Recent content by Logos1560

KJV-only advocates suggest that the ways of God are to turn over his testimony to one exclusive translation committee of biased, doctrinally-unsound Church of England critics who decided to add another English translation to a list of multiple earlier English Bible translations. Do the ways of...

Your question was answered. Are you the one trying to make this about me and others who think differently than you? You seem to be guilty of what you accuse others. You avoid answering questions that you are asked. You do not practice what you preach concerning the fear of God. You avoid...

How do you show that you truly and consistently fear God when you disregard His strong condemnation of the use of divers measures [double standards] as being an abomination to the LORD? Divers weights and divers measures, both of them are alike abominations to the LORD (Prov. 20:10). Is the...

Do you ignore and avoid the fact that the KJV sometimes used transliteration instead of translation? The Church of England makers of the KJV took some liberties in the translating process as they changed some renderings in the pre-1611 word of God in English to make them more favorable to...

Updating the archaic language in the KJV has been done, but KJV-only advocates attack and condemn English Bibles that do that. These Bibles [the 1982 NKJV, the 1987 Literal Translation in The Interlinear Bible, the 1990 Modern King James Version, the 1994 21st Century King James Version, the...

Your question was soundly answered. You dodge and avoid what I actually stated as you ask a question that attempts to put words in my mouth that I did not suggest. It may be KJV-only reasoning that seems to suggest that God is not engaged in the maintenance of His word testimony in...

The Scriptures do not teach that God ordained the making of the 1611 KJV. The Scriptures do not state nor teach that the word of God is bound to the textual criticism decisions, Bible revision decisions, and translation decisions of one exclusive group of Church of England critics in 1611...

The 1611 KJV was the new modern translation in 1611, and it was a revision of multiple, varying pre-1611 translations. Incomplete list of some new Bibles made before 1901 Haak’s 1657 English translation of 1637 Dutch Staten Bible 1755 N. T. by John Wesley; whole English translation later...

Here are some examples of KJV-only authors asserting non-true claims including this enduring myth concerning KJV editions. Timothy Morton contended that "the 1762 and 1769 [editions] were to update the spelling" and that "by 1769 whatever slight textual errors that still remained were removed...

KJV-only advocate Matthew Verschuur asserted: “One of the most enduring myths regarding the King James Bible is that the common and standard edition in use in the 20th and 21st centuries is the 1769 Edition” (Vintage Bibles, p. 47). KJV defender Laurence Vance wrote: “There are 750 differences...

If the preservation of the Scriptures depended upon a continual miracle of God or on repeated miracles as some TR-only or KJV-only reasoning suggests, why was there any need for these scriptural instructions/warnings (Deut. 4:2, Deut. 12:32, Prov. 30:6, Rev. 22:18-19)? These verses (Deut. 4:2...

Since the law or word of the LORD is perfect (Ps. 19:7, James 1:25) and since by definition perfection would exclude the presence of even one imperfection, would imperfect or inaccurate renderings made by men or any errors introduced by men be identical to the absolutely perfect words of God...

Blind faith in Matthew Verschuur's human ex cathedra claims or someone else's claims concerning this edition of the KJV is not biblical faith in what God actually stated in Scripture. Teaching cannot be truly taught as an actual Bible doctrine of God when it is based on blind faith in human...

This revised KJV edition is the one supposedly protected or guarded by the elders [Craig Savige, Samantha Savige, Matthew Verschuur] of the Pentecostal Victory Faith Centre in Australia. Matthew Verschuur claimed: “As for variations in the Pure Cambridge Edition, these have also been settled and...

Does God say clearly that Revelation 22:19 is stated concerning post-NT Bible translations? If you apply Revelation 22:19 to post-NT English Bible translations, the KJV would be in violation of this verse according to a consistent application of your interpretation.