37818
Well-Known Member
There are a number of issues. Which makes this complicated.
The simple answers seem to be agreed on.
There is God.
There are three distinct Persons who are identifed to be fully and equally God.
The name of this explanation is "the Trinity."
There is the Son of God.
Some of the problems:
On the nature of God there are disagreements.
The nature of the Sonship is not agreed on by all Trinitarians.
The understanding the the two natures of the Son of God are not agreed on.
There are disagreements over issues of subordentation of Persons.
One of the problems in dealing with any of these issues are that side disagreements come into play and complicate the discussion. Accusations which are not true are made.
The same question is asked over and over even after it was answered.
There are the philosphical arguments.
There are the Biblical arguements.
The Biblical arguements, what the text says and interpertation of meanings get confused.
What I am asking in this thread to keep each post to one issue at a time.
Complex questions are more than one issue.
And an answer to one issue is not necessarily a denial of another issue.
For a starter, Son of God, God is not His Son. So in that sense the Son is not God.
John 5:18, ". . . said also that God was his Father, making himself equal with God."
So being equal with God is not the same as being God. See the problem here.
In the Trinity explanation the Son of God is God too in being equal.
So the Son here can be understood to be both not God and God too. God is not His Son.
Try to keep this simple.
The simple answers seem to be agreed on.
There is God.
There are three distinct Persons who are identifed to be fully and equally God.
The name of this explanation is "the Trinity."
There is the Son of God.
Some of the problems:
On the nature of God there are disagreements.
The nature of the Sonship is not agreed on by all Trinitarians.
The understanding the the two natures of the Son of God are not agreed on.
There are disagreements over issues of subordentation of Persons.
One of the problems in dealing with any of these issues are that side disagreements come into play and complicate the discussion. Accusations which are not true are made.
The same question is asked over and over even after it was answered.
There are the philosphical arguments.
There are the Biblical arguements.
The Biblical arguements, what the text says and interpertation of meanings get confused.
What I am asking in this thread to keep each post to one issue at a time.
Complex questions are more than one issue.
And an answer to one issue is not necessarily a denial of another issue.
For a starter, Son of God, God is not His Son. So in that sense the Son is not God.
John 5:18, ". . . said also that God was his Father, making himself equal with God."
So being equal with God is not the same as being God. See the problem here.
In the Trinity explanation the Son of God is God too in being equal.
So the Son here can be understood to be both not God and God too. God is not His Son.
Try to keep this simple.
Last edited: