Recent content by Logos1560

How do KJV-only advocates rationalize or excuse in their minds the improper, bogus attempt to associate the word of God in present standard English in the NKJV with the New World Translation of Jehovah's Witnesses? That attempt is wrong and unscriptural.

This misleading diversion concerning Acts 3:26 is not the subject of this thread concerning Isaiah 14:12. Your post seems to depend upon the unsound use of fallacies such as the fallacy of guilt by association and upon use of divers measures [an abomination to the LORD (Proverbs 20:10)]. The...

This diversion concerning 1 Corinthians 1:18 is not the subject of this thread concerning Isaiah 14:12. Your post seems to depend upon the unsound use of fallacies such as the fallacy of guilt by association and upon use of divers measures [an abomination to the LORD (Proverbs 20:10)]. The...

At Deuteronomy 14:5, the KJV has a rendering based on either the Greek Septuagint or Jerome's Latin Vulgate. [Hebrew, dishon; Greek LXX, pygargos; Latin Vulgate, pygargus] pygarg (KJV) Did the KJV’s rendering “pygarg” (Deut. 14:5) come from a Hebrew-Latin lexicon which had the rendering of the...

Modern non-scriptural KJV-only teaching adds to the word of God or by eisegesis reads into verses KJV-only opinions that they do not teach. Matthew Verschuur is a Pentecostal KJV-only preacher who is behind KJV-only claims for a claimed Pure Cambridge Edition of the KJV. He connects...

You seem to be confused. Jack Hyles' new KJV-only view is evident in his 1993 book entitled Enemies of Soul Winning with its fifth chapter being entitled "False Bibles--an Enemy of Soul Winning". This 1993 book was published over 10 years after John R. Rice's death. That 1993 book is not the...

I did not claim that God lost it. Perhaps your own KJV-only reasoning/teaching seems to suggest that God failed to preserve the same exact original-language words of Scripture He gave by inspiration to the prophets and apostles well enough for them to remain the standard and greater authority...

That assertion is not true. You bear false witness. I believe that all Scripture given by inspiration of God to the prophets and apostles is 100% absolutely pure and perfect. The KJV was not given by a direct miracle of inspiration of God as proven by the actual proven errors in the 1611...

You fail to prove your opinion to be true. The over 2,000 changes, revisions, and corrections made to the 1611 edition of the KJV involved more than just correction of printer errors.

Jack Hyles changed his views concerning the KJV. In his book Let's Study the Revelation, Jack Hyles clearly was not KJV-only as Hyles advocated some readings in the book of Revelation that are found in the Critical Text. At some point after John R. Rice passed away, Jack Hyles would change...

Are you objecting to the KJV's archaic rendering "divers measures"? Is the NKJV's rendering "diverse measures" better?

You do not prove the accusation in your question to be true. The KJV is a modern version so are you suggesting that it rejects the Hebrew in many places? Dr. James D. Price identified and listed what he asserted are “82 justifiable emendations to the Masoretic text” in the Second Rabbinic...

No one is pretending that you are KJV-only since your own posts show that you are. Your bogus, false accusation that I am supposedly taking swipes at the KJV [God's Holy Bible] displays KJV-only reasoning. It is clear from your posts that you believe that the KJV is the only English Bible...

You misrepresent and distort the view of believers who disagree with human, non-scriptural KJV-only reasoning. We do not at all present "a weak and pathetic god" as you falsely allege. I believe God was just as faithful to keep all His promises concerning His words before 1611 as afterwards...

The accusations against the NKJV are misleading and unjust when different measures/standards are applied to the making of the NKJV than are applied to the making of the KJV. The KJV did change and remove stuff that is found in the Bishops' Bible of which it is a revision so are you suggesting...