For dispensationalists
Do you believe that the reinstitution of the sacrifice is efficacious in nature?
Thanks
Do you believe that the reinstitution of the sacrifice is efficacious in nature?
Thanks
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
For dispensationalists
Do you believe that the reinstitution of the sacrifice is efficacious in nature?
Thanks
Not instead of Jesus.For dispensationalists
Do you believe that the reinstitution of the sacrifice is efficacious in nature?
Thanks
Not instead of Jesus.
What sacrifices do you find?
Unless I am missing something I don’t expect a millennium of animal sacrifices.
Hebrews 10:5
Wherefore when he cometh into the world, he saith, Sacrifice and offering thou wouldest not, but a body hast thou prepared me:
Jonah 2:9
But I will sacrifice unto thee with the voice of thanksgiving;
I will pay that that I have vowed.
Salvation is of the LORD.
Hebrews 13:15
By him therefore let us offer the sacrifice of praise to God continually, that is, the fruit of our lips giving thanks to his name.
Efficacious in nature? I am not sure what you mean. Can you maybe ask the question differently for clarity? I am not sure what you want to know. Also, what sacrifice?For dispensationalists
Do you believe that the reinstitution of the sacrifice is efficacious in nature?
Thanks
What sacrifices are called for in the feast of tabernacles?Zech. 14:16-19
"And it shall come to pass, that every one that is left of all the nations which came against Jerusalem shall even go up from year to year to worship the King, the Lord of hosts, and to keep the feast of tabernacles.
And it shall be, that whoso will not come up of all the families of the earth unto Jerusalem to worship the King, the Lord of hosts, even upon them shall be no rain.
And if the family of Egypt go not up, and come not, that have no rain; there shall be the plague, wherewith the Lord will smite the heathen that come not up to keep the feast of tabernacles.
This shall be the punishment of Egypt, and the punishment of all nations that come not up to keep the feast of tabernacles."
What sacrifices are called for in the feast of tabernacles?
I don't know very much about but it's a celebration of harvest time. It has to do with staying outside in make shift booths in honor of their forefathers wilderness journey with Moses.
References please?All kinds of animals are sacrificed from bulls to goats and sheep.
All of the sacrifices represented the coming redemption of the Messiah with sin taken away.
Lev. 23References please?
References please?
I did a quick look and passed it by.The inquisitive one, now I've got go to my Bible and look it up, Ben.
That's not being nice to the elderly of the world!
I did a quick look and passed it by.
I went back and was a bit more thorough.
I’m in discussion mode right now. I don’t intend to sound challenging here.
I'm joking Ben, it's that I'm just lazy in my later years, and not ashamed of it.
You can read all about in Num. 29:12-40 it's also somewhere in Lev. but I'm to lazy to look it up twice.
FoT begins on the 15th day of the 7th month, and there's loads of sacrifices.
Yet another thread attacking a widely held, if errant, doctrine. Note the OP did not present the biblically correct view. Rather than tell us what the poster does NOT believe, why not tell us the correct view, such a Progressive dispensationalism which does NOT support reinstitution of any aspect of the Old Covenant which conflicts with the New Covenant.
No, it was racist nonsense in the first place.Why did dispensationalism need to become “progressive” in the first place?
Was it not correct the first time.
Maybe the Reformed view needs to be updated. When the reformers said national Israel was no more they were absolutely right, and it had been so for 1500 years. Now that would be completely wrong of course. Never has such a thing happened after so many years.Why did dispensationalism need to become “progressive” in the first place?
Was it not correct the first time.