Search results

Yet another falsehood, the claim that the many seeking but not finding the narrow door were saved. Folks, stack up the false claims, at some point they will collapse like a house of cards. Those seeking the narrow door were not seeking God. The narrow door is not a spiritual thing. Those...

Calvinism extols open theism because God did not cause, directly or indirectly our sin.

Again we disagree. You are using your definition of omniscience instead of addressing the modern viewpoint. If everything is predestined, then nothing happens by chance. We cannot agree because I use chance to mean not predetermined and you use chance some other way. Ditto for...

Again, we disagree, Jesus becoming the means of reconciliation does not equate with being reconciled.

As I said, we disagree. You seem to deny that things happen by chance. I accept those scriptures.

Scripture is clear, God sets before people the choice of life or death, and begs us to choose life. Not the action of someone who knows we will choose death. If that were true, the verse would read, God sets before some life, and the rest death...

WE disagree. Your understanding of omniscience (God knows everything imaginable) differs from my understanding (Inherit omniscience where God can know everything, but only knows what He has chosen to know, and does not know what He has chosen not to know, such as some aspect of our forgiven sins.

Again, God is reconciling humanity, and has reconciled those who have received the reconciliation. To claim anyone was reconciled before they received the reconciliation is wrong. Individuals are reconciled when they receive the reconciliation when God transfers that individual spiritually...

The context is Paul spoke to new Christians the same way he spoke to men of flesh using spiritual milk.

More false charges, more running from scripture. I say, with scripture, angels were created before God formed the earth, possibly during the prior creation days. This view is claimed to an addition to scripture by the above poster. :)

1) Yes, the names of those saved, those Jesus was addressing, had been in the past written in heaven. Absolutely no support for before creation. 2) Yes, the Word, Logos, The Second Person of the Trinity, was chosen to be the Lamb of God, the Redeemer, Before creation. Not at issue. 3)...

The key to understanding the Democrat Party talking points is to view them as self confession. They have no king of kings, no crown of thorns, their god is atheism, and their crown is tyranny. They incite insurrection, then claim their opponents are the insurrectionists. And of course, Demonic...

For the umpteenth time, "none that seeks after God" does NOT mean "none that ever seeks after God." When people are sinning they are not seeking after God, thus none seek after God all the time or when sinning is the contextual scope of the phrase. Paul, under inspiration, repurposed this...

Rev 1:8 WEB 8 “I am the Alpha and the Omega,[a] ” says the Lord God,[b] “who is and who was and who is to come, the Almighty.” Footnotes 1:8 TR adds “the Beginning and the End” 1:8 TR omits “God” The NASB footnotes "is to come" with the better "is coming" because the verb is in the present...

Certainly, scripture does not preclude that possibility, but unless you can cite scripture which precludes angels being created before the earth's creation day, you are simply making an argument from silence.

Obviously scripture teaches all things are not predestined. Things happen by chance. In order for a choice to be a choice, alternate outcomes must be a reality. If only one outcome is possible, it reduces the meaning of choice to picking which of two doors that access the same room. :)

We we can agree on this, Jesus sacrificing His life on the cross provided the means of reconciling the whole of humanity to Himself.

On and on, this poster posts non-germane nonsense. The many seeking the narrow door is now falsely claimed to not be seeking after God. I kid you not.

I am sure there is a distinction there that I am missing, but the key distinction is Jesus was not made to be sin!!! That is what matters to me. When scripture says He born our sin, my NASB says He offered up (to take upon Himself the penalty of) our sins . I definitely do not believe Jesus...

I want you to address why Paul spoke to new Christians in the same way he spoke to men of flesh. This seems too much to ask. Many spiritually dead sinners seek the spiritual milk narrow door, clearly teaching what you clearly deny. God said salvation does not depend on the person who wills...