Per KJVO, Did we even have real word of God to us as a Bible before 1611?

[Logos1560]

Stop attacking word of God, all others are satanic。

It is your human KJV-only reasoning that attacks or condemns the applying of the same exact scriptural measures/standards consistently and justly.
Disagreeing with your human, non-true, and non-scriptural KJV-only opinions is not attacking the word of God as you falsely allege.

In disobedience to a clear command of God, you bear false witness with your non-true accusations against the word of God translated into present-day standard English.

 

[David Lamb]

It is your human KJV-only reasoning that attacks or condemns the applying of the same exact scriptural measures/standards consistently and justly.
Disagreeing with your human, non-true, and non-scriptural KJV-only opinions is not attacking the word of God as you falsely allege.

In disobedience to a clear command of God, you bear false witness with your non-true accusations against the word of God translated into present-day standard English.

I agree. And where does all other versions being satanic leave Christians who don't speak English? Are translations of the bible into Icelandic, Mongolian, Norwegian, or whatever all satanic?

 

[Saved421]

I agree. And where does all other versions being satanic leave Christians who don't speak English? Are translations of the bible into Icelandic, Mongolian, Norwegian, or whatever all satanic?

No, if they are based on the KJB.

 

[Logos1560]

all others are satanic。

Are you claiming that the 1582 Roman Catholic Rheims New Testament from which the Church of England makers of the KJV borrowed many renderings is Satanic?

 

[Scarlett O.]

The KJB is the word of God, not prefaces, images, headings and not scholars.

Stop attacking word of God, all others are satanic。

If you call any good Bibles "satanic" once more, I am banning you.

 

[David Lamb]

No, if they are based on the KJB.

Why ever should Mongolian Christians (for example) have to rely on a bible translated from Hebrew and Greek into 17th century English, then translated from 17th century English into Mongolian? Why do you think English speakers should be the only people to have a bible translated from the original Greek and Hebrew?

 

[JesusFan]

The KJB is the word of God, not prefaces, images, headings and not scholars.

Stop attacking word of God, all others are satanic。

So we had unicorns as Kjv stated, and they were observing Easter in NT Times?

 

[JesusFan]

Why ever should Mongolian Christians (for example) have to rely on a bible translated from Hebrew and Greek into 17th century English, then translated from 17th century English into Mongolian? Why do you think English speakers should be the only people to have a bible translated from the original Greek and Hebrew?

And this is why the LORD did not have any of the originals preserved to us thru history, as we have had a shrine build to enclose them, and many would go up to worship them , to make the their version of being KJVO

 

[JesusFan]

Anyone claiming any translation contains one or more errors, please provide the source you are using to expose the error(s).

No translation can claim divine inspiration, so by very definition are not perfect

 

[JesusFan]

The KJB is the word of God, not prefaces, images, headings and not scholars.

Stop attacking word of God, all others are satanic。

The Vulgate, Geneva, Bishop Tynsdale etc diagree, as do now the Nkjv/Esv/Nasb etc