Search results

I think about a lot of things. Why?

The mystery of the incarnation is also in the veil. The Tabernacle was made up to two rooms. The first room was called the 'tabernacle of the congregation', or the 'tent of meeting.' This was in front of the veil, and behind the door, which was of the same material and colors of the veil, but...

Be careful about reading into things. Which part of the Tabernacle represents 'humanity' in general? I was speaking about a very specific artifact of the Tabernacle. I'm actually looking at the picture. Which part of the picture are you looking at? (Verses and reference.) The work of the...

We all need to from time to time. @Van said: 2) We are NOT speaking exclusively of a "Day" but of how the Old Covenant models, illustrates and foreshadows the New Covenant. Well...we were speaking of a specific sacrifice, but each offering in the law has it's own lesson to teach about...

Candace Owens

Government money means Government control.

It's all about Zionism.

I do understand that you're quite illiterate in the law. To anyone reading at a third grade level, I'm clearly of speaking of the Day of Atonement. That's in Leviticus. It's clear you don't know that, because you confused Paul's summary of an unrelated, and unrepeated rite with the law of that...

Forgive me for thinking you were following the conversation and talking about the rites described in Leviticus. I should have known better.

Edited the post to repair the thought.

Iran posed and poses no threat to the U.S. And I don't believe all the Israeli propaganda either. Bombing another country at the behest of a foreign state because of a superstitious reading of Genesis 12:3 is a very wicked thing to do. I had high hopes in Trump's genuine 'America First'...

*sigh* If it will shut you up. Paul alluded to that event, recorded in Exodus, to draw a contrast between the type and the shadow. The New Covenant was sanctified with better blood than the copy was. That wasn't the day of atonement. I will talk about the day of atonement, and the individual...

That's not in Leviticus. Try to keep up.

Okay, 'the Jews' weren't being sprinkled. The priests, their robes, and the tabernacle and its furniture were being sprinkled, and lepers for cleansing. There was no sprinkling of the congregation on the day of atonement, or of the Israelite bringing the individual sin offering.

When was this, particularly?

This is the foolishness that has Trump convinced his assassination was thwarted so he ignore his own intelligence director and bomb Iran for Israel.

In the vast library of life, the truly wise are those who recognize the limits of their knowledge, while the unknowing often speak the loudest, unaware that silence can be the greatest teacher. In other words, you don't know what you're talking about, so be quiet and try to keep up. The thread...

Isaiah 45:4 KJV For Jacob my servant's sake, and Israel mine elect, I have even called thee by thy name: The Day of Atonement has meaning only in context of the whole law. Under that economy, every circumcised Jew, faithful or not, was the elect of God, and the high priest stood before God...

The occasions of the 'voice of harpers, and musicians, and of pipers, and trumpeters' are what's in view, not the machines themselves. There will be no more occasion of celebration or revelry or triumph. A miserable existence indeed.

If we're proceeding from the model of Redemption given at Sinai, which is really the subject of the thread, one must be circumcised before an offering can be made for him. It seems that God's sovereign choice does come first.