1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Real Science Disproves Evolution Theory

Discussion in 'Creation vs. Evolution' started by Hark, Feb 3, 2021.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Hark

    Hark Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2014
    Messages:
    1,408
    Likes Received:
    63
    Faith:
    Baptist
    The definition of real science is hat can be observed & proven.

    The basis for a scientific theory to be valid is that the phenomenon has to be observed in the natural world.

    Evolutionists often roll out the theory of gravity as an example and drop a rock from their hand to fall to the earth as an example of observing the phenomenon of gravity for the theory of gravity to be valid.

    But...

    They cannot give you an example of macroevolution for anyone to observe in the natural world. Often, they give examples of the Law of Biogenesis ( life does not come from nothing; life comes from similar life ) which they had coined the term microevolution from; a fish is still a fish, it may become a different species of fish, but still a fish. That means the genetic information to grow legs is not going to come out of nowhere for that fish to start growing legs.

    As it is, universities websites & dictionary websites are messing with the definitions of microevolution & macroevolution where some have it separate, some are blurring the lines between the two, & some almost reads as if they are the same thing. How can anyone say they are teaching facts in this false science?

    The core of the evolution theory is macroevolution; one life becoming a different kind of life like a cow to a whale. Darwin & today "evolutionists" will note the absence of transitional fossils in the fossil records.

    Stephen Jay Goud postulated Punctuated Equilibrium or "Rapid" Macroevolution because of that huge gap of transitional fossils in the fossil records; thereby disproving Gradual macroevolution whether evolutionists admits to this or not. He went on to say that there was an explosion in the fossil record that had happened around the Cambrian period. Gould believed that a global flood had to be the cause for that explosion in the fossil record.

    Marine fossils can be found all over the world & on mountaintops even. Fossilized whale bones with other marine life fossils have been found buried together with land animal fossils on the Andes Mountains News article will report that the mountains rose suddenly from the sea to explain away the marine fossils, but not how the land animal fossils were found together buried with them on those mountaintops. Take the evolution way of looking at things out, & God may just help them to see evidence of the global flood.

    Evidence of man fumbling around in the dark with the evolution theory is why believers need to hold them to what real science is & why the evolution theory is an invalid theory because no one can observe macroevolution in the natural world; therefore what cannot be observed & thus not proven is false science.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  2. Salty

    Salty 20,000 Posts Club
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2003
    Messages:
    38,981
    Likes Received:
    2,616
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Does it take more faith to believe in Evolution or in Intelligent Design ?
     
    • Like Like x 1
  3. Hark

    Hark Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2014
    Messages:
    1,408
    Likes Received:
    63
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Since no one can see macroevolution in the natural world, it does seem to expose a certain fanaticism in the field of science.
     
  4. Scott Downey

    Scott Downey Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2019
    Messages:
    4,329
    Likes Received:
    765
    Faith:
    Non Baptist Christian
    When you don't believe what God in the scripture says, it is blasphemy, your calling God a liar.
    Many people today seem to think that questioning God, is not such a big deal.

    For example simply questioning Christ as to who He was in a challenge was blasphemy, which is satanic, that is what the devil did.

    Luke 23:39
    Then one of the criminals who were hanged blasphemed Him, saying, “If You are the Christ, save Yourself and us.”
     
  5. Hark

    Hark Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2014
    Messages:
    1,408
    Likes Received:
    63
    Faith:
    Baptist
    The devil has been msleading many since Eve by sowing doubt to His words with "Did He really say that?" or to the point "Did He really meant that?"

    With all the Bible versions, & it is being done for the love of money rather than trying to make an easier to read Bible than the KJV, in order for modern Bibles to get a copyright, it has to drop, add, & change words to be a different Bible, it is no wonder why they are not all saying the same thing & for why many are not hearing the word of God as keeping the truth, the meat of His words to discern good & evil in the King James Version.

    Amos 8:11 Behold, the days come, saith the Lord God, that I will send a famine in the land, not a famine of bread, nor a thirst for water, but of hearing the words of the Lord: 12 And they shall wander from sea to sea, and from the north even to the east, they shall run to and fro to seek the word of the Lord, and shall not find it. 13 In that day shall the fair virgins and young men faint for thirst. KJV

    That is why Pentecostals & Charismatics & Catholics & Protestants are falling ( Matthew 7:24-27 ) because they believe there is more than one way to approach God the Father in worship, prayer, & fellowship other than by the only way of the Son ( Matthew 7:13-27 & Luke 13:24-30 ) by making the Holy Spirit as Another Go To God to approach God the Father by. They doubt God really meant John 14:6 & the iniquity as stated for climbing up another way in John 10:1-5 for why many are following a stranger's voice, tongues without interpretation for private use, and not just falling to that phenomenon for not heeding the Word of God. 2 Corinthians 11:1-4 & 2 Thessalonians 2:9-15 & 2 Corinthians 13:5 which is the same thing as saying 1 John 4:2 in the testing of the spirits in 1 John 4:1-6 as they wind up with pagan's supernatural tongues ( Isaiah 8:19 ) which is gibberish nonsense & not the real God's gift of tongues per 1 Corinthians 14:20-21 to be of a foreign language to speak unto the people. Believers that hear knows Luke 13:24 is why the focus should be on the Son in honoring Him in worship if they wish to escape the judgment for not doing so in order to honor the Father the only way. John 5:22-23 & Luke 13:24-30.

    As it is, the evolution theory is a false science that sows doubts to God's words as it is written since the very first day was marked as created as the first day by that evening & morning that first day when light was created thus no day before.

    1 Timothy 6:20 O Timothy, keep that which is committed to thy trust, avoiding profane and vain babblings, and oppositions of science falsely so called: 21 Which some professing have erred concerning the faith. Grace be with thee. Amen.
     
  6. Salty

    Salty 20,000 Posts Club
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2003
    Messages:
    38,981
    Likes Received:
    2,616
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Oh boy -
    First of all- the KJV DOES have a copyright - in the UK - just not recognized in the USA.
    Thus nothing has to be changed - though the KJV is recognized to be in the Public Domain.

    And in some Bibles - (even KJ) what is copyright is the study notes!
     
  7. Hark

    Hark Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2014
    Messages:
    1,408
    Likes Received:
    63
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Understood, but its origin was certainly not done for the love of money since it was done per the request of the Puritans for a better Bible version than their Geneva because of errant marginal notes that went against the written scripture..

    One KJV Bible I am using had a footnote that the behemoth was an elephant or a hippo, but Job 40:15-24 has his tail moving like a cedar which is a tree ( Job 40:17 ) Science recently discovered that the sex organs of the dinosaurs are internal, but the Bible already testified to that in Job 40:17 also.

    I rely on the Lord Jesus Christ to guide me through the Holy Spirit in me to discern footnotes & commentaries added to the KJV Bible while relying on Him to help me understand His words as it is written & provided for me today in the KJV.

    So even now with the KJV we have, we are still to prove all things by the scripture as kept by those who loved Him & His words in the KJV. 1 Thessalonians 5:21-24

    Thank you for sharing. By His grace & by His help, I hope I clarified my posting better.
     
  8. canadyjd

    canadyjd Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2005
    Messages:
    13,409
    Likes Received:
    1,761
    Faith:
    Baptist
    You are correct about science, observation, duplication to test theories and so on.

    For evolution to be true, the change must occur at the DNA level.

    Scientists have observed changes at the DNA level hundreds if not thousands of times. In every case, such changes harm the organism. These changes give us cancers, genetic disorders (all harmful), and diseases which destroy the organism.

    In all of scientific observation, no change at the DNA level has resulted in a favorable outcome for the organism.

    peace to you
     
    • Useful Useful x 1
  9. Yeshua1

    Yeshua1 Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2012
    Messages:
    52,624
    Likes Received:
    2,742
    Faith:
    Baptist
    And yet many of those Puritans decided to stay with the Geneva Bible instead of switching to the Kjv, and doubt that Lockman main desire was to earn big profits when translated the nasb!
     
  10. Hark

    Hark Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2014
    Messages:
    1,408
    Likes Received:
    63
    Faith:
    Baptist
    And yet the world is still churning out easier to read than the KJV Bible which testifies to what? That they do not have one yet?
     
  11. Yeshua1

    Yeshua1 Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2012
    Messages:
    52,624
    Likes Received:
    2,742
    Faith:
    Baptist
    The Translators of the 1611 would have rejoiced to see all of the many good translations available today!
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  12. atpollard

    atpollard Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2018
    Messages:
    4,714
    Likes Received:
    1,174
    Faith:
    Baptist
    You mean to see how the Bible has undergone macroevolution from Greek to Latin to English and microevolution from KJV to ASV to NASB? :)
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
  13. Salty

    Salty 20,000 Posts Club
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2003
    Messages:
    38,981
    Likes Received:
    2,616
    Faith:
    Baptist
    This post is closed due to OP being temporally banned
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
Loading...