Silverhair
Well-Known Member
You just now figured that out? To say we have different views of Soteriology is an understatement.
Well I did not want to say your whole system of theology is failed.
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
You just now figured that out? To say we have different views of Soteriology is an understatement.
When i quote 1Ti_2:6 who gave Himself a ransom for all
Whereas a physically dead body will stay dead a spiritually dead body does not have to.
Well I did not want to say your whole system of theology is failed.
John 8:43 Why do ye not understand my speech? even because ye cannot hear my word. (emphasis mine)
Under your theology man has an excuse
It is not that the could not it was that they would not.
"and this ransom was given for "all"; not for every individual of mankind, for then all would be delivered, freed, and saved, whereas they are not; or else the ransom price is paid in vain, or God is unjust to receive a sufficient ransom price from Christ, and yet not free the captive, but punish the person for whom he has received satisfaction; neither of which can be said.
- from John Gill's Bible commentary on 1 Timothy 2:6
Neither does a physical body have to stay dead. Ever heard of Lazarus and others who were raised from the dead? Also, have you forgotten that Christ physically came back from the dead?
Believe me, Silverhair, I regard our soteriological differences to be serious, very, very, very, very serious.
They had every opportunity to exercise their supposed "free will", but as we know the Bible teaches, their free will is incapable of saving them or anyone else who is depending upon their "free will" for salvation. Sir, they have no excuse. As the apostle Paul wrote about folks like you:
Romans 9:20-21 Nay but, O man, who art thou that repliest against God? Shall the thing formed say to him that formed it, Why hast thou made me thus? Hath not the potter power over the clay, of the same lump to make one vessel unto honour, and another unto dishonour?
Like I stated, it went over your head, oh wellActually you just said a self defeating argument and the refused to listen to reason. But you keep making that embarrassing argument.
You continue to show you cant understand a simple analogy. Man is spiritually dead like a person is physically dead !You continue to speak out of both sides of your mouth.
What did you say? "Just why do you think that God used the term "dead" if he didn't mean dead as human beings understand the word from their time on this earth?"
So if the person is dead as human beings understand the word from their time on this earth then you can not say they sin can you. And you are saying it is an analogy of dead spiritually, in other words, can not trust in God, your argument fails.
Why you ask? Because, and this is point you keep trying to avoid, if they were spiritually dead there is nothing in the bible that says they can not turn to Christ but there are a number of verse that say they can and it is even expected.
You need to be regenerated, made alive before you can believe on Christ, thats why Jesus said, no man has the ability to come [believe] on Him, except the Father draws him, which is regenerate him.You need to read your bible. You are regenerated/ saved/ born again after you hear and believe the gospel. You are teaching a false gospel.
Like I said, you can quote a scripture all you want, but it doesnt mean you believe it aright, or understand it.When i quote 1Ti_2:6 who gave Himself a ransom for all, You Calvinists say no He was only a ransom for the elect. And you say I don't believe the bible, really!
Your whole theology seems to be built on miss using the scriptures. And teaching contrary to the clear text.
Six hour warning -
the thread will be closed no sooner than 830 am EDT / 530 am PDT