1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Featured What is the difference between Cornelius and the rich young ruler?

Discussion in 'Baptist Theology & Bible Study' started by canadyjd, Jun 25, 2021.

?

If God choses someone for salvation based on their good works, What’s the difference between the two

  1. Jews and Gentiles to different standards regarding choosing for salvation

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%

  2. God requires rich people to give all their wealth to the poor.

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%

  3. God chose Cornelius for salvation according to His will and not by his good works

    9 vote(s)
    100.0%
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
Top Posters
Page 2 of 8
  1. canadyjd

    canadyjd Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2005
    Messages:
    13,314
    Likes Received:
    1,751
    Faith:
    Baptist
    I read just fine and understand quite well. Do you always have to insult someone when you make a post?

    Jesus said he lacked only “one thing”. Jesus did not say the “one thing” was related to “not fearing God or not worshipping God or not praying to God” The “one thing” lacking was related to his wealth. If you read other words in this passage that I missed, please point them out to me.

    Since something concerning his “wealth” was this “one thing” that was lacking, all the rest of his worship, prayers, reverence, alms giving… all the rest of his “good works”, and keeping the law must have been acceptable to God.

    Since your assertion that the rich young man did not fear God or worship God or pray to God cannot be substantiated by the words of the passage, it must be rejected as the “difference” between Cornelius and the rich young man.

    peace to you
     
    #21 canadyjd, Jun 26, 2021
  2. SavedByGrace

    SavedByGrace Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2020
    Messages:
    10,454
    Likes Received:
    451
    Faith:
    Baptist
    It is not insulting to say that it is very clear that there is a real difference between both accounts. But you are trying to show problems that are not there because you don't understand what both accounts mean
     
    #22 SavedByGrace, Jun 26, 2021
  3. SavedByGrace

    SavedByGrace Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2020
    Messages:
    10,454
    Likes Received:
    451
    Faith:
    Baptist
    the account of the rich ruler is before the cross, when the Law of Moses was still in force, and that of Cornelius, after, when the Law did not save anyone.
     
    #23 SavedByGrace, Jun 26, 2021
  4. canadyjd

    canadyjd Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2005
    Messages:
    13,314
    Likes Received:
    1,751
    Faith:
    Baptist
    You believe people were saved by keeping the Law? Really?

    Your first attempt to explain the difference between the rich young man and Cornelius was to assert the rich young man did not fear God, or worship God, or pray to God.

    When that answer was shown to be inconsistent with scripture, you have a new theory. The second attempt is to assert the rich young man was held to the standard of being saved by keeping the law, and Cornelius was saved by grace.

    But the rich young man had kept the law since his youth. Jesus, Himself, stated he only lacked “one thing” and that one thing related to his wealth.

    No where in the OT law are rich people required to give all of their wealth to the poor. So clearly, Jesus is not holding the rich young man to the “keep the OT Law” standard to be chosen for salvation by God.

    And you accuse me of having no understanding.

    thanks for the conversation

    peace to you
     
    #24 canadyjd, Jun 26, 2021
    Last edited: Jun 26, 2021
  5. SavedByGrace

    SavedByGrace Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2020
    Messages:
    10,454
    Likes Received:
    451
    Faith:
    Baptist
    see, I did tell you that you really don't understand! the very chapters that you quote from the Gospels says:

    "Just then a man came up to Jesus and asked, “Teacher, what good thing must I do to get eternal life?” “Why do you ask me about what is good?” Jesus replied. “There is only One who is good. If you want to enter life, keep the commandments.”

    very clear and simple!
     
    #25 SavedByGrace, Jun 26, 2021
  6. canadyjd

    canadyjd Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2005
    Messages:
    13,314
    Likes Received:
    1,751
    Faith:
    Baptist
    But the rich young had kept the Law. Very clear in the passage, Jesus said he only lacked “one thing” related to his wealth.

    Then Jesus gave him another standard for eternal life. He told him to give away all his possessions to the poor.

    That is not part of OT Law.

    You must read the entire passage in context to understand its meaning. You didn’t do that. That’s why your explanation is wrong.

    peace to you
     
    #26 canadyjd, Jun 26, 2021
  7. SavedByGrace

    SavedByGrace Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2020
    Messages:
    10,454
    Likes Received:
    451
    Faith:
    Baptist
    When Jesus says to him "keep the Commandments", is this not The OT Law? You said to me, "You believe people were saved by keeping the Law? Really?". Jesus Himself answers you and proves you WRONG!
     
    #27 SavedByGrace, Jun 26, 2021
  8. canadyjd

    canadyjd Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2005
    Messages:
    13,314
    Likes Received:
    1,751
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Paul tells us no one is saved by keeping the law, not one single person. Salvation has always been by grace, even in OT times. The OT saints had faith in God’s promises concerning the coming Messiah. The blood of Christ covers their sins as well as ours.

    When Jesus told the rich young man to keep the commandments if he wished to have eternal life, He wasn’t lying. If he could keep the commandments perfectly,, he would have had eternal life. But he couldn’t keep the law perfectly, which is why Jesus gave him a different standard than the OT Law.

    Jesus told him to give away his possessions and follow Him. That is an offer of grace. His possessions kept him from accepting this offer and following Christ.

    Jesus told the disciples how hard it is for the rich to enter into heaven. Having just watched this event they were astonished.

    The rich young man was the personification of a good Jewish man, keeping the law and earning his way into heaven by his “good works”.

    “Who then can be saved?”, they asked. In their minds, if this good man couldn’t make it to heaven, no one could.

    Jesus answered “With men, this is impossible”. The “this” is salvation. Jesus is saying it is impossible for men to earn heaven. But with God, all things are possible. Salvation is dependent upon God from start to finish.

    The answer to the OP is that no one is “chosen” for salvation based on their good works getting God’s attention, not prior to Christ nor after His resurrection.

    God choses people for salvation according to His own will and desires, not based on what we do prior to salvation.

    peace to you
     
    #28 canadyjd, Jun 26, 2021
  9. MB

    MB Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2006
    Messages:
    6,890
    Likes Received:
    262
    Faith:
    Baptist
    If I told you that I had kept all of the commandments from child hood would you believe me?
    Should we think Christ didn't know this was not true?

    How could we be saved while still in our sins if we did? Since we are saved while still in our sins the sin is not what's important at this moment. What is? isn't it our trust and Love of Him. Was the rich man distraught over his sins. Nope. He lied and said he hadn't sined. There is no man with out sin.
    Christ knows all. He knows what your condition is before you tell Him. Proof that he loved his money is in the fact that he just walked away disappointed. IOW he loved his money and did not plan on giving up that money.Some think wasn't wrong enough for him to be denied. I hope they look at Annaias and Sappihira. They fell down dead because they loved money and kept some back lying to God just as the rich man did. Acts 5:1-5.

    To show the man him self in that he couldn't do it because he loved the money more.
    Cornelius Gave from the heart but the rich man could not do that because of his love for it.
    MB
     
    #29 MB, Jun 26, 2021
  10. MB

    MB Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2006
    Messages:
    6,890
    Likes Received:
    262
    Faith:
    Baptist
    We do not know that he kept the Law. Christ knows better. "There is no man with out sin".
     
    #30 MB, Jun 26, 2021
  11. MB

    MB Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2006
    Messages:
    6,890
    Likes Received:
    262
    Faith:
    Baptist
    The Lord Jesus expects us to love Him above all else. If we can't do this we are not saved.
    MB
     
    #31 MB, Jun 26, 2021
  12. 1689Dave

    1689Dave Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2018
    Messages:
    7,953
    Likes Received:
    707
    Faith:
    Baptist
    God chose Corneilus as a wretched sinner and gave him a new heart that performed good works by nature. Later Peter preached to him and his friends showing the gospel lifestyle. But he was already saved.

    The rich young ruler could not measure up to the law he trusted to save him. Jesus only proved how futile it was to him. The saved trust in Jesus as their righteousness and good works follow.
     
    #32 1689Dave, Jun 26, 2021
  13. MB

    MB Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2006
    Messages:
    6,890
    Likes Received:
    262
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Wrong Cornelius was not saved until he heard the gospel. You cannot be saved without knowing Jesus.
    MB
     
    #33 MB, Jun 26, 2021
  14. 1689Dave

    1689Dave Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2018
    Messages:
    7,953
    Likes Received:
    707
    Faith:
    Baptist
    “Then Peter opened his mouth, and said, Of a truth I perceive that God is no respecter of persons: But in every nation he that feareth him, and worketh righteousness, is accepted with him.” Acts 10:34–35 (KJV 1900)

    This agrees with the new birth (salvation) before faith can exist. If not born again, the gospel is foolishness.
     
    #34 1689Dave, Jun 26, 2021
  15. AustinC

    AustinC Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 29, 2020
    Messages:
    10,911
    Likes Received:
    1,458
    Faith:
    Baptist
    How is it that Baptists are promoting Roman Catholic theology of justification by faith plus works endorsed via the Council of Trent which went directly against the Reformation? Yet, here we have people in this thread openly promoting salvation by works of the law. It's a mystery. Did Baptists secretly renounce the Reformation and return to Rome?
     
    #35 AustinC, Jun 26, 2021
    • Informative Informative x 1
  16. canadyjd

    canadyjd Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2005
    Messages:
    13,314
    Likes Received:
    1,751
    Faith:
    Baptist
    The rich young man claimed he kept the law since his youth. Jesus did not contradict that claim. Jesus told him he lacked only “one thing” which had something to do with his wealth, not with keeping the law.

    The man didn’t claim he was sinless. The OT Law allowed for sacrifices for sin.

    Jesus gave him instructions for eternal life that went beyond the OT Law. He was told to give all his possessions to the poor and follow Jesus.

    If “good works” were necessary for God to chose someone for salvation, the rich young man would have been chosen for salvation.

    peace to you
     
    #36 canadyjd, Jun 26, 2021
  17. SavedByGrace

    SavedByGrace Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2020
    Messages:
    10,454
    Likes Received:
    451
    Faith:
    Baptist
    then you believe in a WORKS SALVATION!
     
    #37 SavedByGrace, Jun 26, 2021
  18. SavedByGrace

    SavedByGrace Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2020
    Messages:
    10,454
    Likes Received:
    451
    Faith:
    Baptist
    what about Abraham and Rahab in James chapter 2?
     
    #38 SavedByGrace, Jun 26, 2021
  19. kyredneck

    kyredneck Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2009
    Messages:
    20,157
    Likes Received:
    2,988
    Faith:
    Baptist
    ??? Can you not read or understand? Are you dense? The young man ran to Christ, kneeled before Him, and saluted Him with language intended for the divine. Christ loved him, and did not dispute his claim of doing no ill towards his neighbor. The evidence points to this young man being circumcised in heart. Where he messed up is when he asked, "What lack I yet"? And Christ says, 'if you would be perfect sell all and follow me'. Christ actually put it forth to him to become His disciple, and he balked. I agree with Edersheim on this, 'saved' here is not in reference to the eternal salvation of the soul but of entering into the benefits of the kingdom, i.e., Christendom.

    This is just a photo snap shot of this young man at this moment in time, just as with Nicodemus in Jn 3. Who knows that he did not indeed later on join with the saints in Jerusalem who sold all and held everything in common.

    I choose not to judge him harshly.

    "Concerning the rich young ruler of whom it is said Christ "loved him" (Mark 10:21), we fully believe that he was one of God's elect and was "saved" sometime after his interview with our Lord. . . . It is written, "Him that cometh to me I will in no wise cast out," and this man certainly did "come" to Him." A.W. Pink, The Sovereignty of God
     
    #39 kyredneck, Jun 27, 2021
    • Like Like x 1
  20. canadyjd

    canadyjd Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2005
    Messages:
    13,314
    Likes Received:
    1,751
    Faith:
    Baptist
    I certainly do not discount the possibility the rich young man eventually become a follower of Christ. I hope to see him in heaven. We have to admit that is speculation, however.

    The focus of the OP concerns the assertions by some that the “good works” of Cornelius were the reason God chose him for salvation.

    My question is, if this were true of Cornelius, why not the rich young man?

    peace to you
     
    #40 canadyjd, Jun 27, 2021
Page 2 of 8
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
Loading...