Featured The objective truth of God's word.

Then if he did not promote the comma he should have said so rather than defend it as he has. From 37 "Are you blind? Count the claimed witnesses. 3 and 3 a total of 5, one being counted twice. Or do you believe there are two different Spirits?" sure looks like he is defending the comma.

And here you go thinking that you know what and when I knew something. Rather presumptuous of you don't you think.

 

So if @Conan is correct and you do not think the comma should be in the bible and you keep claiming the bible is inerrant then I have to ask why do you use the KJV that has the comma included? But since I do not like other people to speak for me I will ask you directly, do you think the comma should be in the bible. Yes or No.

 

See post 137# and 140#.

 

See the rest of the thread, he had lots of chances to say he did not support the comma but all he did was dance around an answer. Could that be because it would put his inerrant bible theory in jeopardy. Look how long it took you to be clear with your answers.

It really helps move a discussion along when people give clear responses or ask clear questions.