Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
If you realize this much, then why not stick to the topic at hand.Originally posted by eschatologist:
andy
You started this thread concerning Church of Christ doctrine and its association with baptism.
No, as you stated above this is not the real question. This is not what andy was asking about. If you want to argue about baptismal regeneration ( a well known heresy) then start another thread. Here again is Andy's quote. Please read it carefully.So the real question should be asked: If you knowingly disobey the Lord will you be saved.
I was not starting a thread on baptismal regeneration. I was simply pointing out that the Church Of Christ DENOMINATION teaches that you have to be baptized in THEIR DENOMINATION to go to Heaven.
This isn't even true, is it?Originally posted by BobRyan:
While the RCC will let other Christians go to purgatory and then heaven - they claim that only Catholics can be saved under the "New Covenant".
You are way more intimate with their catechism than me. But the catholics who post here keep saying over and over that all sort of non-catholic folks can be saved. You keep misquoting them and twisting what they say, so I just assumed that you were making stuff up just in this thread too.Originally posted by BobRyan:
Harley!
Are you saying you "know something" about the RCC definition of the "New Covenant"? I think I detect that you are about to say something here.
Please go ahead.
In Christ,
Bob
In the "details" of my post above - I state that they do allow non-Catholics into heaven - but NOT by the New Covenant. (And as all non-Catholics know - the New Covenant is the only Covenant God has made with man for that points to forgiveness and heaven)Originally posted by Harley4Him:
But the catholics who post here keep saying over and over that all sort of non-catholic folks can be saved.
Fine "attack" - can you quote me actually doing that? Or are you still looking for something that will hold up?Harley --
You keep misquoting them and twisting what they say, so I just assumed that you were making stuff up just in this thread too.
That is an interesting game you play...Harley said --
I notice that you neglected to post something that actually proves that what you are saying is true. Instead, it's just the same old game of twister ... left foot red, turn off your head.
EWTN - Church historian - Dr. Carroll
My Question to Dr. Carroll
My question is whether there are any EX CATHEDRA statements on the New Covenant and the fact that it can only apply to Catholics. (And as I say, Protestants view that as the same as salvation today).
Dr Carroll replies-
It seems like an insurmountable problem. If addressed in the interfaith dialogs of recent years, I have not heard of it's resolution.
Historically the position seems to have been even stronger - as it came from Popes and councils on the subject of salvation outside the Catholic church.
According to the Cahtolic teaching on Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus ("outside the church there is no salvation") "heretics" (including Protestants and Eastern Orthodoxy as the term was applied historically by the Catholic church) cannot be saved (as the original papal decrees imply)
Pope Boniface VIII taught in his Unam Sanctam decree
>>>>> Therefore, this one and single Church has one head and not two heads,- for had she two heads, she would be a monster,- that is, Christ and Christ's vicar, Peter and Peter's successor. For the Lord said unto Peter, "Feed my sheep." "My," he said, speaking generally and not particularly, "these and those," by which it is to be understood that all the sheep are committed unto him. So, when the Greeks [Eastern Orthodox] and others say that they were not committed to the care of Peter and his successors, they must confess that they are not of Christ's sheep, even as the Lord says in John, "There is one fold and one shepherd."...
Furthermore, that every human creature is subject to the Roman pontiff [the Pope],- this we declare, say, define, and pronounce to be altogether necessary to salvation. >>>>>
The Council of Florence taught: > [The most Holy Roman Church] firmly believes, professes, and proclaims that those not living within the Catholic Church, not only pagans, but also Jews and heretics and schismatics cannot become participants in eternal life, but will depart 'into everlasting fire which was prepared for the devil and his angels' (Matthew 25:41), unless before the end of life the same have been added to the flock; and that the unity of the ecclesiastical body is so strong that only to those remaining in it are the Sacraments of the Church of benefit for salvation, and do fastings, almsgiving, and other functions of piety and exercises of Christian service produce eternal reward, and that no one, whatever almsgiving he has practiced, even if he has shed blood for the name of Christ, can be saved, unless he has remained in the bosom and unity of the Catholic Church. >
The First Vatican Council taught:
> Hence we teach and declare that by the appointment of our Lord the Roman Church possesses a superiority of ordinary power over all other churches, and that this power of jurisdiction of the Roman Pontiff, which is truly episcopal, is immediate; to which all, of whatever right and dignity, both pastors and faithful, both individually and collectively, are bound, by their duty of hierarchial subordination and true obedience, to submit not only in matters which belong to faith and morals, but also in those which appertain to the discipline and government of the Church throughout the world, so that the Church of Christ may be one flock under one supreme pastor through the preservation of unity both of communion and of profession of the same faith with the Roman Pontiff. This is the teaching of Catholic truth, from which no one can deviate without loss of faith and salvation.
Answer by Warren H. Carroll, Ph.D on 08-30-2001:
The reference to the New Covenant does certainly refer to the Mass. Please read John 6, which Protestants seem to avoid "like the plague." When "Unam Sanctam" was issued, there were no Protestants, because the Protestant revolt had not yet happened
Which means what? That you are claiming that Catholics teach that only Catholics can go to heaven.Originally posted by BobRyan:
In the "details" of my post above - I state that they do allow non-Catholics into heaven - but NOT by the New Covenant. (And as all non-Catholics know - the New Covenant is the only Covenant God has made with man for that points to forgiveness and heaven
So, what is your main point here? Both get to heaven but we are cheapening yours by saying you get in some other way? Is this a fight over a term?In the "details" of my post above - I state that they do allow non-Catholics into heaven - but NOT by the New Covenant. (And as all non-Catholics know - the New Covenant is the only Covenant God has made with man for that points to forgiveness and heaven)
Yes, I have read history, and studied the Bible. I prefer what the Bible says over the what Catholic historians say. They seem somewhat biased. However there are two separate strands of history. There is throughout history those who have believed as the Bible teaches, and the Apostles taught, that salvation is by faith alone, in every generation since the Apostles. They are mostly (but not necessarily entirely) Baptistic in faith, though called by different names.Originally posted by Charles33:
DHK - Acts 2:38 like you didn't know that was coming...now the 'party line' please. DHK, you have read histoy, you know the Baptism Regeneration has been taught not only in the Bible explicitly, but also attested through all history. Baptism non-regeneration is a well known and now popular heresy.
The preaching of these rules and correct doctrinal positions shall be deemed and denoted as “preaching the truth”. As noted above, people who do not understand these rules (and thus fail to follow them perfectly) shall be deemed as not truly loving God nor the truth.
These rules shall be observed without variation of any kind. Anyone who fails to know and follow these rules perfectly is deemed to be lost eternally unless he/she repents. The grace of God shall not be thought to be extended for any misunderstanding or noncompliance.
In other words, salvation is by works.no other Christian (one who has believed and been baptized but does not subscribe to one or more of these rules) shall be considered as being a part of “the brotherhood”.
The answer is given very simply in Ephesians 2:8,9Then what is it that saves you, belief, confession, repentance, or all the above?! You quoted Jo.3:16 which says belief only! Then you also quote from Romans which says confession saves you. And I could throw several scripures that include baptism in the salvation equation. It also mentions that your faith has saved you, so does it or does it not include(faith) the above elements(belief/ confession/ repentance/ baptism), or is salvation something that is totally unseen by all, as your your definition posits?
Baptism is never associated with salvation except symbolically. It is a picture of a believer’s death to his old life of sin, and his resurrection to a new life in Christ. That is the teaching in Romans 6:3,4. It is the first step of obedience that a believer, one who already has been saved takes after salvation. Never in the Bible do we see an unsaved person being baptized. Never is it taught in the Bible that baptism is a part of salvation.Anyway why would you continue to insist on the others, yet over and over omit baptism? I believe it comes from the way you have been taught-- it does not fall into your frame of theology. I see in many of your posts how you aggresively comment on other doctrines and churches that you do not agree with, who may add to or omit certain essential elements of faith, yet it appears you yourself do it as well! I will be very interested to see your explaination and how you side-step around the passages like Acts 2:38; Mark 16:16; 1Pet.3:21 and others. Even more so I imagine it would be quite interesting to see your eschatalogical views of the bible. Maybe someone could label your views as "heretical!"
Bob said --
In the "details" of my post above - I state that they do allow non-Catholics into heaven - but NOT by the New Covenant. (And as all non-Catholics know - the New Covenant is the only Covenant God has made with man for that points to forgiveness and heaven)
Charles - most Christians know that the New Covenant IS the Gospel covenant by which mankind is saved. SO when the statement is made that non-Catholics "can not be saved under the New Covenant" (as well as "outside of the Church no salvation) - you can surely "see" how a non-Catholic might view that as "less than positive".Charles said --
So, what is your main point here? Both get to heaven but we are cheapening yours by saying you get in some other way? Is this a fight over a term?
In Christ,Catholic Digest. May 1994. Fr. Ken Ryan … page 124
I ask the lead question for the month of May---
“Your June 1993 issue had a most interesting question regarding the New Covenant. Your answer said that people come under the New Covenant by joining the Catholic Church and taking part in the Catholic Mass, but said nothing about there being any other ways of entering the New Covenant or about limiting salvation to those under the New Covenant. Are there (in Catholic thought) any other ways of salvation, and if there are, doesn’t that fact make the Catholic New Covenant (joining the Catholic church and attending Mass) unnecessary?” Bob.
The Answer – By Fr. Ken Ryan
“Not in Catholic theology. God is fair to everyone so He offers His salvation to everyone. THE invitation is issued through the New Covenant, and human acceptance of the invitation is properly expressed by membership in the Catholic Church And participation in Christ’s sacrifice of Himself in the Mass. The New Covenant, in its Catholic meaning, is the ordinary way of salvation (getting to heaven).
God’s expressed command is that everyone belong to the Catholic Church He founded. “He who hears Me” was spoken to the 70 disciples whom He had organized to speak for Him in places He did not personally visit.
The invitation to membership in the New Covenant is for all people in general, but the acceptance has to be by the individual. One certainly can’t decline an invitation he or she has never heard of. Accordingly, the Catholic Church does not deny the possibility of salvation except to those who have heard the invitation, understood its meaning, and nevertheless rejected it. Those who have never heard it, never understood it, or never made any deliberate rejection of the invitation can still be saved in some extraordinary way., some way other than joining the Catholic Church and participating in the Mass. All these possible ways can be summarized by saying that all persons who sincerely try to have a properly informed conscience and then follow that conscience in their moral actions can be saved by this extraordinary way God offers to all.
New Covenant as a term is much more prevalent in non-Catholic popular literature than it is in Catholic writings, and has various meanings. But it was Christ Himself who identified it with the Mass which non-Catholics have rejected. “This cup which is poured out for you is the new covenant in my blood” was spoken at the Last Supper (the first Mass).
So, according to Catholic thought the New Covenant is the ordinary way to heaven, commanded for our use by Christ, which nevertheless allows salvation by the extraordinary action of God.
Bob, you should start collecting all this stuff and publishing it. Judging by some of the Chick tract threads there seems to be a big market for this type of material.Originally posted by BobRyan:
Now the RCC does claim to "make up a way out of thin air" that they allow for non-Catholic salvation - as long as it is "not the Bible way - which is the New Covenant".