Featured Is God The Father Fons Deitatis?

2 Persons?

 

Before his birth, the Second person of the trinity was the Logos, who became when incarnated the Son!

 

All 3 of them have eternally existed as Yahweh

 

God the Father and the Son of God are two distinct Persons, are they not?

 

he was Yahweh, but was not the father, was His eternal word, the Logos!

 

Yes, both equally God

 

So, God changed?

 

No, as the second person of the trinity stayed God fully, but now also a full human!

 

Not as Yahweh. As Adonai.

YHWH or Yahweh is God. God, the Holy Spirit, and the son/Word as one is called Adonai/Lord. Adonai is from eternity. God, the Holy Spirit, and Jesus are beings manifested separately in creation. As one they are called Adonai/Lord.

Somehow, since the first century, the church has used God as the "catch all" term.

 

Father, jesus, and Holy Spirit are all eternally God!

 

God, the Word, and Holy Spirit are all Adonai, LORD.

That did not change at a certain dispensation. People just started using human terms, ie Father and Son.

 

I cannot edit this quote:

I will attempt to clear up my error. The term YWHW is Lord. My point should have been YWHW is not God. Elohim is the term for God in the OT.

I should have said Elohim is God. YWHW is the Lord/Adonai. God, the Word, and the Holy Spirit are the manifested Trinity in creation. God is still the catch all term, which is the wrong approach from a Scriptural standpoint. God is not the originator or fountain of the Son. The use of father and son replaces the term God and the Word in linguistics. All 3 were involved in the process of Jesus' birth, but supernaturally, not scientifically. As science cannot explain the nature of God becoming man 100%. Certainly Jesus as a man was 100% biological from Adam's genetic perspective, but Jesus did not take on Adam's dead corruptible flesh. That is also besides the point Jesus did not have a sin nature, which is not genetic.

So, no God was not the fountain. Adonai/Lord/YWHW allowed the physical manifestation of Jesus on earth is what I was trying to point out but failed to do so.

I apologize for the confusion.

 

The term יהוה is the proper name of God. Exodus 3:

[13] Then Moses said to God, “If I come to the people of Israel and say to them, ‘The God of your fathers has sent me to you,’ and they ask me, ‘What is his name?’ what shall I say to them?” [14] God said to Moses, “I AM WHO I AM.” And he said, “Say this to the people of Israel: ‘I AM has sent me to you.’” [15] God also said to Moses, “Say this to the people of Israel: ‘The LORD, the God of your fathers, the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob, has sent me to you.’ This is my name forever, and thus I am to be remembered throughout all generations. (Exodus 3:13–15 ESV, emphasis mine)​

"I AM" is the divine name, יהוה. It is built on the 3rd-person singular form of the Hebrew verb "to be." He (God!) Himself claims it as His own name.

If Jesus was not in "Adam's flesh" then how could He die? Why was there a transfiguration? By your errant thinking, Jesus should have appeared as "transfigured" all the time, not just at the transfiguration.

Lots of problems here... theological and logical.

The Archangel

 

No, the Persons were revealed as Father, Son and Holy Ghost.

 

So you do not accept they were 3 persons in Genesis 1? When God walked with Adam in the Garden was that the Word?

There literally is no time affect on the 3 persons in the Trinity, yet from our standpoint there was a specific time the Word was made flesh. So the Son would be the Son throughout all of time. Time would not limit the Lord God in any way.

 

You have an inept view of God and the Persons who are that God.

 

Then the majority view is just human understanding along with opinion, and some form of opinionated education, and certainly not God's Word.

Inept must mean free of human theology mixed together with years of philosophy.

Why do humans have such a narrow restricted view of God?