• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Speaking in Tongues Volume 4...

D28guy

New Member
And off we go...

I'll start V4 by copying over my last post from V3...

music4Him,

</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />"I can't believe how mis-informed some are, about people who speak in tongues."
It staggers the mind a bit, doesnt it?

And it seems to be fueled by something that I would almost describe as a hatred for that particular gift of the Holy Spirit, or at least those gifted with it.

It sort of reminds me of how the legalistic pharisees responded to Christ so much of the time. He simply went about doing good, and yet those ones were so often "gnashing their teeth" and "mocking" and trying to "trick Him up" and "reviling" Him, etc etc etc.

I've noticed...and I have been born again for 23 years now...that in Charismatic and Pentecostal fellowships these dear people are just about the sweetest most loving and "fruitful" born again people you would ever want to meet. There seems to be an openess and genuineness to the love and fellowship that is very unique. I believe its nothing less than the sweet anointing of the Holy Spirit in those place, where the Holy Spirit is welcomed in His fullness.

And yet...these dear people are mocked, ridiculed, slandered, and even condemned sometimes.

(and everything they are mocked for is backed up with reams of scripture...taken in context and "rightly divided.")

I praise God for the Baptists and Southern Baptists. I really do. There is so much that they give to the body of Christ, and I have so much in common with them. But one of these days God is going to blow a refreshing and life giving new "Wind" into some of these fellowships, and my oh my are some people going to be suprised by what happens to them!

(It'll be a very blessed surprise!)
thumbs.gif


In~His~Grace~

Mike</font>[/QUOTE]
 

Ray Berrian

New Member
In the early chapters of Hebrews God killed all the complaining Israelites because of their immediate distress in the wilderness. The Lord said they will not enter the rest. Some think it means the 'rest' of entering Heaven, while I believe the 'rest' was the Promised Land.

How can Christians be at rest in their souls when they speak against the Holy Spirit with His manifested gifts in various churches--seen and experienced by millions of believers in Jesus Christ?
 

DHK

<b>Moderator</b>
Originally posted by D28guy:
I've noticed...and I have been born again for 23 years now...that in Charismatic and Pentecostal fellowships these dear people are just about the sweetest most loving and "fruitful" born again people you would ever want to meet. There seems to be an openess and genuineness to the love and fellowship that is very unique. I believe its nothing less than the sweet anointing of the Holy Spirit in those place, where the Holy Spirit is welcomed in His fullness.
There are "sweet dear loving" among Islam, and almost every other religion also. Don't have the narrow mindset that such people are only found among born again Christians. It is my personal belief that "Mother Theresa," because of her aberrant theology was not saved. I hope I am wrong. But that being the case, most Christians I meet don't begin to match up to her "sweet loving spirit; her dedication, her good works, etc." But sweetness of spirit and good works don't save. Don't get sucked in. We don't base our theology on experience but rather on the Word of God.
Give credible evidence that the general phenomena of the Charismatic phenomena of today is what was happening in the Bible. It is not. In the Bible the spoke in different languages. They are listed in Acts 2. How clear can it be. They spoke in other tongues (different languages). That miracle never changed from Acts 2 to 1Cor.14. They spoke in different languages, different foreign languages that could be interpreted back into Greek or Hebrew, as the situation warranted. Does that happen today? No, of course not. Gibberish is not a gift of the Holy Spirit. It is, at the best, a psychological emotional high; at the worst it could be demon possession. If it is of the spirit it is not the Holy Spirit, but another spirit.
It has not been demonstrated that this ability to speak gibberish has any relevance to the Biblical gift of speaking in other languages, which of course has now ceased.
DHK
 

DHK

<b>Moderator</b>
Originally posted by Ray Berrian:
In the early chapters of Hebrews God killed all the complaining Israelites because of their immediate distress in the wilderness. The Lord said they will not enter the rest. Some think it means the 'rest' of entering Heaven, while I believe the 'rest' was the Promised Land.
Who is complainig here? The oned' complaining are pro-tongues like yourself, that people like myself would dare to point out theological error in the heresy of speaking in tongues. It is not a Biblical gift. It is not even speaking in tongues or languages, but rather gibberish or non-sense syllables strung together that make no sense at all to either God or man.

How can Christians be at rest in their souls when they speak against the Holy Spirit with His manifested gifts in various churches--seen and experienced by millions of believers in Jesus Christ?
How can one speak against the Holy Spirit when that which is spoken is not of God, and is sometimes straight from the pit of Hell. To point out error is not to speak against the Holy Spirit but rather to speak out for God.

Matthew 7:22-23 Many will say to me in that day, Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in thy name? and in thy name have cast out devils? and in thy name done many wonderful works? And then will I profess unto them, I never knew you: depart from me, ye that work iniquity.
DHK
 

Ray Berrian

New Member
DHK,

You said, 'There are "sweet dear loving" among Islam, and almost every other religion also. Don't have the narrow mindset that such people are only found among born again Christians. It is my personal belief that "Mother Theresa," because of her aberrant theology was not saved. I hope I am wrong. But that being the case, most Christians I meet don't begin to match up to her "sweet loving spirit; her dedication, her good works, etc." But sweetness of spirit and good works don't save. Don't get sucked in. We don't base our theology on experience but rather on the Word of God.
Give credible evidence that the general phenomena of the Charismatic phenomena of today is what was happening in the Bible. It is not. In the Bible the spoke in different languages. They are listed in Acts 2. How clear can it be. They spoke in other tongues (different languages). That miracle never changed from Acts 2 to 1Cor.14. They spoke in different languages, different foreign languages that could be interpreted back into Greek or Hebrew, as the situation warranted. Does that happen today? No, of course not. Gibberish is not a gift of the Holy Spirit. It is, at the best, a psychological emotional high; at the worst it could be demon possession. If it is of the spirit it is not the Holy Spirit, but another spirit.
It has not been demonstrated that this ability to speak gibberish has any relevance to the Biblical gift of speaking in other languages, which of course has now ceased.'

Some of what you say I can agree with you.

As you said anyone can discipline themselves into be a good and moral person whether Islamic, Jewish, Protestant, Catholic or any other religious group. I went along with Mother Theresa until she spoke of all religions being adequate for people going to Heaven. This is outrageous! Jesus is the only Way to Heaven. [John 14:6].

Yes, the Word of God is our final authority for faith and practice of the religion of Jesus Christ. While we are saved by our faith in Christ, we none the less must produce 'good works' as proof of our eternal salvation. In fact, in Ephesians 2:10 God speaking through Paul suggests that Jesus already has a plan for each of us who become saved that will include 'godly works' for His glory and praise.

The events of Acts and the Corinthian church are completely different. With all due respect to you, you need to study several other commentators on the Word and come up with a better defense than you 'psychological and demonic' theological spin.

In Acts those filled with the Spirit spoke in an escatic language in the streets of Jerusalem and yet to the ear of the people from many many nations they understood in their own language.

In I Corinthians 12 & 14 Paul is not saying they are on a psychological or spiritual high or that they were demon possessed when some people spoke in 'tongues.' He was merely correcting those who spoke in tongues without someone there with the gift of 'interpretation of tongues.'

In I Cor. 12:4 Paul does not say, 'Now there are diversities of gifted demons, but he does say, '... there are diversities of gifts, by the same Holy Spirit.'

As many parts of the human body make up one person, so too, the Lord gifts each of us with various abilities coming from the Spirit of God. [vss. 15-20].

Not every Christian will have the 'gift of tongues.' [vs. 30].

In I Cor. 14:1b says, that we should 'desire spiritual gifts.'

Paul says, 'I wish you all spoke with tongues,[14:5a] though he knew by his other utterance that not everyone would have this ability. [12:30].

Everyone who is saved has the Holy Spirit so 'the gift of tongues' is not proof of being baptized into the Spirit. This happens when we are saved. [I Cor. 12:13].

The tongues that Paul is speaking about was one in which the worshiper did not understand himself, so it was not his native language [I Cor. 14:14]. This 'gift of tongues' was an estatic language.

Paul said that he spoke in 'tongues' more than any other worshiper of the Lord God. [14:18].

Tongues in relation to lost souls, was a sign that the unsaved were not saved, or they would have known of this experience by some Christians. [14:22].

At various times in the church at Corinth, the phenemenon of 'tongues' with 'interpretation'and in one service it could happen up to three times, but everything had to be done in order and reverence toward the Lord. [14:27].

While preaching in the language of the people present at the assembly was most vital, Paul says also, 'do not forbid people to speak with tongues.' [14:39]

Paul spoke in tongues more than the other Christians, so we can well understand that he would say, 'forbid not people who speak in 'tongues,' but make sure there is order becoming the Presence of the Lord God.

I have more to say but this is enough for one posting.
.

Berrian, Th.D.
 

DHK

<b>Moderator</b>
Originally posted by Ray Berrian:
The events of Acts and the Corinthian church are completely different. With all due respect to you, you need to study several other commentators on the Word and come up with a better defense than you 'psychological and demonic' theological spin.
Since all commentaries don't agree it is obvious that all commentaries aren't right. Lay your commentaries down and look at the Scriptures with me, and if necessary we will consult the Greek.
In Acts those filled with the Spirit spoke in an escatic language in the streets of Jerusalem and yet to the ear of the people from many many nations they understood in their own language.
No one spoke in an ecstatic language! This is error to the nth degree. There is no Biblical evidence in the Bible anywhere. It is all in your imagination. If you have Biblcal evidence show it. Just stating it to be so doesn't make it true. Take a look at the main event of Acts chapter two: "Speaking in languages on the Day of Pentecost."

Acts 2:2-4 And suddenly there came a sound from heaven as of a rushing mighty wind, and it filled all the house where they were sitting. And there appeared unto them cloven tongues like as of fire, and it sat upon each of them. And they were all filled with the Holy Ghost, and began to speak with other tongues, as the Spirit gave them utterance.

Acts 2:4 They were all filled with the Holy Spirit, and began to speak with other languages, as the Spirit gave them the ability to speak. (WEB)
--You will find that most other translations translate "tongues" as languages, as does the WEB, in this case. That is what it means--languages--real actual foreign languages, just as most Bibles translate it.

Now using this one verse alone, Ray, tell me its meaning, and how you derive the meaning. If it means anything else but actual foreign languages where do you get that meaning from?
The Greek word is "glossa" It has no other meaning but an actual real language.

In I Corinthians 12 & 14 Paul is not saying they are on a psychological or spiritual high or that they were demon possessed when some people spoke in 'tongues.' He was merely correcting those who spoke in tongues without someone there with the gift of 'interpretation of tongues.'
Explain this passage to me Ray:

1 Corinthians 12:1-3 Now concerning spiritual gifts, brethren, I would not have you ignorant. Ye know that ye were Gentiles, carried away unto these dumb idols, even as ye were led. Wherefore I give you to understand, that no man speaking by the Spirit of God calleth Jesus accursed: and that no man can say that Jesus is the Lord, but by the Holy Ghost.

What was happening here Ray? What is your interpretation? I hope it makes sense.

In I Cor. 12:4 Paul does not say, 'Now there are diversities of gifted demons, but he does say, '... there are diversities of gifts, by the same Holy Spirit.'
Isn't it odd you should leave out the first three verses? :rolleyes:
He also never, never says "gifts of gibberish."

As many parts of the human body make up one person, so too, the Lord gifts each of us with various abilities coming from the Spirit of God. [vss. 15-20].

Not every Christian will have the 'gift of tongues.' [vs. 30].
But every Chatismatic thinks they should. That in itself tells you they have a wrong theology.
Also it speaks of a Biblical gift--the gift of languages, as is shown here:

1 Corinthians 12:30 Do all have gifts of healings? Do all speak with various languages? Do all interpret?
--But the Charismatics don't have that. They practice the psychological "ability" to speak in gibberish.
In I Cor. 14:1b says, that we should 'desire spiritual gifts.'
Gibberish is not a gift. The gift of speaking in foreign languages was the Biblical gift of tongues. But that ended at the end of the first century.
Paul says, 'I wish you all spoke with tongues,[14:5a] though he knew by his other utterance that not everyone would have this ability. [12:30].
This verse is greatly misunderstood. Perhaps if I quote it from the ASV it will make a bit more sense:

1 Corinthians 14:5 Now I would have you all speak with tongues, but rather that ye should prophesy: and greater is he that prophesieth than he that speaketh with tongues, except he interpret, that the church may receive edifying.
--In other words he is saying that it is okay with me if you have the ability to speak in other languages and use it according to the restrictions that I have set down for you. That is ok with me. But it is much better for your benefit that you prophecy. It is a much more valuable and profitable gift. With prophesying everyone understands and is edified. The same is not so with speaking in a foreign language. There is absolutely nothing said here about anything ecstatic.
Everyone who is saved has the Holy Spirit so 'the gift of tongues' is not proof of being baptized into the Spirit. This happens when we are saved. [I Cor. 12:13].
Okay.
The tongues that Paul is speaking about was one in which the worshiper did not understand himself, so it was not his native language [I Cor. 14:14]. This 'gift of tongues' was an estatic language.
That is absurd! Why would a "worshiper not understand himself. I was driving someone home once. He was a youg man. I was quite a bit younger but still a college graduate and involved in Christian education at that time. When I began to approach this man's house (who was not saved, and not even graduated from high school), he began to speak about mathematical equations, trigonemtry, algebra, quantum physics, etc. He spoke in English, but of those things that he had no prior knowledge of. Where did that knowledge come from? He had been dabbling in the occult. He was demon-possessed. Now, that man was speaking of things he understood not, but he was under another power--a denomic power. Are you suggesting that all tongues-speakers are under denomic power. It sounds like it!! Of course I could almost agree with that.

The command of Paul is to always have control of your mind.:
Study to show yourselves approved unto God.
"Think on these things."
"Meditate on them day and night"
"Pray without ceasing."
2 Corinthians 10:5 casting down imaginations, and every high thing that is exalted against the knowledge of God, and bringing every thought into captivity to the obedience of Christ;
--Do you bring every thought into captivity? every thought to the obedience of Jesus Christ?
Do you have complete control of your mind.
Let this mind be in you which is also in Christ Jesus.
A Christian always must have full control of his mind (unless he is sleeping).

Paul said that he spoke in 'tongues' more than any other worshiper of the Lord God. [14:18].
Yes he did. He was more spiritual. The Corinthians who so much wanted the gift was the most carnal church mentioned in the Bible. Paul needed the gift more than any other of them because of his missionary journeys. They took him to nations far and wide where there would have been a need to speak in other foreign languages.

Tongues in relation to lost souls, was a sign that the unsaved were not saved, or they would have known of this experience by some Christians. [14:22].
Verse 22 goes with verse 21. Tongues was a sign to the unbelieving Jew, not just any unbeliever. That is why it ended in the first century. Those that crucifed the Lord died in that generation.

At various times in the church at Corinth, the phenemenon of 'tongues' with 'interpretation'and in one service it could happen up to three times, but everything had to be done in order and reverence toward the Lord. [14:27].
It wasn't a phenomena; it was a gift. Today it is a phenomena that started in the 20th century and before that time was unknown to mankind except in cults and false religions. Gibberish is a mark of a false religion, and a work of Satan.

While preaching in the language of the people present at the assembly was most vital, Paul says also, 'do not forbid people to speak with tongues.' [14:39]
He wrote that to the church at Corinth while the gift of other languages was still in operation. Since the gift is not operational today, it has no relevance to us either. Neither does cloven tongues of fire over people's heads when the pretend to speak in tongues either.
DHK
 

Ray Berrian

New Member
DHK,

You said, 'Matthew 7:22-23 Many will say to me in that day, Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in thy name? and in thy name have cast out devils? and in thy name done many wonderful works? And then will I profess unto them, I never knew you: depart from me, ye that work iniquity.'

Notice Matthew does not say, "Many will say to Me in that day, Lord, Lord, did we not speak in tongues and interpret tongues as being among those who were workers of iniquity."

The reason is because the gifts of the Holy Spirit are true as God is true and people who have these gifts are among the people of the Lord.

DHK, now really think at this point.

In I Corinthians 14:4 says that the person speaking in an unknown tongue edifies
himself . . . '. Now if the person speaking in 'tongues' was speaking in any one of the world or national languages, he would be only speaking a paragraph of words with no uplift of the human spirit. But, this is not the case, because whatever the person says in 'tongues' edifies his life which means he or she is making a connection with the Lord God in Heaven. Even if he does not have the 'interpretation of tongues' his speaking to the Lord is understood by the Lord God and the Christian is inspired in his being.

This is just another reason why the 'mega language' theory fades while under closer scrutiny of those who study the Word.
.

You said, 'Neither does cloven tongues of fire over people's heads when the pretend to speak in tongues either.'

The fire above the heads was a unique sighting on the Day of Pentecost, the day that the Holy Spirit was poured on and into the lives of those in the Upper Room.

The permanent 'gifts of the Spirit' in I Cor. 12 & 14 were unique to the people of God years after Pentecost was a memory. I am not elevating the gift of tongues but neither do I deny this gift to the Christian church.
.
 

Hope of Glory

New Member
Originally posted by Ray Berrian:
The Lord said they will not enter the rest. Some think it means the 'rest' of entering Heaven, while I believe the 'rest' was the Promised Land.

How can Christians be at rest in their souls when they speak against the Holy Spirit with His manifested gifts in various churches--seen and experienced by millions of believers in Jesus Christ?
Actually, the "rest" is a type of entering into the Kingdom, based upon the land flowing with milk and honey. The "promised land" is something they were already in when they left Egypt. Genesis 15:18 tells us, "In the same day the LORD made a covenant with Abram, saying, Unto thy seed have I given this land, from the river of Egypt unto the great river, the river Euphrates."

They began in the land of promise, were baptized in the Red Sea, and their children (except for Joshua and Caleb) were able to enter into the Kingom or the "rest".

And we can be at rest in our souls for speaking truth.
 

Rev. Lowery

New Member
DHK on this Brother I agree with you. I have seen my sister "slain in the spirit" and all manner of things and later she said she felt compelled to do it so she wouldn't fell left out. I never felt right at a service of this nature and I know I am saved and I know the Holy Ghost power and I have never felt the spirit at a service where these things take place.
 

D28guy

New Member
DHK.

"There are "sweet dear loving" among Islam, and almost every other religion also."
But they dont proclaim and lift up the Lord Jesus Christ as our only hope for salvation.

"Don't have the narrow mindset that such people are only found among born again Christians."
I was saying that among born again people, I see the evidence of the fruit of the Spirit in abundance among Charismatics and Pentecostals. And many times more abundantly than in other groups I frequent.

And along with that, we find the biblically identified gifts of the Spirit...all of them...in evidence.

"It is my personal belief that "Mother Theresa," because of her aberrant theology was not saved."
I agree.

I hope I am wrong. But that being the case, most Christians I meet don't begin to match up to her "sweet loving spirit; her dedication, her good works, etc."
I've never spent any time with her, I dont know.

"But sweetness of spirit and good works don't save."
I never said they did.

"Don't get sucked in. We don't base our theology on experience but rather on the Word of God."
Thats my whole point!

The scriptures identify certain gifts of the Spirit. They are individually identified and described. In the Charismatic and Pentecostal meetings we see them in evidence.

In more "traditional" churchs, people go to great and convoluted lengths to explain them away.

Give credible evidence that the general phenomena of the Charismatic phenomena of today is what was happening in the Bible.
Its been done more times than I can count, by myself and many others, on these 3+ volumes of this topic.

"Gibberish is not a gift of the Holy Spirit."
No kidding. When have you heard me or anyone else advocate the "gift of speaking in gibberish"

We advocate the gift of speaking in tongues.

Sometimes tongues of unlearned earthly foreign languages...as described in the scriptures.

Sometimes tongues of an unlearned heavenly foreign language, as described in the scriptures...

"Though I speak with the tongues of men and of angels, if I have not love, I have become sounding brass or clanging cymal"

"For he who speaks in a tongue does not speak to men but to God. For no one understands him. However, in the spirit he speaks mysteries".

"It is, at the best, a psychological emotional high; at the worst it could be demon possession."
The word of God...

"Though I speak with the tongues of men and of angels, if I have not love, I have become sounding brass or clanging cymal"

"For he who speaks in a tongue does not speak to men but to God. For no one understands him. However, in the spirit he speaks mysteries".

"If it is of the spirit it is not the Holy Spirit, but another spirit."
The word of God...

"And they we all filled with the Holy Spirit and began to speak with other tongues, as the Spirit gave them utterance."

"It has not been demonstrated that this ability to speak gibberish has any relevance to the Biblical gift of speaking in other languages,..."
I cant recall anyone on these boards advocating speaking by means of the gift of "speaking in gibberish".

We are advocating the gift of tongues as described in Gods scriptures.

"...which of course has now ceased.
Posted in spite of the fact that millions speak in the biblical gift of tongues every day.

Grace and peace,

Mike
 

DHK

<b>Moderator</b>
Originally posted by D28guy:
"There are "sweet dear loving" among Islam, and almost every other religion also."
[qb]
But they dont proclaim and lift up the Lord Jesus Christ as our only hope for salvation.
Ray understood my point, at least this much of it. Sweet loving people that do good works are not necessarily saved. To take it one step further: Just because a sweet loving person who does good works attends an evangelical church where he or she speaks in tongues does not mean that he or she is saved. Speaking in tongues is no guarantee of salvation, and is not an evidence of salvation.
"Don't have the narrow mindset that such people are only found among born again Christians."
I was saying that among born again people, I see the evidence of the fruit of the Spirit in abundance among Charismatics and Pentecostals. And many times more abundantly than in other groups I frequent.
"The heart is deceitful above all things and desperately wicked."
You are not God, and cannot tell who is saved and who is not. That is the whole point of the "sweet dear good ones who speak in tongues." How do you know if they are really saved? You don't. Only God does. You are simply making assumptions. The fruit of the spirit as far as its outward appearance is concerned can be closely duplicated by Satan. He is the world's best counterfeiter.
And he has been couterfeiting the gifts of the Spirit since the beginning of the 20th century when the Pentecostal/Charismatic movement began, and Christians and others have been sucikered into it ever since.
And along with that, we find the biblically identified gifts of the Spirit...all of them...in evidence.
Never seen that evidence yet.
"Don't get sucked in. We don't base our theology on experience but rather on the Word of God."
Thats my whole point!

The scriptures identify certain gifts of the Spirit. They are individually identified and described. In the Charismatic and Pentecostal meetings we see them in evidence.

In more "traditional" churchs, people go to great and convoluted lengths to explain them away.
Perhaps they are not explained away but solid Biblical evidence is given to show that they have ceased. But, as I have posted above, that evidence is ignored, and goes unrefuted.
Give credible evidence that the general phenomena of the Charismatic phenomena of today is what was happening in the Bible.
Its been done more times than I can count, by myself and many others, on these 3+ volumes of this topic.
I haven't seen any that is Biblical yet. We base theology on the Word of God, not experience. The evidence that I keep hearing is "I spoke in tongues therefore it is of God." My answer to that is: "Phooey!"
"Gibberish is not a gift of the Holy Spirit."
No kidding. When have you heard me or anyone else advocate the "gift of speaking in gibberish"

We advocate the gift of speaking in tongues.

Sometimes tongues of unlearned earthly foreign languages...as described in the scriptures.
But this doesn't happen today. You know it. And I know it. If it does happen, it is a one in a million anecdotal situation. In other words it is not normal. It is not the "gift" that all Charismatics purport they have, and you know that very well. So this particular definition is out the door.

Sometimes tongues of an unlearned heavenly foreign language, as described in the scriptures...

"Though I speak with the tongues of men and of angels, if I have not love, I have become sounding brass or clanging cymal"

"For he who speaks in a tongue does not speak to men but to God. For no one understands him. However, in the spirit he speaks mysteries".
Like I said--gibberish--not a gift at all. The stringing of nonsensical syllables together and then having the gall to call it a spiritual gift is akin to lying to the Holy Spirit. It is a carnal, fleshly, psychological high, and has nothing to do with the Holy Spirit whatsoever. There is no "heavenly language" involved hear at all. And there is no "heavenly language" spoken of in the Bible. It is all in your imagination. You have made up a new extra-biblical doctrine, just as Biblical as "purgatory." There is about as much evidence for a "heavenly language" as there is for Purgatory. Don't make things up that aren't in the Bible.
"It is, at the best, a psychological emotional high; at the worst it could be demon possession."
The word of God...

"Though I speak with the tongues of men and of angels, if I have not love, I have become sounding brass or clanging cymal"

"For he who speaks in a tongue does not speak to men but to God. For no one understands him. However, in the spirit he speaks mysteries".
You quoted two verses. So what! Without your explanation they mean what they say. You have only proved my point, because I know what they mean. If you want to prove a point you will have to give an explanation. It seems as if you have not learned the definition of the word though yet.

"If it is of the spirit it is not the Holy Spirit, but another spirit."
The word of God...

"And they we all filled with the Holy Spirit and began to speak with other tongues, as the Spirit gave them utterance."
What has that got to do with the modern day ability of speaking in gibberish? The people in Paul's day didn't speak in gibberish; they spoke in actual foreign languages, unlke people of today.
"It has not been demonstrated that this ability to speak gibberish has any relevance to the Biblical gift of speaking in other languages,..."
I cant recall anyone on these boards advocating speaking by means of the gift of "speaking in gibberish".

We are advocating the gift of tongues as described in Gods scriptures.
But that is not what you practice--not in any of your churches. That much is factual, so don't relate the two. Speaking in foreign languages miraculously is not done today, and you know that. Why do Charismatic missionaries have to go to language school just like all other missionaries? Obviously because the gift of tongues has ceased. But Paul didn't have to go to language school did he? That is why he could say to the Corinthians, "I thank God I spoke in tongues more than you all." He had need of them more than them all. He went to many different nations, of different languages where God gave him the gift of languages to communicate the gospel. He never went to mission school to learn the language.

"...which of course has now ceased.
Posted in spite of the fact that millions speak in the biblical gift of tongues every day.
In spite of the fact that millions are deceived.
Gibberish is not a language.
Biblical tongues are real foreign languages.
That doesn't happen today.
Today people speak in gibberish, not foreign languages.
By their fruit ye shall know them.
We know by the fruit of the gibberish spoken that it is a false "gift" or not even a gift at all, but an imitation of one given by the devil.
DHK
 

atestring

New Member
I agree that gibberish is not a spiritul gift.
There is no mention of giberish in the Bible.
After many challenges on this boardnobody has ever prvedthat there is a greek word for gibberish.
I do not believe that Charismatics speak gibberish.
THere are over 3500 languages in this world and "tyndale translators" are finding more languages as they translate the Bible.
If I can find a person that actually speaks over 3500 languages and will say that speaking in tongues is gibberish then we will talk.
I will even talk to a person that is fluent in 20 languages.
 

Briguy

<img src =/briguy.gif>
Mike, you bring up "speaking mysteries unto God" as a positive thing. Think that idea through once. Think about the thought of speaking something myterious to the ONE who knows everything. What is a mystery? A mystery is something unknown to the hearer but not the speaker. If a child knows which one of his siblings stole money from the parents, he knows a mystery that the parents don't know. He can choose to tell the parents of the mystery or not, but he knows what the mystery is. The parents do not know the mystery until they are told. Now, with that in mind, Can you truely speak a mystery to God?? No, you can't and Paul was rebuking what was going on with "Tongues" by using this example. Paul was speaking in a negative tone. He continued that tone and rebuked those who were speaking in tongues to self-edify or better, who after speaking in uninterpreted tongues were edified. Gifts are NEVER to edify ourselves, thus this statement is in the negative as well. 1 Cor. 12-14 are much easier if you understand the rebuking quality that they were written in. The Corinth church was a mess and a disgrace to Christians and Paul was not trying to praise them he was trying to fix them. Please let me know if you understand my point on mysteries. Thanks,

In Christ,
Brian
 

Ray Berrian

New Member
'The is no mention of gibberish in the Bible.'

Neither does the Bible talk about Raisin Bran cereal. Maybe because it has the word, sin, in it.

But, seriously, the definition of 'gibberish' means an unintelligible or meaningless language, a technical or esoteric language or a pretentious or needlessly obscure language.

And for my own clarity I looked up esoteric. It means designed for or understood by the specially initiated alone or knowledge that is restricted to a small group.

The term used by DHK may be rather close who what was happening in Corinth, because the language could not be understood by anyone except the one who 'interpreted the tongue' and obviously God. As I have thought about it there is little sarcasm in what our Canadian brother is saying. Why?

I am sure you will remember from God's Word what it says in I Corinthians 14:23 in the KJV. The Apostle Paul says that if those who have the gift use it all at one time, and unbelievers come into the assembly they will think that you are all crazy.

So to the non-Christian--the sound would appear to their hearing as gibberish, meaning a tongue not understood by anyone except the person or persons who were gifted by God to 'interpret the tongue.'

The 'gift of tongues' is an ecstatic utterance because the word means from Webster: 'of, relating to, or marked by ecstasy, a state of overwhelming emotion. Why ecstacy? Because that person is in mutual communication with the Lord God and that is why the Apostle Paul says, 'He who speaks in an unknown tongue edifies himself.' (I Corinthians 14:4a). The word 'edify' means to 'instruct or improve spiritually--to build or establish.'

Even to the saved person in church the 'tongue' certainly is not understood by any except the person with the 'gift of interpretation.'

Berrian, Th.D.
 

atestring

New Member
Originally posted by Briguy:
Mike, you bring up "speaking mysteries unto God" as a positive thing. Think that idea through once. Think about the thought of speaking something myterious to the ONE who knows everything. What is a mystery? A mystery is something unknown to the hearer but not the speaker. If a child knows which one of his siblings stole money from the parents, he knows a mystery that the parents don't know. He can choose to tell the parents of the mystery or not, but he knows what the mystery is. The parents do not know the mystery until they are told. Now, with that in mind, Can you truely speak a mystery to God?? No, you can't and Paul was rebuking what was going on with "Tongues" by using this example. Paul was speaking in a negative tone. He continued that tone and rebuked those who were speaking in tongues to self-edify or better, who after speaking in uninterpreted tongues were edified. Gifts are NEVER to edify ourselves, thus this statement is in the negative as well. 1 Cor. 12-14 are much easier if you understand the rebuking quality that they were written in. The Corinth church was a mess and a disgrace to Christians and Paul was not trying to praise them he was trying to fix them. Please let me know if you understand my point on mysteries. Thanks,

In Christ,
Brian
Edifying ones self is important.
I cannot love my neighbor as myself unless I first love myself. Would it be selfish to love myself?
Would it be wrong to be "STRONG IN THE LORD AND IN THE POWER OF HIS MIGHT?
Is it wrong to build up yourself in your most Holy Faith praying in the Holy Ghost?
A chain is no stronger than it's weakest link.
I as a link in God's kingdom have a responsiility to be edified( built up)
To not be built up would be selfish!
 

tamborine lady

Active Member
type.gif


James 3-5 Even so the tongue is a little member, and boasteth great things. Behold, how great a matter a little fire kindleth!
6 And the tongue is a fire, a world of iniquity: so is the tongue among our members, that it defileth the whole body, and setteth on fire the course of nature; and it is set on fire of hell.
7 For every kind of beasts, and of birds, and of serpents, and of things in the sea, is tamed, and hath been tamed of mankind:
8 But the tongue can no man tame; it is an unruly evil, full of deadly poison.
9 Therewith bless we God, even the Father; and therewith curse we men, which are made after the similitude of God.
10 Out of the same mouth proceedeth blessing and cursing. My brethren, these things ought not so to be.


In light of the scripture above, it is amazing to me that some proffessing Christians can tell others that they are probably demon pessessed, and call some of the gifts of the spirit
"gibberish", and yet still profess that they are absolutely right!!

Why do some people have to be right at all costs? Why do they call others all manner of names and make demeaning remarks and still proclaim"I alone am right in this matter"

Reminds me of these men:

Luke 18-10 Two men went up into the temple to pray; the one a Pharisee, and the other a publican.
11 The Pharisee stood and prayed thus with himself, God, I thank thee, that I am not as other men are, extortioners, unjust, adulterers, or even as this publican.
12 I fast twice in the week, I give tithes of all that I possess.
13 And the publican, standing afar off, would not lift up so much as his eyes unto heaven, but smote upon his breast, saying, God be merciful to me a sinner.
14 I tell you, this man went down to his house justified rather than the other: for every one that exalteth himself shall be abased; and he that humbleth himself shall be exalted.



What has this world come to when we sling nasty remarks at other Christians and take no thought at all about the consequences?
:confused:
tear.gif
:eek:

He who readeth let him understand!!

Selah,

Tam

[ January 13, 2006, 10:24 AM: Message edited by: tamborine lady ]
 

Rev. Lowery

New Member
Why is there no speaking in tongues after the apostles until present day movement no record in history or in churches. Why only one small group of Christians if I where to attend one of Benny Hinns sermons would I be slain because only he can cause the spirit to slay me can the spirit itself not do this why does the Holy Ghost need help? Why if the gift of tongues is still present does he need a translator when he speaks to Spanish speaking people? Why can a charismatic not witness to someone who speaks German if the gift of tongues is real today. When someone I know doesn't speak Icelandic witnesses to an Icelandic person in there language, with no previous knowledge of the language, then I will believe that the gift has not ceased.
 

Ray Berrian

New Member
Some people feel that 'tongues' are not always from the Lord. What about Christians who use their tongue to bad mouth the pastor or tell half-truths about he or his family causing division within the church family--the family of God? Speaking evil of he brethren happens infinitely more times that a nut who fakes have this Divine gift from the Godhead.

It seems Christians should learn to control their own tongue/language first, before seeking other 'gifts of the Spirit.' Paul says, '. . . desire spiritual gifts.' [I Corinthians 14:1b].
.

Atestring said,

'Edifying ones self is important.
I cannot love my neighbor as myself unless I first love myself. Would it be selfish to love myself?
Would it be wrong to be "STRONG IN THE LORD AND IN THE POWER OF HIS MIGHT?
Is it wrong to build up yourself in your most Holy Faith praying in the Holy Ghost?
A chain is no stronger than it's weakest link.
I as a link in God's kingdom have a responsiility to be edified( built up)
To not be built up would be selfish!'

Good post!
.
 
Top