• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

"ordained to eternal life" - retrospective anachronistic nuance

Brightfame52

Well-Known Member
And yours @Brightfame52 is called ignoring context.
Silverhair,

You claim I am ignoring the context. Empty assertions are easy to type, but let’s look at the actual context of Acts 13. I challenge you to show us exactly what context I am ignoring.

1. The Context of Contrast (Verse 46 vs. Verse 48)

The immediate context is a stark contrast between two groups of people under the preaching of the same Gospel message:

  • The Unbelieving Jews (v. 46): Paul says they "judge yourselves [krinete heautous] unworthy of everlasting life." Luke uses an active verb with a reflexive pronoun. They did something to themselves.
  • The Believing Gentiles (v. 48): Luke completely drops that structure. He says, "as many as were appointed [ēsan tetagmenoi] to eternal life believed."
The context shows the reprobate judging themselves, while the elect are appointed by God. By trying to force Van's "mutual agreement" theory onto verse 48, you and Van are the ones ignoring the immediate contextual contrast that Luke deliberately set up.

2. The Context of the Sovereign Actor

Look at the broader context of the entire chapter. Who initializes every single saving action in Acts 13?

  • Verse 17: "The God of this people Israel chose our fathers..."
  • Verse 22: "He raised up David to be their king..."
  • Verse 23: "Of this man's offspring God has brought to Israel a Savior..."
  • Verse 48: "They began rejoicing and glorifying the word of the Lord; and as many as were appointed to eternal life believed."
The context of Acts 13 is a continuous demonstration of top-down, unilateral divine authority. God chooses, God raises up, God brings the Savior, and God appoints to eternal life.

The Five-Phase Context

Silverhair, the context aligns perfectly with the Five Phases of Salvation:

  1. The Eternal Phase (Election): God authoritatively stationed and appointed a people unto eternal life (ēsan tetagmenoi is pluperfect—it was already a completed reality in God's eternal decree before they heard the message).
  2. The Practical Phase (Conversion): Consequently, in time, when those appointed individuals heard the Gospel, they rejoiced and executed faith (episteusan).
The appointment is the root; the faith is the fruit.

If you think I've missed the context, don't just throw out a one-line zinger. Step up to the plate: Show us the verse in this context that says the Gentiles appointed themselves, or admit that the text flatly attributes the appointment to God alone.
 

Kai

Active Member
Let’s look strictly at what the grammar and syntax of Acts 13:48 itself demands. Even without an explicit hypo + genitive ("by God") in the immediate clause, the text of Acts 13:48 completely eliminates your middle-voice "self-disposition" theory.

Concerning the Greek, can you identify where the agent (genitive or dative noun) is in the passage?

I'm not proposing that it should be rendered as "disposed themselves to eternal life," nor am I claiming that anyone arranges their own appointment. You've shared an interpretation that aligns with numerous Greek scholars, and I genuinely respect the credibility of their scholarship. However, there's equally solid scholarly work supporting alternative viewpoints. I'd argue that Acts 13:48 contains enough ambiguity to make it unsuitable as the foundation for doctrine, which is why we should turn to other biblical passages to understand how someone embraces their appointment.

I'd like to suggest examining how the Holy Spirit convicts sinners (John 16:8-10). This perspective shifts everything. Once someone acknowledges that the Holy Spirit convicts of sin, they must then determine how deeply that conviction applies. John's point was that this applies to "the world."
 
Last edited:

Silverhair

Well-Known Member
The context shows the reprobate judging themselves, while the elect are appointed by God.

No one is one of the elect until they have believed in Christ. It seems you have them saved before they believe BF.

Look at the verse in question BF.

When the Gentiles heard this, they rejoiced and glorified the word of the Lord,

At this point they were already believers in the God of the gospel that Paul and Barnabas had been preaching.

Man does not save himself but God only saves those that believe which is what we see in the context Act 13:39-48

38 Therefore let it be known to you, brothers, that through Jesus the forgiveness of sins is proclaimed to you.
39 Through Him everyone who believes is justified...
42 ...the people urged them to continue this message on the next Sabbath.
43 ...many of the Jews and devout converts to Judaism followed Paul and Barnabas, who spoke to them and urged them to continue in the grace of God.
44 ...nearly the whole city gathered to hear the word of the Lord.
45 ...the Jews saw the crowds, they were filled with jealousy, and they blasphemously contradicted what Paul was saying.
46 ...“It was necessary to speak the word of God to you first. But since you reject it and do not consider yourselves worthy of eternal life, we now turn to the Gentiles.
47 ...‘I have made you a light for the Gentiles, to bring salvation to the ends of the earth
48 When the Gentiles heard this, they rejoiced and glorified the word of the Lord, and all who were appointed for eternal life believed.

What we see here is that God saved those that believed, He does not save them so that they will then believe as you seem to think.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Kai

LaGrange

Active Member
LaGrange, your explanation raises six issues that need to be answered from Scripture.

1. Is faith an effect of regeneration or hearing the Word?


Both hearing and regeneration matter, but they are not competing causes. God uses His Word, while the Spirit gives life (Rom. 10:17; John 6:63; Eph. 2:1, 5). Hearing does not establish that the spiritually dead sinner independently produces saving faith.

My Comment: Is Hearing the Word the instrumental cause? Is regeneration the efficient cause? I ask because you said regeneration and Hearing the word are not competing causes. We would say Hearing the Word as in Rom 10:17, [which Protestantism would interpret as Hearing (preaching affecting the heart) or reading scripture], is out of place. When you say “the Spirit gives life”, I think you are saying regeneration causes Faith which would be correct. Faith comes out of grace. Faith is not the first grace. Really, to is, Faith is an effect and not a cause of justification at all. So when you receive this Faith, what are you supposed to do with it? If we are saved by grace, why do we need Faith?


2. Does Acts 13:48 teach your preparation process?

Luke says, “as many as were ordained to eternal life believed.” The perfect passive participle tetagmenoi describes them as appointed to eternal life. The grammar alone does not prove every detail of regeneration’s timing, but the verse never mentions a resistible preparatory period, baptismal regeneration, or cooperative grace as the explanation for their believing.

My Comment: Preparation continues after Full Regeneration (born again) in the sanctification period. This is Preparation for Glorification. After we are born again, we are born into the family of God and receive our inheritance = eternal life (Rom 6:23, Gal 6:8). Eternal life, as in Acts 13:48. We must continue to prepare the rest of our lives for glorification because, although we will always be a member of the family once we are born again, through sin, we can lose our inheritance . We are called to holiness or sanctity.

3. Are all calls identical?

No. The Gospel is proclaimed outwardly, but Romans 8:30 connects God’s saving call with justification and glorification. Christ says, “All that the Father giveth me shall come to me” (John 6:37). You cannot erase the distinction between an invitation that may be rejected and God’s saving work by simply calling both “the same call.”

My Comment: John 6:37 All that the Father giveth to me shall come to me: and him that cometh to me, I will not cast out.
The idea is that you have to keep coming. Think about the last part of the verse. Election is conditional. It’s conditional to God’s preparation of us. If we do not resist, God will complete His preparation in us. Once we are prepared, He elects us to justification (Baptism). Here’s how to interpret John 6:37:
1. God the Father calls all men (election to initial calling for preparation) (external grace and internal - sufficient grace)
2. Gods the Father calls all men that He prepared to believe (election to justification)(internal grace - efficacious grace)
3. God the Father calls all men that are justified to persevere [glorification - sanctification (live a holy life) - part of the election to justification] (internal grace - sufficient and efficacious grace]
So it’s the same thing here as in Acts 13:48. The message is that God continues calling which means He continues preparing us.

4. Does God continue calling believers?

Yes. God continues to instruct, correct, and exhort His people. But ongoing calls to obedience do not establish that the initial saving call is merely an opportunity awaiting an independently supplied response. God works in believers “both to will and to do” (Phil. 2:13).

My Comment: Rather than God waiting on us during the initial Calling period before justification (full regeneration), God is doing the preparing. We’re doing either the obeying (hearing) or resisting. In Calvinism, why does God wait so long to give the effectual call?

Phil 2:13 comes in at the point of full regeneration and continues during the sanctification period, but not before the effectual call. You’re saying that rather than working with us, God is doing it alone. Let me say this: at the point of the effectual call, if God is doing it all by Himself (work of God), then God is believing and trusting in Himself. God is converting Himself. Of course, this is incorrect. Something has to originate in man. Man has to move himself.

Here’s an analogy to picture this: think of a moving walkway at the airport. The moving walkway is God’s Grace designed to move us. The end we are moving towards is God Himself and the starting point is sin. The analogy is not perfect so you have to also imagine that you have to walk too. The walkway is designed for you to walk. You get where you are going faster that way. So God is moving you while you are moving yourself.This is cooperative grace. You are moving towards God and away from sin.

Phil 2:12-13 says “Wherefore, my dearly beloved, (as YOU have always obeyed, not as in my presence only but much more now in my absence) with fear and trembling work out your salvation. For it is God who worketh in you, both to will and to accomplish, according to his good will.”

Our interpretation of Phil 2:13 is that this shows cooperative grace. It occurs during and after justification (full regeneration). Phil 2:13 is talking about the sanctification period so this is about perseverance. Notice: in Phil 2:12 Paul says “YOU….obeyed”. This means YOU are doing something and not just God. This YOU is working and God is working. God’s Grace inables us to work [Faith that worketh through Charity (Gal 5:6)]. We receive Hope and Charity at the effectual call too. Also it says “with fear and trembling work out YOUR salvation”. YOUR salvation, not God’s salvation. THEN it says “For it is God who worketh in you, both to will and to accomplish….” Paul is encouraging the Philippians to persevere and is comforting them by telling them that God is working with and in them.

5. Is grace present during sanctification?

Absolutely. The question is whether grace merely assists an independently decisive human contribution or produces the believer’s willing response. Scripture says God “granted repentance unto life” (Acts 11:18). The sinner genuinely believes and repents, but those responses do not complete Christ’s unfinished work.

My Comment: If the sinner genuinely believes and repents, is he doing that apart from God’s Grace? Christ’s finished work enables the sinner to believe and repent but the sinner is the one who has to DO the believing and repenting and he can’t do that if the whole process is the work of God alone. Something has to originate in man.

6. Does 1 Samuel 7:3 prove prevenient grace and baptismal regeneration?

No. “Prepare your hearts unto the LORD” is a command, not an explanation of how regeneration occurs. A command establishes what people ought to do; it does not prove that fallen sinners possess independent spiritual ability or that baptism causes regeneration.

My Comment: Aquinas says Grace precedes the Law. I know you don’t think so but it does. Basically you are saying you don’t have to keep the law. We say you do. We are saying you are able to keep the law with God’s Grace (by the way, this doesn’t mean you never sin). Grace is the key here. The Jews were saying all you had to do was keep the law and you didn’t have to have faith (grace). Paul was saying you had to have faith and keep the law (Rom 3:31). Aquinas calls the gospel the “law of the gospel”. He probably said that when he was commenting on Rom 7 and other places.
 

LaGrange

Active Member
Continued from post #65

LaGrange, you have presented a theological sequence involving preparation, baptism, and cooperative grace. Where does Scripture explicitly establish that sequence?

I affirm the necessity of faith, repentance, baptism, and obedience according to Scripture. I deny that these responses independently cause or complete God’s saving work.

My Comment: the sequence is Calling and Justification and Glorification. Rom 8:30: “And whom he predestinated, them he also called. And whom he called, them he also justified. And whom he justified, them he also glorified.” There is one kind of calling and it is ongoing. Cooperative grace takes place under Justification at baptism. Brightflame, all of this can get very complicated. Believe me, the great Schoolmen already had this worked out. It started out with the authority of the apostles and their successors and the exegesis of scripture.

The term “preparation” is biblically-based as shown in Matt 3:3 “Prepare ye the way of the Lord…” You can see the steps right there in Matt 3. It’s all before baptism. Preparation is the effect of this calling. Where does it say “Effectual Call” or “Common Call” in scripture?

In hermeneutics, there are other ways of interpreting scripture other than the literal. Once we have interpreted the literal and we have interpreted all of scripture, then we can reason our understanding of these verses. We form deeper understandings of God by combining the understanding of verses. This is not Eisegesis because we are using scripture that has been exegeted but we are also using our reason. We all do it! It’s natural. Over time, the church integrated the exegesis of scripture of the early church fathers into our understanding. Aquinas calls this synthesis. Also, there is a way of interpreting scripture called the “Analogical Method”. I’ve seen it said like this: “Be attentive to the analogy of faith. By “analogy of faith” we mean the coherence of the truths of faith among themselves and within the whole plan of Revelation. (90)” (Catechism of the Catholic Church, 114) This means we interpret scripture in a way that fits the coherence of the truths of the faith and the whole plan of Revelation. Examples of things that would fall under that Analogical method of interpretation: the use of new terminology such as “effectual call”. Where is that term in scripture? It isn’t. According to your doctrine, it is based in scripture that has been exegeted. Ideas are developed the same way. Over time, we also develop new terms or logical sequences of things (reason) because of Heresies or other disagreements that come up. I see so many things in scripture using this method.
 
Top