Recent content by Silverhair

Well you are right there is a difference between legal and moral. And the US was wrong on both counts.

Don't know. Do you know for sure or are you just going to speculate?

You are trying to justify an illegal act.

Well I guess that would make me a racist. You have to wonder where they come up with all this things. People must really be bored or looking for a way to cause other people some grief. I tend to agree about your comment on elections. That is why you do not see many liberals elected in Alberta...

When you use a military force to enter another country and kidnap the leader of that country then you have invaded that country. You can deny that all you want Jon but the fact is they did just that. But we are just going to disagree so we can leave it at that.

The UK more so than all the EU has fallen into the trap of trying to be careful not to offend anyone. Well except for Christians. We see the same thing here in Canada. We actually had one of the liberal cabinet members say that the bible contains hate speech. He sees it as hateful to point out...

Jon you continue to ignore the reality of the situation. US forces went into another country without being invited and then kidnapped the leader of that country. They invaded the country. It does not matter how large the force was it was a military force that used force to enter and carry out...

These question do relate to your OP.

Unless Maduro's compound was outside Venezuela, which it was not, then the US did invade Venezuela. Yes our government is going down that road and I am not pleased to see it happening. But we also know that this will become more obvious worldwide as time draws to a close.

Why do you think that the KJV is the only preserved text? Do you think modern bibles just dropped in any word they felt like doing? Why ask someone to struggle with the 1769 KJV when it is not necessary?

My question is why stick with an archaic text when you have bibles written in modern English NASB, NKJV, BSB etc.

What you just said is a contradiction. You say they "did not invade Venezuela" but then say they "launched targeted strikes and a specialized raid". Was that raid done on US territory or on that of another sovereign country? Since they were not invited to enter Venezuela then the US forces...

Yes the US and Canada can pursue criminals overseas but that does not give either country the right to invade another country as the US did. Maduro may have been a criminal and if he went to the US or a country that had an extradition treaty with the US then they could have legally pressed for...

So if we believed that video Ukraine is able to push Russia back with only 10%.

We still circle back to what I posted re free speech. But you can thank the failed liberal Trudeau for that stupid rule. But then again there any number of dumb laws on the books in the Canada and the US. I agree. But your US law does not apply outside the US. So the US invaded another...