Recently a well respected poster claimed my Christology was the heresy of Apollinarianism. I claimed it was not. I never acknowledged the poster was correct, because I did not, and the poster, as far as I know, never acknowledged I was right, either.
This failure to reach consensus is the bane of many of our threads, with no one admitting error and agreeing with the better explanation of scripture.
Lets start with a clear explanation of the doctrine of Apollinarianism. I derived this view from this website:
What is Apollinarianism?
The heresy called Apollinarianism, denied that Christ was "fully human" claiming "Jesus lacked the full human composition of body, mind, and spirit." [Emphasis added] This was also presented as Jesus "did not assume a complete human mind." [Emphasis added]
The counter view, proclaiming Apollinarianism to be heresy, rested on the view that Jesus needed a human spirit to have a complete human mind. The counter view supported their claim citing Hebrews 2:17 which reads in the NASB:
Here in the above translation we find the misleading phrase "in all things" which could reasonable be construed to include a human spirit. However, a better translation would be "according to all necessary things" which would NOT imply all things.
Another aspect of the contrary view was Jesus grew in understanding based on Luke 2:52, which was thought to mean grew in "human understanding" rather than a divine understanding of our human condition. Again, the contrary to Apollinarianism view must be read into the text.
The bottom line objection the mistaken view of Apollinarianism is stated as: "if Christ did not take on a true human mind, then He did not fully share in the condition of humankind that He came to save." [Emphasis added]
The biblical view I tried to present differed from both of these opposing views based on what scripture actually teaches.
1) Jesus did not need a fallen or unfallen "human spirit" in order to experience our human condition. He had One Spirit, the divine Spirit of the Second Person of the Trinity.
2) Jesus emptied Himself, to become the "likeness of men." Philippians 2:7 Therefore He would learn, develop His mind, just as humans do.
3) Because Jesus had a flesh and blood body, with a human brain, and received information from His physical senses, eyes, ears, touch, e.t.c, just as we do, he was tempted in every way humans are, and therefore could be the perfect and just sacrifice for the sin of humanity.
This failure to reach consensus is the bane of many of our threads, with no one admitting error and agreeing with the better explanation of scripture.
Lets start with a clear explanation of the doctrine of Apollinarianism. I derived this view from this website:
What is Apollinarianism?
The heresy called Apollinarianism, denied that Christ was "fully human" claiming "Jesus lacked the full human composition of body, mind, and spirit." [Emphasis added] This was also presented as Jesus "did not assume a complete human mind." [Emphasis added]
The counter view, proclaiming Apollinarianism to be heresy, rested on the view that Jesus needed a human spirit to have a complete human mind. The counter view supported their claim citing Hebrews 2:17 which reads in the NASB:
Therefore, in all things He had to be made like His brothers so that He might become a merciful and faithful high priest in things pertaining to God, to make reconciliation for the sins of the people. [Emphasis added]
Here in the above translation we find the misleading phrase "in all things" which could reasonable be construed to include a human spirit. However, a better translation would be "according to all necessary things" which would NOT imply all things.
Another aspect of the contrary view was Jesus grew in understanding based on Luke 2:52, which was thought to mean grew in "human understanding" rather than a divine understanding of our human condition. Again, the contrary to Apollinarianism view must be read into the text.
The bottom line objection the mistaken view of Apollinarianism is stated as: "if Christ did not take on a true human mind, then He did not fully share in the condition of humankind that He came to save." [Emphasis added]
The biblical view I tried to present differed from both of these opposing views based on what scripture actually teaches.
1) Jesus did not need a fallen or unfallen "human spirit" in order to experience our human condition. He had One Spirit, the divine Spirit of the Second Person of the Trinity.
2) Jesus emptied Himself, to become the "likeness of men." Philippians 2:7 Therefore He would learn, develop His mind, just as humans do.
3) Because Jesus had a flesh and blood body, with a human brain, and received information from His physical senses, eyes, ears, touch, e.t.c, just as we do, he was tempted in every way humans are, and therefore could be the perfect and just sacrifice for the sin of humanity.