Recent content by Logos1560

https://davemallinak.com/2025/05/20/is-the-king-james-version-inspired/?fbclid=IwY2xjawKZtSdleHRuA2FlbQIxMQBicmlkETExOTVicjhTcmt6S2MxTFFBAR5_cX6Xm6G5asy6zOqMPyZ7LG_uMCDPnLu3UNOOBL6RPOkOOBIqi7fp1uGL_g_aem_ran903nc0w21NN-DycyjwQ

Examples in first 12 chapters of Acts where the 1560 Geneva Bible and the NKJV seem to agree in differing from the KJV. Acts 1:3 presented (Geneva, NKJV) shewed (KJV) Acts 1:3 that he had suffered (Geneva) his passion (KJV) His suffering (NKJV) Acts 1:4 he commanded (Geneva) commanded (KJV) He...

Yes, if her own logic was applied consistently and justly, the NKJV should be considered "practically identical" to the KJV. I have found many pages of places where the KJV improved on the Geneva Bible that the NKJV is in agreement with the KJV. I also found many pages of renderings where...

Gail Riplinger maintained that the earlier English Bibles such as Tyndale's and the Geneva are "practically identical to the KJV" (Language of the KJB, p. 5). Gail Riplinger asserted: “Generally speaking the early English Bibles are the same” (In Awe, p. 130). Gail Riplinger wrote: “This...

In an appendix entitled “When and how we get our Bible,” a Sunday School Scholars’ Edition of the KJV stated that the Geneva Bible “is pre-eminently the Protestant Bible” (p. 6). In 1772, David Durell (Hebrew scholar and friend of Benjamin Blayney and who assisted Blayney in the making of the...

Some KJV-only advocates in effect suggest that the KJV directs them into the human, non-scriptural KJV-only doctrine, which is false doctrine. In my opinion, they actually read their human KJV-only opinions into verses in the KJV that do not teach them. Some KJV-only advocates may be somewhat...