Search results

So you deny what Isaiah and peter were inspired to record down to us then?

They were probably arguing over which was the true Bible, 1611 or 1769?

Actually, peter and Isaiah stated to us not seek after God period, not when just sinning

Jesus told us not to murder, but that is not the same as killing in war, or in self defense

Think muslims who model after Muhammed directly want to kill off all of the Jews and us to for good measure

Same director also made once upon a time in the West, with henry Fonda and charles bronson

One can be a pacifist or a soldier, as God would have each one be faithful in their own convictions on this issue

All comes back down to the basic issues of how badly did the Fall affect us, and does God require us to do anything additional to receiving Jesus as Savior and Lord by faith alone at all? Where does that wrath of God towards we as sinners go though, as someone has to face our due condemnation...

That is the right attitude to have in this issue, as too many times we see both sides getting to the place of saying we have different Gods, different gospels etc, but its more that we have honest disagreement on these issues

My favorite western, and one of my favorite movies period, is the Searchers

You are neither a classical Arminian nor a Calvinist though

He was perhaps the greatest non inspired theologian who ever lived though

We calvinists woudl agree with you view on this form of Calvinism that you are reacting against, as we do not hold to that form either

So what do you hold to, as Calvinism makes perfect sense to those of us jere who hold to us now being found in Adam spiritually dead, and whose only hope would be via the Atonement provided for us thru and by ther Cross of Christ?

John the Baptist did not tell the Roman soldiers to walk off their posts and quit the army though

God chose to use soldiers to fight in Old Testament times though

The 1828 would give to kjvo users the meaning though ascribed to the english word they chose to use as of 1611

The Modern Version bibles were all translated by scholars who had to accept the Plenary inspiration of Scripture, accepts the essentials of the Faith, and they all were just as bright and smart as 1611 translators, and had access to far superior tools to use, such as lexicons, dictionaries, word...

WSe have the very word of God to us in the English translations now avaiable to us such as Nas/Esv/Nkjv/ Kjv

Changing due to recent advancements, as an ongoing attempt to get right back to the originals themselves, as who stated that the Kjv 1611 was to be the final say in English translations? The 1611 translators did not see it that way