of Trump's filthy stew.

Just what do you think it says then?

 

[Benjamin]

The SCOTUS rejects bid to overturn Biden’s win in Pennsylvania

Wrong, its not over:

 

[KenH]

Just what do you think it says then?

 

[RighteousnessTemperance&]

View attachment 4488

Good. Now quote the portion of the article that actually explains that without obfuscating the rest of the issue.

Supreme Court rejects bid to overturn Biden’s win in Pennsylvania

 

[KenH]

Now quote the portion of the article that actually explains that without obfuscating the rest of the issue.

The one line ruling by the SCOTUS is clear and to the point. What else is there to add? If there is a point you are trying to make that I am not comprehending, please tell me what it is, if you will.

 

[RighteousnessTemperance&]

The one line ruling by the SCOTUS is clear and to the point. What else is there to add? If there is a point you are trying to make that I am not comprehending, please tell me what it is, if you will.

If there were nothing to add, then the article proves my point not yours, as all they did was add, and add, and add, but never anything to the point.

 

[KenH]

If there were nothing to add, then the article proves my point not yours, as they all they did was add, and add, and add, but never anything to the point.

Don't really understand what you mean, but that's okay. I think this subject has run out of steam anyway. Hard to talk a whole bunch about one sentence in a legal document. Hey, you have a great day, brother!

 

[RighteousnessTemperance&]

The one line ruling by the SCOTUS is clear and to the point. What else is there to add? If there is a point you are trying to make that I am not comprehending, please tell me what it is, if you will.

Guess the matter is clear for everyone but Cuomo & CNN.