Silverhair
Well-Known Member
I think it is ambiguous. And yes, it does include free choices (not autonomous) of humans for life or death. That is the way Calvinists preach. In the end, and looking back, was it in some way predetermined? If you really think about it yes, you can get to that point logically. But if you do arrive at that point logically - That does not mean that you are no longer under the clear commands that you read in scripture.
So while it is indeed ambiguous you cannot pick and choose various Calvinistic statements as the only representation of what Calvinism is. It is a fact that high Calvinists like Owen said repeatedly that you have it on the direct promise of God that if you come to him He will save you. No one has any right to say that Calvinists don't believe that. You do have a right to say that it doesn't fit with some of the theological writings or that it doesn't fit the TULIP but it is too much on record how they preached and taught to charge them with declaring that there are some who aren't allowed to come to Christ because they were predestined to be damned.
What you overlook Dave is that what they preach is not what they in fact believe. They can not hold to the TULIP or their divine determinism view and be honest when they preach that all can come to Christ Jesus for salvation.
Why does salvation of certain individuals have to be predetermined? It does not say that in the bible so that is only something that your theology reads into scripture.
You wrote that humans have the free choice of life or death but that is not what Calvinism preaches is it? The only free will, according to Calvinism, that man has is to sin. So no free will for life. Remember your DoG or TULIP is very exclusive as to who will be saved. So once again no real free will so as to be able to choose life.
I agree that Calvinist will preach that if you come to God in faith you will be saved but the problem is that they then bar the vast majority of humanity from even the possibility of salvation by their DoG. Yet they maintain that man is responsible for rejecting God.