Featured Are forms other than Calvinism & Arminanism debate form to be C & A debate?

I thought you already had the rules in place. I saw several years ago an admin post something to the effect of "Calvinism nor Arminianism can be mentioned outside the C vs A forum." I can't swear to it, but I am quite sure it was Cassidy.

 

You're probably right in your recollection. The fact is when discussing/debating doctrine it can often (and I do mean often) unintentionally morph into C vs A. There was a time when the mods would move a thread (usually upon request) to the C vs A Forum when the thread subject changed, which is extra work for them. So, I'm for letting the mods determine how they wish to handle it.

 

'Monergism vs Synergism' would be more correct (and inclusive, or less exclusive), I think.

 

There are a lot of cults in the camp...

 

...bigots and religionists too.

 

Indeed. Especially within preterism.

 

C vs A gives an illusion that, "A"*,
could possibly be valid,
or God Forbid, "as valid",
as The Doctrines of Grace,

which are a small portion
of the Manifold Wisdom
and Whole Counsel of God,

THE FAITH once delivered to the saints/
at I hold to these points of Calvinism (by the number of)

*"A" denies the Adamic sin Imputed to all of Adam's posterity leaves them Totally Depraved,
when Salvation involves being Convicted of being Totally Depraved, to start with.

I didn't say they were lost.

I say that a person should know
or be able to be Taught How they Were Saved,
(from Totally Depravity) if they are Saved.

 

Yep.

 

Romans 3:20; "Therefore by the deeds of the law there shall no flesh be justified in his sight: for by the law is the knowledge of sin."

 

That's called the "Other Christian Denominations" thread.
The basic difference is synergism vs monergism.