• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Search results

  1. Alan Dale Gross

    Should the Bible say "Lucifer" or "morning star" in Isaiah 14:12? A Plain, Straightforward Bible Treatment of "LUCIFER" in Isaiah 14:12.

    From "Answers To Your Bible Version Questions"© 2002 by David W. Daniels. "Question: Should the Bible say "Lucifer" or "morning star" in Isaiah 14:12? And does it refer to Satan? "Answer: The King James Bible is correct. Although "Lucifer" is the Latin version of the name, the passage is...
  2. Alan Dale Gross

    Was the Nkjv translated from same sorce texts as used by the 1611 translators for Kjv then?

    I have often wondered why you don't know anything about what you try to claim. Stop saying, "the NKJV was based on the same multiple original-language texts of Scripture as the KJV is". That is an incredibly uneducated thing to say. The New King James Version is not a true King James Bible...
  3. Alan Dale Gross

    Calvin denied Lucifer is Satan

    Yes, he does. The King of Babylon is the Interpretation about who, in actual time and space, is being addressed, the way the hearers of the Word would have understood it to mean, at that time. Then, with all the parallels which are reminiscent of Satan, we have the King as 'the antitype of the...
  4. Alan Dale Gross

    Was the Nkjv translated from same sorce texts as used by the 1611 translators for Kjv then?

    "In this review, we examine the original language texts of Scripture which the New King James uses for its translation, the alternate readings from the NestleAland/UBS critical Greek text and the Hodges-Farstad majority Greek text which it supplies in its footnotes, and the actual translation...
  5. Alan Dale Gross

    Was the Nkjv translated from same sorce texts as used by the 1611 translators for Kjv then?

    There is no dier need to suggest the KJV requires any additions or deletions, and in that sense it has been produced as a complete work of literature that is more perfect than is humanly possible. The idea that "the KJV" IS "ONE SINGLE PERFECT ENGLISH BIBLE" does need some qualification...
  6. Alan Dale Gross

    Was the Nkjv translated from same sorce texts as used by the 1611 translators for Kjv then?

    This has not proven to be the case, whatsoever. Non-issue. It's called, 'translating'. Dead-issue, since that day. You should really study it out and learn "The NKJV's NT is translated from an edition of the Greek Textus Receptus" is not something anyone needs to try and advance as if it is...
  7. Alan Dale Gross

    Was the Nkjv translated from same sorce texts as used by the 1611 translators for Kjv then?

    See: An Examination & Critique of The NEW KING JAMES VERSION. As we see above, the critical text is ill-advised and for all intents and purposes a compilation of the worst manuscripts known to Mankind. While Logos points out, there is a 'KJV' of the Bible which had terrible, known to be...
  8. Alan Dale Gross

    Reasons Why Professed Christians Fail To See or Grasp The Doctrines Of Grace

    In my mind and experience, a God-wrought intimate personal awareness of what it is to be a sinner is absent in every case of an individual being unable to see what is going on and has been since Eternity Past, as to How God Saves Souls. A soul must understand their undone, helpless, hopeless...
Top