allow them to harmonize together
ROFL, @Silverhair has ZILCH interest in harmonizing scripture, he's on a mission to stamp out 'Calvinism' and somehow thinks his railing claptrap is going to get the job done.
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
allow them to harmonize together
ROFL, @Silverhair has ZILCH interest in harmonizing scripture, he's on a mission to stamp out 'Calvinism' and somehow thinks his railing claptrap is going to get the job done.
It's easy to tell when someone is effectively driving the hammer home, K gets involved.
Lol, so why are you getting involved? Because 'I drove the hammer home'?
God know who will freely trust in Him is not the same as your idea that He has determined who will be able to trust in Him.If God was aware of this before anyone came into existence, then that must be the sole outcome for them. Following that logic, there is no possibility to somehow artificially introduce free will into the equation.
None of the verse even come close to supporting your unconditiuonal election.Mark 13:20, Philippians 1:29, Acts 13:48, Romans 8:29, Ephesians 1:4, Revelation 13:8, Ephesians 1:4, John 6:44, 2 Timothy 1:9, Colossians 3:12, 1 Peter 2:9...
I am not saying Clement did not speak for himself I am saying what he said does not help your case. It does not support your theory that God picked out a select group for salvation rather it just tells us that God knows all that will be saved through faith in Him.If that's how you see it, then so be it, but I'm completely at ease with allowing Clement to speak for himself.
You said that the "all" equaled the elect. Care to show how that works out from the context?Actually, I'm just letting the "all" be defined by the group that is contextually in view.
Synergism would require that the person works with God to save himself but we do not see that in scripture. What we do see is man responds to God with faith and as you know faith is not a work so no synergism there Tea.It is because I understand Dog/TULIP as well as I do that I can see easily identify the flaws in synergism.
Odd you would say that when you haveWhat Calvinist/Reformed theology actually understands is that nobody would ever take God up on the good faith offer of salvation by default.
Actually according to the C/R view if you are not part of the select group it has been determined that you will reject God. There is no free will in the C/R view.According to C/R, if you are not part of this select group, then God has chosen to allow you to freely continue in your rebellion.
The C/R view shows that all who reject God do so because God has determined that they do so. Or do you think ma can overrule the determinations of God?Individuals who refuse to believe in Christ are already condemned, which gives Him the right to utilize a vessel of wrath for His good intentions, purposes, and glory.
How can it be. Remember your C/R theory touts divine determinism. He has to determine all things not just some things or He is not sovereign. That not a biblical view but it is calvinism.Of course it is. Those who are not chosen will naturally react negatively to the Gospel, just as they always have. In contrast, those who are chosen will respond positively to the Gospel because God has empowered them to do so.
Since God desires that all come to repentance then why does He not instill that desire in all? He could have intervened in all their lives so why did He condemn them from the start? You have some serious logical problems in your theory.The natural man will only ever deny the chance to know God. Everyone stands on equal footing, unless God intervenes to transform their nature, instilling a desire for fellowship with Him.
But the president is not God. God could have force all people to come to Him just as you say He forced the C/R's to come to Him. Actually just deciding to save a few when He could have saved all makes your version God seem rather cruel. Why condemn people to an eternity in hell when they had not even sinned.After the fall, God had every right to condemn all of humanity for eternity. However, He decided to save a few.
It's quite similar to how a President can grant pardons to offenders. If a pardon is given to a criminal who is equally guilty as others who do not receive pardons, does that mean the President is a bad person?
Of course we see things differently. I have looked at the DoG/TULIP and see it for what it is. You look at it and see it for what you would like it to be.Obviously, we see things differently. You do you, and I'll do me.
ROFL, @Silverhair has ZILCH interest in harmonizing scripture, he's on a mission to stamp out 'Calvinism' and somehow thinks his railing claptrap is going to get the job done.
The calvinist view that God picks so many and no more
| ...is there unrighteousness with God?... |
| ...he hath mercy on whom he will, and whom he will be hardeneth.... |
OH NO!
Romans Chapter 9
...is there unrighteousness with God?...
Your CDS infected brains just can't accept this, you must deny the truth of it:
Romans Chapter 9
...he hath mercy on whom he will, and whom he will be hardeneth....
Men perish because they love sin and hate the true God. Do not blame God for mans sin and rebellion. Hey Sh, how much error did you find in the Joel Beeke messages???KY you are letting your obsession cloud your mind.
What does your silly post have to do with what I had written? Here is the full text which just shows how desperate you are. You do not have a good answer do you?
"The calvinist view that God picks so many and no more means that He also reprobates all the others. They are condemned through no fault of their own but just because God did not pick them.
That is the difference between man being responsible for rejecting Him and God being responsible for man rejecting Him."
Men perish because they love sin and hate the true God. Do not blame God for mans sin and rebellion. Hey Sh, how much error did you find in the Joel Beeke messages???
And once again, a Calvinist says a verse does not mean what it says, because it does not fit with Calvinist doctrine. Food for thought...
Show where at the white throne judgment unconditional election is blamed for why a sinner did not repent.Z it is the determinism of calvinism that lays that charge on God.
As often as the read and understand theoir bibles in Eph1, 2 tim 1:9 ,or Rom8& 9How many times has a calvinist said that all the elect were chosen B4 creation?
Yes, a great number , that cannot be diminished or increased. It is perfect Because God is perfect in His knowledge and eternal purpose. He cannot save one more person, or one less person that he has elected!The calvinist view that God picks so many
Those who love and remain in their sin are reprobated ,yes for sure, to the praise of His glorious justiceand no more means that He also reprobates all the others.
They are condemned first By Adam's sin, then doubly condemned by a lifetime of sin and rebellion against God. They are totally at fault, and responsable to repent and believe the gospel Command.They are condemned through no fault of their own
No, as free moral agents who are bound by sin ,they are commanded to repent and believe, but they have no desire to do that. Do not blame God for their sin. As free moral agents they choose sin, and to create their own god, rather than trust and obey, the true and living God.but just because God did not pick them.
I offer simple bible truth that you shield yourself from and remain in rebellion to revealed truth.That is simple logic Z.
Not,quite the contrary,Calvinism declares the truth that all died Spiritually In Adam,,and are totally depraved. Your ignorance of these truths keeps you in rebellion to the scripture, that you profess that you believe???...So you are an unbelieving believerI do not blame God for man's sins, your calvinism does that Z.

And you cannot even find one in six messages?? let's be honest, you do not even listen, because you prefer to remain ignorant of Divine truth, rather than attempt to back up your foolish posting as if a person like Joel Beeke, has nothing to offer. Joel Beeke is only one of hundreds that would help someone like you to not remain ignorant, but you are a free moral agent, and can freely choose to remain in ignorance, and bound by your sin nature! The Apostles were not for ignorance;Any messages that support Beeke's false calvinist views would be error as those views and the bible can not be reconciled.



Once again, a false claim. The Greek word is "tasso" and it means "an appointment made by mutual agreement.Yes, I suppose that would be very much like how some on here jump through hoops in claiming that Acts 13:48 doesn’t really say “appointed.”
The Christian attitude should be to hasten for the day of Christ’s return, but that in no way does that imply that time has to be flexible. Otherwise, the Father would not know the day and the hour as He has promised.
"CDS?". Meaning?. . . CDS nuts . . . .
The Greek word is "tasso" and it means "an appointment made by mutual agreement.
There no need to not accept the plain meaning of the verse, except to revise it to fit previously accepted dogma.
Show where at the white throne judgment unconditional election is blamed for why a sinner did not repent.
As often as the read and understand theoir bibles in Eph1, 2 tim 1:9 ,or Rom8& 9
Yes, a great number , that cannot be diminished or increased. It is perfect Because God is perfect in His knowledge and eternal purpose. He cannot save one more person, or one less person that he has elected!
Those who love and remain in their sin are reprobated ,yes for sure, to the praise of His glorious justice
They are condemned first By Adam's sin, then doubly condemned by a lifetime of sin and rebellion against God. They are totally at fault, and responsable to repent and believe the gospel Command.
No, as free moral agents who are bound by sin ,they are commanded to repent and believe, but they have no desire to do that. Do not blame God for their sin. As free moral agents they choose sin, and to create their own god, rather than trust and obey, the true and living God.
I offer simple bible truth that you shield yourself from and remain in rebellion to revealed truth.
Not,quite the contrary,Calvinism declares the truth that all died Spiritually In Adam,,and are totally depraved. Your ignorance of these truths keeps you in rebellion to the scripture, that you profess that you believe???...So you are an unbelieving believer
And you cannot even find one in six messages?? let's be honest, you do not even listen, because you prefer to remain ignorant of Divine truth, rather than attempt to back up your foolish posting as if a person like Joel Beeke, has nothing to offer. Joel Beeke is only one of hundreds that would help someone like you to not remain ignorant, but you are a free moral agent, and can freely choose to remain in ignorance, and bound by your sin nature! The Apostles were not for ignorance;
13 But I would not have you to be ignorant, brethren,
![]()
Is God allowed to run salvation then as He so chooses? Can He decide who are the elect or not?KY you never fail to make me laugh.
I do not have to stamp out Calvinism I just have to keep pointing out it's errors.
It will do it to itself as people come to see it for what it really is. A false theology based on pagan philosophy from the 4th century.
Ephesians 1:4 is NOT about the election. But God's choice of His elect before the foundation of the world. . . . εξελεξατο . . . . Related, but not the election which takes place in time.Ephesians 1:4 (ESV)
Even as he chose us in him before the foundation of the world, that we should be holy and blameless before him.
Tasso means an arrangement by mutual consent. It does not matter whether in the middle or passive voice. If in the passive voice, that means the person or people receive benefit from the action.Tasso is a perfect passive, which means the appointment came from someone other than the appointee.
As I said, some on here have to jump through hoops in order to arrive at their conclusions.