1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Vetoes

Discussion in 'Political Debate & Discussion' started by Salty, Sep 4, 2023.

?
  1. Yes

    3 vote(s)
    42.9%
  2. NO

    4 vote(s)
    57.1%
  3. Other answer

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  1. KenH

    KenH Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2002
    Messages:
    43,035
    Likes Received:
    1,639
    Faith:
    Baptist
    I change my answer to undecided. If Arkansas ever decides to try to adopt it, then I will look into it more.
     
  2. KenH

    KenH Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2002
    Messages:
    43,035
    Likes Received:
    1,639
    Faith:
    Baptist
    • Informative Informative x 1
  3. KenH

    KenH Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2002
    Messages:
    43,035
    Likes Received:
    1,639
    Faith:
    Baptist
    There isn't supposed to be. The Congress is to legislate, including spending money and passing laws. One of the main problems in the MASSIVE increase in the size, reach, and scope of the federal government(besides the Congress MASSIVELY spending more money than there are revenues to support it) is the MASSIVE use of executive orders by the executive branch, which Congress goes along with so that they don't have to be responsible - if an action by the executive branch works out, then they can jump on the bandwagon, if it doesn't work out, then they can criticize it.
     
  4. Salty

    Salty 20,000 Posts Club
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2003
    Messages:
    38,981
    Likes Received:
    2,616
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Wow - off by 79 billion

    Lets see how long does it take the US govt to spen 79 billion!?? :Biggrin:Laugh:Roflmao
    What a few hours, maybe a couple of days
     
  5. KenH

    KenH Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2002
    Messages:
    43,035
    Likes Received:
    1,639
    Faith:
    Baptist
    It is reasonable to expect that within the month of September, maybe even this week, that the United States of America will "celebrate" :Frown reaching $33 trillion in national debt.
     
  6. canadyjd

    canadyjd Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2005
    Messages:
    13,408
    Likes Received:
    1,760
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Personally, I believe the only way to stop the out of control spending is a constitutional amendment that declares the Federal Government……

    1. May only tax individuals up to 10%, corporations up to 15%. It can be less but not more unless approved by 2/3 cote in house and senate and then for only 1 year.

    2. Prohibit the practice of “baseline budgeting” (which means the last passed bill is the baseline and nothing can be cut from it.)

    3. The federal government must produce a balanced budget every year unless waived by 2/3 vote both houses and then for only 1 year.

    4. The Federal Reserve is abolished. All monetary policy is controlled by the Treasury Department i.e. the Executive Branch

    peace to you
     
  7. Salty

    Salty 20,000 Posts Club
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2003
    Messages:
    38,981
    Likes Received:
    2,616
    Faith:
    Baptist
    What need to happen is top a lot of unnecessary (and unconstitutional ) spending
     
  8. KenH

    KenH Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2002
    Messages:
    43,035
    Likes Received:
    1,639
    Faith:
    Baptist
    When the Federal Reserve was created in 1913, the national debt was around $3 billion.

    So, during the journey from a gold standard monetary system to a fiat monetary system, the national debt has gone from $3 billion to $33 trillion; and the value of a dollar bill in 1913 is now $.03 (Cost of Living Calculator: What is Your Dollar Worth Today?)

    So, all in all, it is quite clear that the Federal Reserve has been a total failure - it has destroyed the value of the U.S. dollar and accommodated the MASSIVE profligacy of the federal government.
     
  9. Piper

    Piper Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2013
    Messages:
    905
    Likes Received:
    148
    Faith:
    Baptist
    There is, as the Executive, he is to be one of the checks and balances that stops legislatures from over-reach.
     
    • Winner Winner x 1
  10. Piper

    Piper Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2013
    Messages:
    905
    Likes Received:
    148
    Faith:
    Baptist
    If Only!!!!!!
     
  11. KenH

    KenH Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2002
    Messages:
    43,035
    Likes Received:
    1,639
    Faith:
    Baptist
    I agree. However, the president already has the veto power. He doesn't need the line item veto to carry out his constitutional duties(not that the presidents after Grover Cleveland have cared all that much about the federal government adhering to its constitutional powers).
     
  12. Salty

    Salty 20,000 Posts Club
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2003
    Messages:
    38,981
    Likes Received:
    2,616
    Faith:
    Baptist
    What part of AM/FM radio do you not understand???
     
  13. KenH

    KenH Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2002
    Messages:
    43,035
    Likes Received:
    1,639
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Hmmm...AM/FM - seems like I have heard of that before - long, long ago. While I'm thinking about it, I'll listen to my SiriusXM app on my iPhone. :Thumbsdown
     
  14. OnlyaSinner

    OnlyaSinner Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2013
    Messages:
    1,102
    Likes Received:
    177
    Faith:
    Baptist
    That would not be my concern. Rather, it would be a scenario where one major party nominee is liberal and the other party's nominee is conservative, and a conservative 3rd-party candidate takes enough votes to swing the win to the liberal candidate.

    And without watching the video that Salty posted, the idea smells a bit like Maine's ranked-choice voting, and because the state's voting machinery is not all computer-driven, the "instant" runoff is anything but. Installing that system for nation-wide elections would require some heavy-duty software development with ultra-powerful security. Not impossible but the current track record for related software development does not give me optimism.
    Personally, I don't use the ranked choice, voting only for my 1st choice. The probability is very low but not zero that my 2nd or 3rd choice could result in defeating my 1st choice.
     
  15. Salty

    Salty 20,000 Posts Club
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2003
    Messages:
    38,981
    Likes Received:
    2,616
    Faith:
    Baptist
    If ranked choice voting was available - then possibly more people would run for office.
    And if it did happen to go nation-wide - the system would still be the responsibility of the State/commonwealth.

    Also you mentioned if 2 conservatives were to run against one liberal -
    However - supposed it is one liberal, one conservative and a libertarian!
    Or to add to the mix - an extremist left winger and an extremist right winger - for a total of 5 candidates.......
     
  16. KenH

    KenH Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2002
    Messages:
    43,035
    Likes Received:
    1,639
    Faith:
    Baptist
    In that case, then, I would suggest that candidates do what they did before the 21st century, try to persuade as many voters as possible to vote for them, instead of just trying to gin up the voters in their narrow base of support.
     
    • Useful Useful x 1
  17. OnlyaSinner

    OnlyaSinner Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2013
    Messages:
    1,102
    Likes Received:
    177
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Agreed, and though the negative campaign ads have reached new lows this century, there were plenty in the 19th and 20th. One example in memory was Nixon-Humphrey in 1968. Late in the campaign the Humphrey folks ran an ad showing Nixon's face followed by pictures of nuclear mushroom clouds. In 1964 some folks were saying if one voted (I was too young) for Goldwater we would be in a war within 6 months. A few weeks after the Tonkin Gulf incident, my dad said, "I did, and we are!"
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  18. Salty

    Salty 20,000 Posts Club
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2003
    Messages:
    38,981
    Likes Received:
    2,616
    Faith:
    Baptist
    (bold my emphasis)

    And why do politicians use negative campaigns ads - BECAUSE they are effective!!

    And during the Goldwater campaign- the Dems showed a Social Security being cut off.
    and virtually every campaign since the D's try to say the R's want to end SS!

    Click for you-tube
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  19. KenH

    KenH Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2002
    Messages:
    43,035
    Likes Received:
    1,639
    Faith:
    Baptist
    If I were to be made king, I would immediately ban candidates being on the ballot with a party designation. I think candidates should have to stand on their own two hind legs instead of using a party label to get people to vote for them.
     
  20. Salty

    Salty 20,000 Posts Club
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2003
    Messages:
    38,981
    Likes Received:
    2,616
    Faith:
    Baptist
    I praise the Lord that you are not King!

    Would you also ban churches with a denomination label, as you believe that every local church should stand on their own two hind legs instead of using a denomination to get people to come to their church?
     
    • Like Like x 1
Loading...