Reformed1689
Well-Known Member
No I put a stop because that is how it is written.You put a stop because your theology cannot accept that Jesus died for the entire human race desires that all are saved
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
No I put a stop because that is how it is written.You put a stop because your theology cannot accept that Jesus died for the entire human race desires that all are saved
No I put a stop because that is how it is written.
I did not say anything about punctuation, you did. Verse 17 shows that verse 16 is not talking about individuals. Why? Verse 17 says that the world would be saved through him, yet we know not every individual is saved. So this notion that World in verse 16 is talking about individuals is utter nonsense.did you know, that in the Original Books, and earliest manuscripts, there are not punctuation, chapters and verses? So your argument is really moot!
Some use of punctuation does exist. For example, some of the. early mss which omit John 7:53 through John 8:11 have a punctuation mark in it's place.. . . there are not punctuation . . . .
I did not say anything about punctuation, you did. Verse 17 shows that verse 16 is not talking about individuals. Why? Verse 17 says that the world would be saved through him, yet we know not every individual is saved. So this notion that World in verse 16 is talking about individuals is utter nonsense.
I have said that it is the entire human race. But I also said that it is a different part of the verse than who Jesus came for. Verse 17 shows world is not dealing with INDIVIDUALS.Verse 16 says the WORLD, which is either, the entire human race, or only the elect, as you probably believe. In verse 17 it says, "For God did not send His Son into the world to condemn the world, but so that the world might be saved through Him". where the first use of WORLD is the our planet. the second use is the same as in verse 16.
I have said that it is the entire human race. But I also said that it is a different part of the verse than who Jesus came for. Verse 17 shows world is not dealing with INDIVIDUALS.
P66 has a mark after 7:52. Vaticanus and Sinaiticus too.the only thing that we can see in the earliest Greek papyri, are "." in places. As in P66 of John 1
View attachment 5763
The COLLECTIVE human race. Not individuals. No God does not love everyone the same. He has a GENERAL love and gives GENERAL grace to all, but does not love all the way He loves the elect. And no, that's not me saying that, that is Scripture saying that. If God loved ALL and wanted ALL to be saved, he would give them ALL to the son. But he does not.lets get this right. you are saying that God SO LOVES the entire human race, but then sends Jesus Christ only for the elect? So, what exactly is this GREAT LOVE that God shows to the human race, that they end up in hell, with zero option to get saved? The context is clearly salvation
The COLLECTIVE human race. Not individuals. No God does not love everyone the same. He has a GENERAL love and gives GENERAL grace to all, but does not love all the way He loves the elect. And no, that's not me saying that, that is Scripture saying that. If God loved ALL and wanted ALL to be saved, he would give them ALL to the son. But he does not.
BTW @SavedByGrace it was @Reformed1689 who originally brought Luke 22:20-21 to my attention, first making the argument that the plural "you" did not include Judas. I had already knew Judas was at the table. But in my original study the use of that plural you was not at issue.
Because we do not add to scripture as you try to as you pervert the truth.I have addressed this passage dozens of times, but the Calvinists seem unwilling to accept the passage does not say "no one ever seeks after God..."
Because we do not add to scripture as you try to as you pervert the truth.






It is not a "Calvinist" thing ... there is a GOOD REASON why people do not accept ANYONE's explanation that "There is none who seeks after God." does not mean "no one ever seeks after God...". If scripture means the opposite of what it says, then God has handed us a worthless book of unknowable "truth" and we have a bigger problem than "monergism vs free will". We have a God that is against us knowing and understanding Him.I have addressed this passage dozens of times, but the Calvinists seem unwilling to accept the passage does not say "no one ever seeks after God..."
Acts of the Apostles 13:48so you were SAVED before you REPENTED and BELIEVED?
That, my friend, is exactly what it is to be one of Christ's sheep, given to Him by the Father.This, my friend, is IMPOSSIBLE!
Mark 1:15, Spoken to the Jews who were and are responsible, given their history, to repent and believe the Gospel.He is very clear in Mark 1:15; Luke 13:1-5; 24:47 (ESV, NASB, NIV, AB, CSB, NET, etc); and Peter Acts 2:37-38, etc. I think NOT!
That God only saves those who were chosen in Christ before the foundation of the world.One Question?
What has God made known to those you put in blue and does, what was made known, have anything to do with the OP?
Here a Calvinist claims their doctrine is not "no one ever seeks God." Go figureBecause we do not add to scripture as you try to as you pervert the truth.