• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Recent content by Logos1560

  1. L

    In defense of the King James Bible and doctrine

    Your opinion, observation, and conclusion is incorrect and not true. You have been misinformed. English Bible translations such as the 1833 Webster’s Bible, the 1842 revision of the KJV by Baptists, the 1962 Teen-age Version of the Holy Bible by Jay Green, the 1982 NKJV, the 1986 Literal...
  2. L

    Questions for a derived inspiration argument

    In his article entitled “Did Our Inspired Bible Expire?”, Herb Evans [follower of Peter Ruckman's tenets] claimed: “God breathed the breath of life into the Scripture, never to be breathed into again. The Bible that we have today (A.V. 1611) is alive! Inspired! It still has God’s Breath in it...
  3. L

    PETER RUCKMAN'S Tenants are Indefensibly Heretical and Seen as Pure Error by Me and Most Bible Believers.

    Herb Evans was a follower and sometimes an instructor of Peter Ruckman or both. Herb Evans contributed to Peter Ruckman's tenets, especially his definition of Scripture and inspiration. Just as Roman Catholics make salvation depend on their church, some KJV-only advocates attempt to make...
  4. L

    In defense of the King James Bible and doctrine

    The website that you recommended had the following assertion by Cooper Abrams that is quoted above. Cooper Abrams' claim is simply not true. All modern English translations are not based on corrupt Greek manuscripts and the Westcott-Hort Greek text. Having read and studied the KJV over 60...
  5. L

    Questions for a derived inspiration argument

    Perhaps you jump to a wrong conclusion as you seem to conflate pointing out the flaws with KJV-onlyism as supposedly being negative concerning the KJV. Saying negative things about modern, human, non-scriptural KJV-only teaching is not at all the same thing as saying negative things about the...
  6. L

    Questions for a derived inspiration argument

    My eyes and ears are already open in contradiction to your bogus false implication. The indwelling Holy Spirit of truth guides me as much as you could assume that He guides you. You keep misrepresenting and twisting what I state into things that I did not state. You fail to demonstrate from...
  7. L

    The "scriptures" are said to be "Given by the Inspiration of God", and I, therefore, say "The Bible we hold in our is Inspired."

    You removed the name of the person who stated the quotation as you seem to try to blame me for what Peter Ruckman stated. In the March, 2009, issue of his publication Bible Believers’ Bulletin, Peter Ruckman wrote: “So instead of claiming ‘inspiration’ for what they wrote, the King James...
  8. L

    What Saith the Lord?

    Are there not any words in the KJV that many present readers would think that they know their meaning when they really don’t know the actual meaning intended by the KJV translators? Has it been proven with absolute certainty that no present KJV readers read a different meaning into some of its...
  9. L

    The "scriptures" are said to be "Given by the Inspiration of God", and I, therefore, say "The Bible we hold in our is Inspired."

    There is not probably at all for your unsupported, bogus false accusation that would bear false witness. I do not work for, and I do not get paid by any Bible publisher as you improperly try to imply or suggest. You have implied this bogus completely-false accusation several times. My first...
  10. L

    PETER RUCKMAN'S Tenants are Indefensibly Heretical and Seen as Pure Error by Me and Most Bible Believers.

    You seem to describe your own comments more than mine. You have chosen to focus on personal attacks on my honesty and beliefs instead of engaging in serious discussion. You prove no contradictory assertions on my part. I have not made false accusation against God's children, but you have made...
  11. L

    What Saith the Lord?

    Appendix 50 in this book is entitled "150 False Friends in the King James Version", and those 150 words are listed (pp. 294-295). The 38 words are the words that are discussed.
  12. L

    PETER RUCKMAN'S Tenants are Indefensibly Heretical and Seen as Pure Error by Me and Most Bible Believers.

    Are Peter Ruckman's tenants (that would follow from his definitions of scripture and inspiration) clearly rejected as pure error when his underlying assumed definitions seem to be accepted or followed? Was Peter Ruckman also indebted to Herb Evans for his new definition of Scripture? Peter...
  13. L

    The King James Translation

    Your diversionary question applies to your own unproven, inconsistent views. Do you point to any perfect Bible that was on earth before 1611 and that still exists on earth? I cannot remember you ever saying what the perfect Bible on earth before 1611, before 1769, or before 1869 was. The 1611...
  14. L

    Questions for a derived inspiration argument

    Yes, inspiration answers a question of origin. The process of copying the Scriptures and the process of translating the Scriptures were not the same as the different process of giving all Scripture or God breathing out the words to the prophets and apostles. Your posts and position seem...
  15. L

    The King James Translation

    Perhaps you have it backwards since that seems to be your own quest in your strawman misrepresentations and distortions of my consistent scripturally-based position. You have not admitted that you are wrong in making false accusations and in your strawmen distortions. You seem to be using...
Top