DaveXR650
Well-Known Member
That is what the Catholics say.If you're saying that James is teaching faith + works = salvation, you are mistaken.
Paul states beyond a shadow of doubt salvation is without works.
James in defining the quality of faith needed for salvation, the kind of faith that " Believes from the heart, and works will accompany it.
From the Council of Trent Anathema's
"Canon 24. “If any one saith, that the justice received is not preserved and also increased before God through good works; but that the said works are merely the fruits and signs of Justification obtained, but not a cause of the increase thereof; let him be anathema.”
This clearly denies what we say in that works are "necessary" but only in the sense that they are fruit or evidence of justification. They clearly combine the two and curse us for not doing so. Of course the danger is that we will get it in our minds that the merits of our justification include more than Christ, which is clearly warned against in Galatians.
I've often wondered, at the level of a layman in a church, how much it matters in a practical sense if for instance a Catholic truly believes that all the merits relating to salvation are only from the work of Christ but that works are necessary if life is continued for some time. The Protestants also teach that if life is continued that works are inevitable and therefore could be said to be essential, as long as it is understood that it is not providing any additional merit towards justification.
If you read Trent it is obvious that it was designed to refute the Reformers. (Reading Owen will confirm that.) But really from a purely layman standpoint the differences are subtle and that is why I don't tend to condemn individual members of a Catholic church lightly. Neither did Spurgeon, or the Puritans, or J.C. Ryle for that matter. But, in practice I find the average Catholic knows nothing of the true gospel or how to be saved. Unfortunately, neither do most mainline Protestants and many Baptists. God help us all.