• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Search results

  1. J

    Tradition

    Textus Receptus Only?
  2. J

    Members only Communion

    Many Baptist churches have requirements of be saved, no active sinning issues, water baptism, be a member yet Bible states palinly only requirements are be saved, and be not living in known unconfessed sinning
  3. J

    Is This really Lordship Salvation view then?

    Seems that most who advocate "free grace" theology are non Cals, while Cals affirm Lordship theology
  4. J

    Tradition

    That would especially towards KJVO
  5. J

    Is This really Lordship Salvation view then?

    Or as Peter stated to us, make your election and calling sure
  6. J

    Is This really Lordship Salvation view then?

    Would that be a common view in some Free Grace churches. a focusing on what "we can do?"
  7. J

    Are most Fundamental Baptists Churches KJVO then?

    Which supports the notion that KJVO folks must have either direct inspiration from the Holy Spirit unto the 1611 translators, or else derive d inspiration from their textual sources used by them
  8. J

    Are most Fundamental Baptists Churches KJVO then?

    The Niv /nas/Esv/Nlkv were all just as "inspired" as the 1611 Kjv was
  9. J

    Are most Fundamental Baptists Churches KJVO then?

    Very Important info on this by same Mark ward https://sharperiron.org/filing/43642 Gist of his interaction with Kjv only pastors was that only a minority of even them could correct understand the Kjv and what it was really teaching and saying, and if they were having big issues, what about the...
  10. J

    Is This really Lordship Salvation view then?

    Agreed, just think that we need to present to them a realistic view of how coming to Jesus will save them, will be giving them new lives, but also does not mean now walking on water all the time and way into heaven
  11. J

    John R. Rice and the KJV

    based upon that, he would have no doubt praised also the NKJV
  12. J

    John R. Rice and the KJV

    Could be that the New Covenant is that Covenant enlarged and expanded to include now both Jews and Gentiles in it
  13. J

    Do we Calvinists really in Fullest sense deny the Trinity then?

    So in the ultimate sense, the Godhead themselves placed Jesus upon that Cross for His glory and for our salvation?
  14. J

    May A Woman Pastor?

    Woudl not say heretical, but would say they are against the clear teaching of Scripture regarding Male headship and leadership
  15. J

    Is This really Lordship Salvation view then?

    Agreed, yet think better way to view this would be proper Free Grace understanding deals with being justified, while proper Lordship deals with now saved and now getting sanctified
  16. J

    Is This really Lordship Salvation view then?

    Just as I am is how God saves us, as we can offer to Him nothings that merits salvation, and while we must repent of our sinning, does not mean reach a sinless perfection state as extreme Lordship seems to want us to be getting to
  17. J

    John R. Rice and the KJV

    Its the New Covenant that saved sinners in either Old or New Testaments
  18. J

    May A Woman Pastor?

    How is it set up in your church the offices, as we have Pastors and Elders, and deacons are those involved in the "business" side of the church functioning and operating
  19. J

    John R. Rice and the KJV

    Sure, Dr. Rice, here are more questions ... : Rice, John R., 1895-1980 : Free Download, Borrow, and Streaming : Internet Archive Chapter 1, question 11 on if the Nasv is good translation
  20. J

    John R. Rice and the KJV

    Did find also a quote by him regarding the Nasv of the NT, as he commended it not to replace the Kjv, but as a worthwhile addition to use for personal and biblcal studies
Top