Poll: If the 2nd A was constitutionally repealed…….

Is the mark of the beast going to be a law of the government? According to scripture, should one take the mark of the beast or not take the mark of the beast?

During the time spoken of in Rev. is the mark of the beast pre or post the kingdom of this world are become the kingdom of the Lord and of His Christ?

What about Romans 13? Apply or not to the mark of the beast?

 

I must respectfully disagree. According to David Barton and other historians, the majority of our founding fathers were devout followers of Christ Jesus. Do you believe they made the wrong decision in their rebellion against the British Empire?

 

I like drones and today they are cheap and effective. Also, explosives can be made from household items purchased at any Walmart.

 

Scripture points out they were not obeying God when they revolted. Many colonists also disagreed with them. The Revolutionary War was actually the First Civil War of neighbor against neighbor.
It was the tactics of the Rebels that has been used in many other places in the world, including the Vietnam communist rebels who revolted against France and later the US.

The difference between the US rebels and the Vietnamese rebels is that the US rebels claimed God as their excuse while the Vietnamese claimed themselves as their excuse.

Look at Thomas Jefferson and Thomas Paine for the influence that spurred rebellion.

 

Let me rephrase: It was the first civil war on US soil.

 

You may want to reread the Constitution and see the process for creating an amendment and then explain to me how that is not a “government” process?

You are substituting YOUR morals for Gods. “Evil” is what YOU say is evil and “good” is what you say is good.

Where does God prohibit killing a baby and where does God prohibit owning a weapon? Let GOD be the yardstick for judging good and evil, not your hatred of guns.

 

Is God FOR or AGAINST “oppressive” governments?
Would a government stripping its citizens of such protection be a “good” or “evil” action?

(Your hypothetical case is founded on a false assumption that stripping the protection of the Second Amendment is a “good” thing and Christians should obey “good laws” … like making the citizens defenseless against tyranny … and oppose “evil laws” … like killing unborn ‘babies’). Since TYRANNY is evil, defending against tyranny is good and promoting defenselessness is evil.

So killing babies and killing those that oppose tyranny do hold some parallels. Defending babies and defending against tyranny also hold some parallels.

Hitler never attacked the United States, but it was right for the US to oppose the Third Reich’s conquest of Europe.

 

How does the Christian defend when His King is the Commander of the Lord's Army? Is not our best defense the Word of God and Prayer?

My opinion: We have been fighting this war with the world's weapons (legal battles and politics) when we should be using the weapons God has given us.

Ephesians 6:10-20

Finally, be strong in the Lord and in the strength of his might. Put on the whole armor of God, that you may be able to stand against the schemes of the devil. For we do not wrestle against flesh and blood, but against the rulers, against the authorities, against the cosmic powers over this present darkness, against the spiritual forces of evil in the heavenly places. Therefore take up the whole armor of God, that you may be able to withstand in the evil day, and having done all, to stand firm. Stand therefore, having fastened on the belt of truth, and having put on the breastplate of righteousness, and, as shoes for your feet, having put on the readiness given by the gospel of peace. In all circumstances take up the shield of faith, with which you can extinguish all the flaming darts of the evil one; and take the helmet of salvation, and the sword of the Spirit, which is the word of God, praying at all times in the Spirit, with all prayer and supplication. To that end keep alert with all perseverance, making supplication for all the saints, and also for me, that words may be given to me in opening my mouth boldly to proclaim the mystery of the gospel, for which I am an ambassador in chains, that I may declare it boldly, as I ought to speak.

 

Can the Second Amendment Be Repealed? How? - FindLaw

Leftist late night hosts are now in on disarming Americans. Colbert's rerun show this evening, a rebroadcast of some Thursday edition, has him saying it's long overdue for our government to do something about guns!

Actor Matthew McConaughey was a puppet of the White House recently. He's from Uvalde Texas, and talked about stricter gun laws, etc...
The Uvalde shooter purchased his weapons legally. Matt didn't seem to know that.

These shootings are far more in succession immediately after Uvalde than any I can recall happening just after an out of the blue (latest) massacre.

It's a pattern. One day after no reports of a mass shooting for months, one occurs.
Shortly after there's another, then another.

Children are always included among the dead in the first massacre.

Because innocent kids being shot outrages everyone.

And these massacres always spark gun rights debates. And of course D.C goes on the record on the Hill.

After Uvalde though it's way more follow-up killings than before.
And you know there's something up unlike before when media adds a killing in historic Philadelphia to that tally.
When there are killings happening there every single day, bar none.

I think there's going to come a day in a relatively short time from now when another massacre will occur so profound as to cause rumblings of Martial law being invoked.

It'll happen in one location, that city,town/state, where the massacre occurred.
It'll be spun as understandable given the death toll.
It'll happen. And will last for awhile there.
Then another massacre will happen. Possibly on the opposite coast from where the order for ML was invoked.

The ML model will be touted as effective. Because there were no shootings after ML was declared "there".

And that's when , after that second large scale mass murder event occurs, ML will be promoted as ideal for the whole country.
Because mass murder is an epidemic.

There's a years old anti-gun poster on the net that talks about Britain's seizure of firearms,even antiques, years ago.
The seizure was prompted by a school massacre.

It says, ever since the gun ban there has never been another school shooting.

Now in GB knives are the number one offensive weapon.
Oh, but at least it's not a gun.
Even their police are unarmed!
If firearms are deemed necessary at a scene, responding police have to call a special branch that's permitted to carry firearms to respond.
Of course this costs valuable time waiting for their arrival. And lives potentially too.

What does an unarmed citizen population do when their government is armed to the teeth?

Anything their told to do.

 

Can God prohibit killing a baby when God killed babies?

 

So God, whom we're to obey as a role model for righteous living on our part, "Christlike"=Christian, can kill babies and children because he's God. But we can't legalize abortion because killing babies is contrary to the spirit of righteousness, that is God?

When Jesus,who was God, The Word made flesh, told his Disciples, “truly, I say to you, unless you turn and become like children, you will never enter the kingdom of heaven"?