Dave G
Well-Known Member
I agree.You see my view and I see yours, and we totally disagree.
Nothing we can do, Dave G.
I wish you well, Charlie, and thank you for your time and for indulging my curiosity.
May God bless you sir.
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
I agree.You see my view and I see yours, and we totally disagree.
Nothing we can do, Dave G.
I agree.
I wish you well, Charlie, and thank you for your time and for indulging my curiosity.
May God bless you sir.
Replying from some posts that I saw earlier.hopefully people read, I saw the other person was asking from someone to give another view. so I did
Replying from some posts that I saw earlier.
I was asking Charlie, EG.
That said, going back and reading through your posts ( which I did far too quickly the first time ), I see that I've made a serious mistake and classified them as "summaries"...
Which they are not.
I therefore ask your personal forgiveness and will endeavor to slow down and read more carefully in the future.
Even though I do not agree with your explanation of the passage, I do acknowledge that you have made an effort at thoroughly trying to make someone who may end up disagreeing with you, see how you've come to understand it for yourself.
May God bless you, as well.
22 Paul now brings the "longsuffering" of God in the picture.
By the fact of existing "vessels of dishonor" God has the right to show His wrath toward disobedient man. But yet, He endures with much longsuffering these "vessels of dishonor."
This is just the opposite of TULIP! If these "vessels of dishonor" are fitted for destruction, what is the point of God's longsuffering with them? The longsuffering of God is actually the mercy of God extended to rebellious man for an unknown period of time. A period of time of His choosing through His foreknowledge.
1 Peter 1:2 KJV
"Elect according to the foreknowledge of God the Father, through sanctification of the Spirit, unto obedience and sprinkling of the blood of Jesus Christ: Grace unto you, and peace, be multiplied."
Whether we like it or not, agree or not, the Elect are chosen by the foreknowledge of God. Also through His foreknowledge He strives with much longsuffering the "vessels of dishonor" showing them His mercy that will be shown to them at the Judgment.
23 "And that He might make known the riches of His Glory on the vessels of mercy."
God bears with much longsuffering with the "vessels of dishonor" AND He also will make known the riches of His glory to the "vessels of mercy."
"which He had afore prepared unto glory" God chooses His elect through His foreknowledge, knowing beforehand they will believe. He predestined before the foundation of the world these "to be conformed into the image of Christ" through His plan of redemption.
Ongoing??
All you have to do is say, "I don't believe the Bible."Romans 9 in the context of TULIP
All you have to do is say, "I don't believe the Bible."
It'd save a lot of writing for you.
OK, Charlie, I'll take a look at it and address things similar to what I did in my previous posts.Out of respect for your previous request to continue in Rom. 9, I've decided to do so, only for you to understand my point of view. I think it very important, actually a necessity that we understand one another's view.
Participating in forums or reading my posts. Mine are not for everybody, that's why I quote from other men a lot. They have a fine feature on this forum, where if you click on my image to the left, you should be able to see a button called "Ignore". Click that, and may God restore you to fine health, more than can be expected.Including participating on the forums. I know it's just a matter of time for me.
I didn't say I wasn't praying for you.That's not nice, Alan, that is the precise type attitude that brings on my fidgety condition that continuously afflicts me.
I've discussed it many times with my doctor and they give me medication, but to no avail.
I suppose I will eventually have to separate myself from the sources that bring on this effect.
Including participating on the forums. I know it's just a matter of time for me.
unconditional election
"God is Sovereign:"God by His sovereign will
God Elects [i.e. Chooses, Predestines, Foreordains] Individuals to salvation.God by His sovereign will chooses who will be saved
God Elects [i.e. Chooses, Predestines, Foreordains] Individuals to Condemnation.man does not have a choice in the matter.
God's Motivation in Election is to Show His Foreknowledge:God in His foreknowledge
"Election is not a controversy with a man who is, in some respect, a serious Bible student, for he would just have to out and out deny the Bible if he denies the Bible Doctrine of Election."they must be saved by the faith of Abraham and Isaac
WHAT THE BIBLE SAYS ABOUT THE DOCTRINES OF GRACE.TULIP
God in His foreknowledge looks into the future and determines His elect by free will faith.
They are not saved by Abraham's covenant, they must be saved by the faith of Abraham and Isaac.
Paul is not speaking of an unconditional election, but the election standing by His foreknowledge of faith.
God chose Jacob as the birthright through His foreknowledge knowing Jacob would choose to believe and be saved by faith.
The purpose would be that Christ would be born into this world through the seed of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob by an election of faith.
Only by faith is Israel the children of God.
Paul is not speaking of an unconditional election, but the election standing by His foreknowledge of faith.
God chose Jacob as the birthright through His foreknowledge knowing Jacob would choose to believe and be saved by faith.
The purpose would be that Christ would be born into this world through the seed of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob by an election of faith.
An Elect Remnant, gathered from an Elect Nation,Only by faith is Israel the children of God.
(2) That the Gentiles were not Substituted for Jews is evident from-Uh-oh, yet another contradiction added to the many I posted yesterday. It's a never ending cycle of contradictions. But that is no obstacle for the TULIP dreamer, they just ignore it, it just isn't there.
"(3) That there is an individual Election of Gentiles as well as of Jews to Eternal Life is evident from-So they ignore plain Scripture and say, hey let's go to Romans 9. Here they have a sure-fire fact of unconditional election, or so they think.