Featured Ambiguous Word create confusion.

In every translation by or through "water." And διεσωθησαν variously translated, saved, safely, delivered, etc.

 

Wow, insulting much. This is so typical of you. "Sloppy. unstudied translation choices" indeed. Yet according to what you have said before, you have never translated, don't know the original languages of the Bible, and do not know any other languages.

(To interested parties other than Van, I am a Bible translator and teach Bible translation in seminary. This is not bragging--I'm not claiming to be good at it, but just to give my resume for the purpose of my answer.)

I'll let you go now back to your insults and ignorance, and back onto my "Ignore" list.

 

To everyone other than Van, if you are familiar with dynamic equivalence (also called functional equivalence) translating ambiguity with certainty is a DE principle "It is this approach [idiomatic translation--JoJ] That reduces ambiguity and obscurity to a minimum...." (Beekman and Callow, Translating the Word of God, p. 25).

If you are a DE translator, fine, translate implicit terms with explicit ones, translate ambiguous terms with your understanding and make the rendering of the ambiguous explicit. And tell people you are translating by the DE principles. But don't accuse people of "sloppy, unstudied" translation which then "hinder the cause of Christ" if someone disagree with you--especially if you actually have no experience in translating and know no foreign languages.

 

Note that it is not always possible to translate ambiguity with ambiguity. For example, anothen (ἀνοθεν) in Luke 1:3, "from the very first," can also be translated, "from above" or "again." There is no way to preserve the ambiguity of the original in this case. The translator must choose one or the other. This is often the case.

Having said that, there is often a way from the context to tell which is the correct meaning. Looking at the same word, anothen, in John 3:3 & 7, we see that Nicodemus understood the meaning to be "again," since since he asked if it meant he must return to his mother's womb and once again be physically born.

 

I am so blessed this morning! In chapel, we had a presentation by our translation team who went to Mexico and visited three tribal translation efforts in two weeks. I was in tears at one point. The team consisted of:

1.Miss B., our linguistics prof. She speaks seven languages, and has an MA in linguistics through SIL (Summer Institute of Linguistics; she already had an MA in education). She is leading our team to produce a translation in Rohingya, a people group with a very large population in Milwaukee but no Bible. So far they have seen only one 11 year old girl saved. Please pray for a "person of peace" to be saved, who will then be the lead translator.
2. T. is a student in our MA in Bible Translation, and a truly fine young man. I'll be teaching him for 9 weeks in "Bible Translation Theory and Practice," and I expect an A from him, since he is an excellent student and very smart. He is on the Rohingya team.
3. Miss S. is a German lady, a graduate of our MA in Bible Translation. I am so blessed to have taught her. She is very brilliant, and also on the Rohingya team.
4. Miss C. is high school senior who has a huge burden for Bible translation. She will likely matriculate in our Bible college in the fall, so I'll no doubt get to teach her Greek starting in the fall of 2024. She is a brilliant young lady, doing her "capstone project" for her senior year on how tribal languages are disappearing, so she borrowed several books from my library for that.

Consider, please, the difficulty of getting an MA in linguistics or Bible translation. Our MA is almost 40 grad credits (I think), each with about 1000 pages of reading and a project or two. The language requirements are 12 credits of undergrad Greek and 6 credits each of grad Greek and Hebrew, so 36 credits of the Biblical languages. Then there are syntax and translation courses, systematic theology, etc.

So, I don't appreciate it when people with no training in linguistics, other languages, or translation theory set themselves up as experts. These translators and translation students deserve great respect for the huge amount of training and work they are doing. The native translators they met in Mexico (not a single American) and their Mexican leaders also work very hard at translation, and have experience and knowledge. They deserve respect, too.

Sometimes on the BB I don't see that respect. If you are going to post on Bible translation here on the BB. If you don't have training or experience in this area, be humble and respectful.

P. S. About Miss B., she had to do a thesis for her MA in linguistics, she bounced stuff off me for that. Some of the stuff she was talking about was brand new to me. Brilliant lady!

 

By or through water.

 

Thank you for sharing God’s wonderful work through you, your students and school.

It is beyond arrogant to dismiss those who have dedicated their lives to biblical languages and translations, through intense peer reviewed study, and lift yourself up as expert of equal or greater degree.

I’ve had 4 classes each of Biblical Hebrew and Greek. Just enough to work my way through a lexicon for study purposes.

Even with my bare minimum credits, I know enough to clearly recognize the errors of some which almost always comes down to not understanding the context in which the word is used.

Thanks for sharing JoJ.

peace to you

 

I appreciate your kind words. I'll share a little more.

A. is a young man who graduated with our MA in Bible Translation. He is currently on deputation to raise support for working with the Madi tribe in Africa. He has already been there several extended periods to help the native translators as a translation consultant, and that will be his role after he has raised support. He will continue to teach them Greek and Hebrew so that they can get their translation to be correct. He will also be doing evangelism, and hopefully get a church planting movement started.

M. is another graduate of the program. He is a Persian who got saved while working in Australia. God led him to our seminary and to a wonderful wife who graduated from our college. They have three beautiful kids, including a set of twins. He has a burden to translate the OT into Farsi, the language of his country, to fit together with a NT already published in Farsi. He takes trips into Muslim countries to evangelize and start churches--a dangerous task--and reaches into Farsi speaking countries on Internet TV and radio, and even has his own Bible institute to train his converts in those countries. All in all, he is a wonderful servant of Christ!

Alas, Miss E., another of our graduates, got married rather than become a translator, and now is a sweet husband and mother. We forgive her!

 

These stories illustrates a recent development in Bible translation. In many cases nowadays, the translation team consists all of nationals, even the leadership. The missionary is then the trainer and the translation consultant. The team is thus able to do a better job than a missionary translator, being native speakers of their heart language. They must know more than one language, have definite linguistic ability, and be trained. Any one of these native translators could post expertly here on the BB about translation theory!

Years ago I flew to Africa and taught translation theory to a group of African men, who are now working on a translation in Cameroon Pidgin. This will be very useful to the radio ministry that exists there, since there is no Scripture at all in that language.

 

[QUOTE="Van, post: 2876350, member: 10696]

The premise that folks holding college degrees do not make mistakes obvious to diligent students of the Word is false.
[/QUOTE]
Well, that was awkward.

 

Looking back through Van's posts I see that he is conflating ambiguities in the original language with ambiguous renderings. (Okay, I peeked at Van's posts though I have him on ignore. So sue me! But I certainly have no desire to interact with his insulting self, so there. )

My reply in Post #5 to Rob's Post #2 was about preserving ambiguities in the original text (which Van does not read), rather than translating a clear original word with an ambiguity. And various of Van's illustrations of renderings are not even ambiguous!

At any rate, there are two very different issues at hand her: preserving ambiguities in the source text, and producing ambiguities in the target language from clear phrasing in the original, such as in 1 Peter 3:20, which is not ambiguous in the original. The meaning of the preposition δια should be taken as causal--problem solved!

Humph. Amateur. (It's not an insult to call Van an amateur, though he is going to take it that way and insult me again. It's simply a fact.)

 

I want the Bible I study from to be as close to the original language as I can tolerate, if there are ambiguities in the text, I want to know they are there.

It is dangerous to try and make clear what is ambiguous in the Bible.

The things that are clearly written, we can be sure of.
Things that are less clearly written, we should have a more relaxed posture towards.

It is dangerous to hold an opinion of Scripture based upon our preconceived notions. We need to critically examine the positions we hold and realize that we may hold an opinion that is not as solidly based as we think.

We can be brothers and sisters in Christ despite our disagreements.

Rob