• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Recent content by Logos1560

  1. L

    Is Ussher's Bible Chronology correct?

    Douglas Woodward reported that Justin Martyr (100-165) “states in numerous passages that the Jews altered their Bible, thinking that could keep their Jewish fold from fleeing to the Christians” (Septuagint, p. 65). Douglas Woodward quoted an article by Jeremy Sexton and Henry Smith, Jr. where...
  2. L

    Is Ussher's Bible Chronology correct?

    Douglas Woodward asked: "Is the evidence plain enough to justify the claims that rabbinical schools at the end of the first century intentionally corrupted what became the Masoretic Text?" (Rebooting the Bible, Part One, p. 105). Douglas Woodward listed "Key Salvific and Messianic Passages...
  3. L

    Is Ussher's Bible Chronology correct?

    Here are a couple examples of the difference in the chronology between Josephus' translation of Hebrew sacred books that is in agreement with the old Greek Septuagint and the chronology in the KJV translated from the Hebrew Masoretic Text. Flavius Josephus as translated by William Whiston...
  4. L

    Is Ussher's Bible Chronology correct?

    Douglas Woodward wrote: "[James] Ussher relied upon the genealogies of Genesis 5 and 11, as published a few decades earlier (1611) in the King James Bible" (Rebooting the Bible, Part One, p. 137). Douglas Woodward quoted where Henry B. Smith, Jr., wrote: "Ephraem of Syria [306-373 A. D.] is...
  5. L

    New Book on the Doctrine of Scripture

    The earlier manuscript portions of the Greek Septuagint could not have come from the later Codex Vaticanus or Codex alexandrinis. Edmon Gallagher wrote: "Our earliest manuscripts of the Septuagint usually contain only one biblical book, at least in their preserved form. The earliest manuscripts...
  6. L

    New Book on the Doctrine of Scripture

    The KJV translators also consulted the Greek Septuagint and Jerome's Roman Catholic Latin Vulgate. Erasmus added some readings to his edited Greek text from an edition of the Roman Catholic Latin Vulgate. KJV defender Edward F. Hills acknowledged that “sometimes also the influence of the...
  7. L

    New Book on the Doctrine of Scripture

    It has been substantiated that the NKJV is as faithfully based on the Textus Receptus as the pre-1611 English Bibles are and as the 1611 KJV is.
  8. L

    New Book on the Doctrine of Scripture

    I have this book IT IS WRITTEN: A BELIEVER'S GUIDE TO THE DOCTRINE OF SCRIPTURE, and I have read it. Graham Chewter wrote: “This claim of perfection is held by the ‘King James Only’ movement which arose during the 1970s and was spearheaded by the late Peter Ruckman” (Hooper, It Is Written, p...
  9. L

    Critical warning for KJB believers from Bryan Ross

    G. John Rov wrote: “At the heart of the King James Bible issue is this right here, to believe God” (Called of God, p. 38). G. John Rov asserted: “You can never bear perfect fruit if you have not believed on the King James Bible” (Concealed from Christians, p. 166). John Rov wrote: “Are you...
  10. L

    Is the 1611 KJV a hybrid translation?

    Gail Riplinger asserted that Miles Coverdale “was intimately involved in the process of the Bible’s being ’given’ (2 Tim. 3:16) and ’purified’ (Ps. 12:6, 7) in English” (Hazardous Materials, p. 1165). Gail Riplinger maintained that “God entrusted Wycliffe and Coverdale with the transmission of...
  11. L

    Is the 1611 KJV a hybrid translation?

    KJV defender David Sorenson identified the 1535 Coverdale’s Bible as “a hybrid translation” (Faithful Word, p. 102) [bold type added]. Orlaith O’Sullivan maintained that Coverdale’s “1535 Bible relies heavily on [George] Joye’s earlier translations” of the books of Psalms, “Isaiah, Jeremiah...
  12. L

    Critical warning for KJB believers from Bryan Ross

    KJV defender B=AZX3IczX26Ewem70SmHJ5yRwhnOFFZ58MzdiUJYkryEoeBViEAM3mJnPE1dri4LzQa_WLZkllBqUlCN9py44RK1u4SLXDLlXtL7N4VXbna9-j9aBc2__j5nNGqNIXR6qkaTLCNc67QKsFNNiP_F2Rc8iVwHB97Y4m--wkc_Cv60E4ahxsb4-YOaSU2io5XMAZ7UsC3KAXOrU__CbNngma4-t&__tn__=-UC%2CP-R']ryan Ross wrote: "This is a critical warning...
  13. L

    Do Wikipedia donations go toward paying liberal activists to rewrite articles?

    https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/wikipedia-donations-go-toward-paying-liberal-activists-to-rewrite-articles/ar-AA1QroVA?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531&cvid=6917af1128cf4a73a5cded50a4a4a1a8&ei=21...
  14. L

    Is this common sense?

    Mike Holloway claimed: “If a Bible has but one mistake in it, it cannot be the Bible” (Common Sense and the King James Bible, p. 110). Mike Holloway asserted: “If a Bible contains a single error, it is not a Bible and should be discarded forever” (p. 97).
  15. L

    Is this common sense?

    Mike Holloway wrote: “The KJV is God’s divine seed, because it is the Word of God. It is not a tool of the Holy Spirit; it is the Holy Spirit in printed form” (Common Sense and the King James Bible, pp. 122-123). It is clear that Mike Holloway claimed that "it [the KJV] is the Holy Spirit in...
Top