Search results

No, but if they choose to do that, its acceptable

he did not hold to inspiration.inerrancy so would not see him that conservative, but he was still much better then what came out from the critical theology from Germany as fruit of higher criticism

if we do not inherit faith in ourselves while lost in our sin natures, then MUST be given to us by the Holy Spirit

The irony on this is that Psa is NOT Calvinistic version of Atonement, as Again, the the majority view among Fundamentalist and Evangelicals regardless if one hold to Calvinism or not , as its reformed, Baptists and Evangelicals

The basis is His shed blood which appeases/satisfies the divine wrath of a Holy God towards us while we were yet sinners

To bear our sins means that he will experience what ever lost sinner will in judgement, the very wrath fair those sins at hand of a Holy God

Those would be such as NT Wright and His gang, who denied the precious truth of Pauline Justification for some manmade notions concerning Pauline Justification, as they seek to undo the Reformation and substitute their own vain theology

My understanding on what the Bible teaches to us agrees with the vast majority of Reformed, Baptists, and Evangelicals so you Brother are the one choosing to "walk in your understanding" on some important doctrines of the Fath

No, you affirms that the scriptures align up with your church tradition and dogmas, as Rome is is same boat as Sda with their Ellen White, as you force the bible to agree with your Dogmas and church tradition, so its how Rome interprets it, not hat it actually stated

No, we hold to what the scriptures teach regarding things such as Atonement, and we use other sources written by reformed and Baptists who also exegeted that belief straight from the scriptures themselves

There is also a big danger of trampling underfoot the precious blood of Jesus for our salvation, for if one denies that he bore the very burden of their sins, what Jesus are they really trusting in to save from their sins? except that Jesus as the sin bearer became as t were sin for us, so...

Which should not be allowed to happen if one is holding to KJVO

We Baptists tend to have our own code language, as some of us are GLB, others RB, others FWB, still others Ifb etc

It is a very good sign that we on the Board have rejected as heresy that view

Dictionary: προγινώσκω Greek transliteration: proginōskō Simplified transliteration: proginosko Principal Parts: -, προέγνων, -, προέγνωσμαι, - Numbers Strong's number: 4267 GK Number: 4589 Statistics Frequency in New Testament: 5 Morphology of Biblical Greek Tag: cv-5a Gloss: to know...

Do you think that it would be unfair to have God the Father vent His holy Wrath upon the lord Jesus then? It would be "cosmic child abuse?" And once again, Jesus willingly received that as our sin bearer, was not forced to do that upon that Cross and for the 100th time, where did your and mine...

is that saving faith inherit within all lost persons, or the gift of God?

KJVO, as its a very destuctive held position among Baptist churches

The Entire OT sacrificial system pointed to, foreshadowed the coming messiah, as each feast and festival high lighted to us an aspect of His coming work and ministry, The lamp who died in our stead pointed towards He to come to die in out stead, with our own sins assigned upon himself as that...

Are we justified by God due to him knowing that we would make the "right choice", or due to Him choosing to grant to us the very means to "make the right choice?"